
We've long been fans of the Mazda 3 here at Auto Express. Measured against rivals like the Ford Focus and Volkswagen Golf, it feels sporty and fun to drive.
But as rivals from Ford and Volkswagen set new standards for comfort and technology, there's no doubt that the 3 has been left feeling a little past its prime.
To remedy that, Mazda will launch a facelifted version of the small family hatch early in 2012 offering new looks, an upgraded interior and revised suspension.
Available only as a five-door (the saloon is being dropped in the UK), the range will include 1.6 and 2.0-litre petrol and 1.6 and 2.2-litre diesel engines. A turbocharged 2.3-litre 3MPS version will also be on offer, with a massive 255bhp.
Prices start at £14,995 on the road for the 1.6-litre petrol engined 1.6S, and £17,195 for the cheapest 1.6-litre diesel, the 1.6D TS. The top of the range 3MPS is £23,395.
We tested the 1.6-litre diesel Sport Nav – a £19,945 model which gets 17-inch alloy wheels, a sports body kit and an integrated touch-screen sat-nav system. The centre console is largely unchanged but there is a revised LCD display for the trip computer.
In keeping with Mazda's focus on improving the performance of its cars, there are also small improvements to fuel economy - which see the 1.6D return a creditable 65.7mpg. CO2 is pegged at 115g/km, but there's no stop and start function on this engine.
Capable of sprinting from 0-62mph in 11.0 seconds, the car feels fast. Under full throttle, the diesel engine is noisy, but it revs freely and feels responsive. With 270Nm of torque available from 1,750rpm, there's no doubt that in gear performance is strong - and as an added bonus, the car makes a comfortable cruiser. At 70mph the engine ticks over at a hushed 2,200rpm.
Steering is accurate, and Mazda says that a new electro hydraulic power assistance pump has sharpened feel. We would agree that the system feels reassuringly accurate, particularly when you turn into bends.
Adjustment to suspension helps to smooth the Mazda 3's previously nervous ride, and has the added benefit of making the car feel more solidly built, particularly over pot holes. Special mention should also go to the brakes, which offer lots of feel, and fine control.
So have the changes been enough to allow the 3 to keep pace with rivals from Ford and Volkswagen? The level of technology on offer will please some, while upgrades to the suspension help the 3 keep its sporting crown, without ignoring comfort completely.
However, we would like to have seen changes to interior quality go further, particularly when you consider the top specification version we tried was almost £20,000. The Mazda 3 looks a better prospect lower in the range.
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
centre console remained the same
Styling is subjective, but in my opinion this is a very ugly car. The interior isn't a patch on rivals either. If you don't fancy any of the wealth of better cars currently out there, I'd suggest waiting for the new Hyundai i30 / Kia Ceed out soon.
But I'm also slightly biased - I had a terrible experience of Mazda's appalling customer service a few years ago that means I will never buy one of their products ever again.
Mazda have not done very much to the facelifted 3. The visual changes are very subtle and as far as i am concerned thats just fine. It was always one of the most striking cars in its class and it still is. I know from experience that it drives brilliantly and I'm sure from what the above review states - this is still the case. Sure there are many other talented cars in this sector of the market these days but if you want a great looking and importantly a great driving small hatch I'd suggest buying this.....
WHY hasn't Europe (UK) got the all new SKYACTIV Engines and Transmissions in this new face-fitted Mazda 3 as Australia, USA, Canada and New Zealand have them, so why not Europe?
Some AE commentators are sitting on their brains. The interior of the Mazda 3 is a benchmark for cool, composed, well considered design. Not like the weird fairground frenzy of the Focus or the terminally boring coffin of the Golf. Given the dozy level of comments that often appear on AE is it any wonder that business in general and bankers in particular think it is fair sport to rip off consumers at every opportunity?
Whose idea was it to make the press car metallic brown? It makes it look as though you can polish a turd after all.
firstly auto express how can 115 g/co2 equate to 54.3 mpg when the new civic is rated at 5 g less but 67 mpg combined ??
also the civic diesel is more expensive but has both better performance and sky high fuel economy !
Also I agree with the last two comments. golf interior is very very dull not stylish at all much like the golfs exterior and the focus is very glitzy inside. the new mazda 3 and new civic are much nicer inside and probably better built also.
but what is the obsession with brown it is a horrible colour on any car ! for cars with leather seats it looks like the outside of the cow was used there and the inside of the cow on the outside !!!
I know from experience that Mazda build quality and reliability are second to none, but this version of the Mazda 3 is simply too cramped in the back, and this can't be cured by a mid term facelift. Mazda please note for design of next version.
Cosmetically, I think the front end is great, but I wish they'd taken the opportunity to improve the ugly rear!
my girlfriends 2006 Mazda 3 sport is really reliable and comfortable if a bit unrefined.The build quality is ok but her car has rusting rear wheel Arches even though Mazda have fixed(bodged)them under warranty twice already,the cheap felt carpet is badly torn in both front footwells even though the car has done less than 50k miles.These problems are well known by Mazda as common issues.Hopefully Mazda will learn and this car might stay rust free for more than 5years.
OK so the free market research on the colour Brown should have reached Mazda by now. Good.
Not good is the supply of UK cars with the speedo on the right. Why? Because the right hand (most drivers are right handed) can obscure the critical speed (75mph) that can lose you your license. Either put the speedo in the middle or on the left. The rev counter is a relatively useless dial anyway, it's best use is for watching tickover in cold weather and for economy driving. Neither of which could lose you your license. Come on motor industry, stop being thoughtless, earn your monthly wage.
The Mazda 3 is a better car for the small improvements made to its looks, suspension and equipment levels, but it remains a relatively rare sight on UK roads. We really like the way it drives, and its improved handling – but can't help but feel that interior quality is not a match for rivals from Volkswagen and Ford. As a result, top specification cars look expensive, despite their material appeal.