
How low can BMW go? With economy of 62.8mpg and CO2 emissions of 118g/km, the 316d is the cleanest 3-Series yet. But can it still claim to be the ultimate driving machine?
Well, power comes from a detuned version of the 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel found elsewhere in the range. A meagre-sounding 114bhp is backed up by an impressive 260Nm of torque, resulting in a respectable 0-60mph time of 10.9 seconds.
As with all four-cylinder 3-Series models, the 316d gets a raft of fuel-saving technologies including brake-energy regeneration, stop-start and a gearshift indicator. These help it to achieve a theoretical range of up to 800 miles on a single tank.
On the move, the engine feels smooth, and stronger than its horsepower figure suggests. The generous torque makes cruising easy, while the stop-start system cuts in and out unobtrusively.
It might be the slowest car in the line-up, but in terms of steering feel and dynamics the 316d is just as good as its stablemates. Softer suspension than models higher up in the range give it a surprisingly comfortable ride, too.
It is available only in basic ES spec, so luxuries are sparse – although it has air-con and a multi-function leather wheel. The cabin is beautifully built, and brushed aluminium trim gives it a fresh, modern look.
Thanks to the low emissions, private customers will have to pay only £35 road tax. Company car drivers will be even better off: a 13 per cent benefit-in-kind rating offers significant savings over a 318d.
These bonuses will help to offset the price tag, which at £23,330 seems a lot to pay for a 114bhp diesel saloon. Looking ahead, March will see the introduction of an even more frugal model, the 320d EfficientDynamics. This will be faster thanks to its 161bhp engine and – with 109g/km of CO2 and 68.9mpg combined – cheaper to run, too.
Rival: Audi A4 TDIe
For the same money, the 136bhp 2.0 TDIe offers better performance, nearly the same economy and standard parking sensors. But it doesn’t involve drivers quite like the BMW.
Tell us about your car in our Driver Power survey.
For an alternative review of the latest BMW 3-Series visit our sister site carbuyer.co.uk
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
having owned a BMW 120d for two years I am very sceptical on the claimed mpg of 63 for this new 316. I have only got an average of 43.5 over 17000 miles of mostly motorway driving. Even when I have tried my hardest to acheive good mpg by driving slowly and freewheeling wherever possible 50 is the most ever acheived compared to a publicised approx. 60
I agree totally. I run a 118d and having totaled over 42,000 miles have achieved a constant average of 44.8mpg and the very rare peak of about 52!
The chance of achieving anything close to the claimed 62.8mpg could be interesting - a real world test is required please!
The softer more comfortable ride has nothing to do with suspension settings, it's because the ES grade, to save money, comes with standard tyres instead of the stiff sidewall (harsh riding) run flat tyres.... which many consider a good thing anyway.
I collected my 316d yesterday - had to drive it 152 miles from the dealer and got an average of 62mpg according to the trip computer. Drove 160 miles on the motorway today and got an average of 65mpg driving at around 75mph. Also did a 22 mile drive this evening on country roads at 61 mpg. Delighted with the car - feels like a big upgrade on a Golf diesel - but at not much extra cost given the serious discounts on offer.
I collected my 316d yesterday - had to drive it 152 miles from the dealer and got an average of 62mpg according to the trip computer. Drove 160 miles on the motorway today and got an average of 65mpg driving at around 75mph. Also did a 22 mile drive this evening on country roads at 61 mpg. Delighted with the car - feels like a big upgrade on a Golf diesel - but at not much extra cost given the serious discounts on offer.
Not sure how other people drive, but I have a 320d auto (177bhp) and get up to 51 mpg on the motorway! even when driving in France fully loaded I get 49 mpg at a steady 85!
I am not the sort of driver who coasts or pootles around at 56mph either.
I have a friend with a 325d who also gets well in excess of 55 mpg!
These new EfficientDynamics BMWs are just that, and the competition are struggling to keep up.
My 318d 2008 has averaged 50.4 mpg overall. In town I estimate it only does 35-40 commuting to work. On Motorway or long journeys its more than 50. Must be about 60 mpg to balance the 35 MPG in town. My average speed is only 28 mph to date. Previously I had Mini 1 and that averaged 40 mpg.
I've now had my 316d for 4 weeks and clocked up over 4K miles and averaging around >54mpg, on the motorway at 75mph it will easily do >65mpg, around 700 miles between fill ups. Great ride, not as sluggish as expected after my last car (Focus 2.0 TdCI). Costing me less on tax as well only being 13%. A must for any company car driver.
Not sure how the 118d and 120d drivers can't get higher MPG. I am driving a 330d have done 10,000 miles, average speed of around 45mph and am getting 45.5mpg
I agree the 120D MPG is way off what BMW state. I own 96 model before all the EfficientDynamics.
However since fitting the Spider tuning devise my fuel consumption is about 20% better and the car drives smoother with more power.
Totally recommend this my average MPG have gone up from around 36MPG to 45MPG. On the motorway doing 70 MPG it will average around 65 MPG so for around 400 quid gets you EfficientDynamics without the cost and more power!
I reckon that 63mpg is plausible. I saw 67mpg from my 2007 BMw 120d M Sport, though admittedly the average from that new engine settled at 42mpg.
Currently have a 2005 330d M Sport automatic and I am very happy with an average of over 34mpg given that most of my journeys are short/town based and I am not shy of stamping on the loud pedal. When you bear in mind that this is a model without the Efficient Dynamics jiggery pokery and it's capable of 0-60 in 6.7 seconds, it's all good! Plus, there's nothing like seeing your average mpg go UP while you are sat in the outside lane of the motorway...
I'm amazed to see the claimed MPG figures from apparently frugal diesels, when I am achieving 45ish MPG from a petrol Vauxhall - mostly on my combined road types commute. I have crossed checked the in-car computer against the fill up amount, it will go down to about 40 in the coldest times and improves to nearly 50 in the summer.
Amazing what can be achieved with a light right foot.
The 316d makes a lot of sense. It’s as good to drive as any other 3-Series, with a smooth diesel that pulls strongly despite its relative lack of power. Spec isn’t luxurious but build quality is first class, while low running costs will appeal to private and fleet drivers alike. Those looking for a more powerful and frugal 3-Series could wait for next year’s 320d EfficientDynamics, but in the meantime the 316d makes a strong case for itself.