It’s such a common sight on our roads that it’s easy to overlook how neatly styled the Clio is. A huge step forward over its predecessor, both inside and out, it could be argued that it’s not particularly striking, but the well proportioned shape and smooth lines mean it’s easy on the eye.
| |  |
| A huge step forward over its predecessor, both inside and out, its well proportioned shape and smooth lines make it easy on the eye |
 |
The interior is the Renault’s strongest point. It has a premium feel that belies its budget price, and helps the driver get instantly comfortable behind the wheel. The driving position is a little high and the stereo seems low-rent compared to the rest of the controls, but that doesn’t detract from the overall quality ambience that it exudes.
Initially that same positive impression extends to the new 1.2-litre TCE (Turbo Control Efficiency) engine. It’s basically a replacement for the old 1.4-litre naturally aspirated unit, but has more torque available lower down the rev range than its bigger predecessor. However, it barely feels like it’s turbocharged at all. It’s rather sluggish in this company, and that means it has to be worked harder, which raises fuel consumption.
It also lacks refinement at motorway speeds. The engine is adequate around town, but thanks to the Clio’s kerbweight of 1,090kg – 130kg more than the Mazda – it was the slowest at the test track, despite producing more torque lower in the rev range. There’s better news in terms of handling, as the steering is responsive, if a little over sensitive. The Clio has good body control, grip and a smooth ride, too, although it lacks the Mazda’s nimble behaviour.
The Renault is the cheapest model here at £11,715, but equipment isn’t particularly generous, and it’s the only car that doesn’t have electronic stability control as standard.