
The e-tron Spyder is a glimpse into Audi’s future – we already know the firm is planning a mid-engined sports car to sit below the R8, and this concept gives us the best idea of how it will look. We got an insight into how it might handle, too, as we took the wheel for an exclusive drive.
The car was first displayed at last year’s Paris Motor Show, and its wheelbase is a full 220mm shorter than the R8’s. It’s only 4.06 metres long and 1.11 metres high, but a purposeful-looking 1.81 metres wide. Audi has clearly gone to a lot of trouble to make the e-tron Spyder stand out, and it’s one of the best-looking sports cars we’ve seen; the wheels for example are each made from 66 individual parts.
Climb aboard and the cabin design is simpler, but just as stylish. There’s a set of one-piece carbon fibre seats, complete with electronic adjustment, and they’re very comfortable. Hi-tech touches include ventilation controls that blend seamlessly into the dash and can be opened or closed at the swipe of a finger.
Driving the rear wheels is a 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 diesel engine, while a pair of plug-in electric motors turn the front wheels individually. Together, they produce a total of 383bhp and a huge 1,002Nm of torque.
Not only does that mean the Spyder is capable of sprinting from 0-62mph in 4.4 seconds, but it can also run on electric power alone for around 30 miles. On our first run we were limited to the electric-only mode, and as we pulled away, the e-tron whined and hummed. But there’s a slight disappointment as you realise the car isn’t quite as quick as its looks suggest, too.
That changed when the diesel was fired into life for our second run. The twin-turbo V6 hurled the e-tron forward and, because it uses a CVT gearbox, engineers have done without the artificial gear ‘steps’ of a production car. It just revs up to the point where the most torque is and stays there while the car picks up speed.
But there’s hardly any sound-deadening, so the diesel is noisy and rough, with a hiss as the turbos kick in. The car is convincing in areas you don’t expect, though. The ride feels composed and organised, yet still gives a great feeling of contact with the tarmac, while the suspension – the front taken from the TT RS and the rear from the R8 – provides plenty of grip. But the electromechanical power-steering borrowed from the A1 could do with more feedback.
The drivetrain works so seamlessly that we didn’t notice the electric motors sending differing amounts of power to each front wheel to improve grip and handling. Most impressive of all is the fact that, despite the amazing performance on offer, Audi claims the e-tron Spyder will return 128.4mpg. That’s the same as a Toyota Prius Plug-in, and means a theoretical range of more than 620 miles from the 50-litre fuel tank.
The e-tron Spyder will inspire the new R4, but when it makes production, this diesel-electric drivetrain isn’t expected to be offered initially. Instead, Audi is thought to be looking at using the 2.5-litre turbo from the TT RS, which produces 340bhp. The car is likely to make it on to the road in 2014 as part of a platform-sharing project with Porsche, priced at around £45,000.
For an alternative review of the latest Audi R8 Spyder visit our sister site carbuyer.co.uk
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
How can a sports car do 128MPG, when there isn't any car currently on the market that can deliver those figures - not even a Smart or a Blue Motion - VW boast of their Blue Motion frugality but even the Fox (48.7mpg) is a million miles from 128mpg - something doesnt add up!!!
The whole MPG thing has long since been taken over by the marketing department and is fairly meaningless. The disappointing thing this that road testers appear to be reluctant to publish the actual figures they get when conducting tests (obviously doesn't apply in this case). So how about it Auto Express, why not stick up for consumer and do a group test that compares official and real world MPG figures?
If the car has a 50 litre fuel tank, which is equivalent to 10.999 gallons, then at 128 mpg the range on one tank of fuel would be 1407 miles. This is plainly nonsense, even from a hybrid. The marketers are probably just fiddling with the definition of miles per gallon, just like all the other marketers do these days, to allow for the lower emissions from a very limited range on plug-in electric power only.
By the way, the stated emissions at 49g/km are surely those of the car when driven only using plug-in electric power? I don't see too many people achieving this when they have paid for a 3 litre twin turbo engine to sit around doing nothing in the back of the car. Could you imagine the shame of not being able to keep up with the micra ahead of them when on electric power only?
Whatever the frugality it's a seriously lovely design inside and out. We can almost certainly expect therefore that this is the last we'll see of it except for perhaps some watered down version with a TT interior. It's a pity manufacturers lack the bottle to take some of these stunning concepts to production.
I has a battery big enough to do 30 miles in e.v mode alone and with the 2 together it's more than possible it will achieve 128+ mpg.
In e.mode alone it would probable be over 300 mpg!
But the best thing about electric is the absolute fact that it costs very little to charge.
The Nissan Leaf II will have a range of around 200 miles and the battery will last 200,000 miles or more!
If it comes with a roof, I want one. Dont give a toss what the propulsion is, even if if it has to be a diesel. Some sound-proofing would be nice too.
Audis are often criticised for looking like clones of each other, but you can’t say that of the e-tron Spyder. If it can make it through to production as the R4 with its striking looks intact, then half the battle is already won. The rest is down to how it drives – and on the basis of this concept and Audi’s success with the R8, we can expect it to be one of the most exciting sports cars of the future.