
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
Forgiffe my bad English, but there are som mistakes in this review. Two big mistakes: De SD4 is 190bhp. 148bhp is de TD4. The pictures shows the Dynamic and not the Prestige. It's also a pitty that the automatic transmission is shown, while the review was an manual box. Actually it doesn't matter me anymore that much, I've ordered allready an Evoque!
Good luck with the Car, and remember join the AA, you will need it.
also high demand means it will hold it's value better than a BMW. it's a beauty!
Having been to see this car, it looks good but it sure is style over substance,i ask as to where is the "cheap" baby ranger and who on earth let this design with such a small window,put two people in the back (as i did )and its almost impossible to see through....is this progress?
So my vote goes to Skoda...the Yeti ...and i know it will not need the AA half as much......yes i have had freelander....oh dear!
build quality so good it was just about equal to a lada riva or moscovitch...How times change !
The Evoque needed to be good enough to justify all the attention – and it certainly is. While it’s not exactly a cheap choice, especially if you go for the more expensive Prestige or Dynamic versions, the car still smacks of the same quality and class as the conventional Range Rover. Plus, it’s great to drive on the road, as well as genuinely capable off it. Low running costs are certain to make this 148bhp 2.2-litre turbodiesel variant a hugely popular buy as well.