The waiting is finally over! Audi has shocked Detroit Motor Show goers with a new electric concept car that previews a new zero emission baby brother for the R8 supercar.
Sharing the same 'e-tron' badge as its larger R8-derived brother, which was revealed at the Frankfurt Motor Show last September – read our drive of that car here – the new model is 33cm smaller at 3.93m and even shorter than a TT. It is based on an aluminium space fame chassis, and gets carbon fibre reinforced plastic body panels to keep weight to an absolute minimum.
Tipping the scales at around 1,350kgs, the e-tron MK2 is 250kg lighter than the e-tron MK1 and will be the lightest in the carmaker's line up.
Designed in Munich, it's the work of exterior design boss, Steve Lewis: "We've been working on this car for the last four months. Many of the design themes seen here show how we're going to take Audi design forward – such as the sharper lines and more pronounced wheelarches."
Between the cabin and the rear axle is the same all electic powerplant as its sister car, but with two motors instead of four. These drive the rear wheels, and are capable of delivering up to 204bhp.
Though doing away with the firm’s trademark Quattro four wheel drive system, figures promise the car will sprint from 0-62mph in only 5.9sec, while top speed is 124mph, though limited to preserve the batteries.
With a potential range of 155 miles, company engineers promise the car can be fully charged in as little as two hours, though owners will need a special 400volt electricity supply.
Prices for the newcomer are still to be confirmed, however, it’s believe the car could go on sale as early as 2012.
Positioned below Audi’s R8 and below the £100,000 e-tron supercar, drivers could expect a price tag of around £50,000.
>>BACK TO DETROIT HOMEPAGE
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
So you get maximum range of about 1hour there and back on any motorway....
What happens if you drive from London to Birmingham and nobodys got a special 400volt supply...Will you have to get your car back on a RAC flatbed?
Thats why petrol/ hybrids are here now allready Audi! Or is this car just for parking outside winebars?
I can imagine this with more conventional running gear as the next TT. Smaller, and hence lighter, has to be the way to go.
Doesn't look bad - definitely better than the R8, but isn't it a tad 80s? Still, the first nice-looking Audi design for years.
I can imagine this with more conventional running gear as the next TT. Smaller, and hence lighter, has to be the way to go.
More concept rubbish from Audi this time, what a waste of development money.
Diesel Hybrid is the way to go.
a small efficient diesel OR petrol will produce less co2 in its life time than a new electric car would produce in the process of making it. and then all these people who say 'electric cars are the future', where do they think the electricy comes from! powerstations! big grey (usually) ugly things that pump out tons of co2. personally i think hydrogen is the way to go in the future, but this electric car stuff is nonsense to me. long live the internal combustion engine!
Hear Hear!
I second your thoughts!
Sadly guys - the problem with hydrogen is the same is with electric cars - where does hydrogen come from? Two places - stripped off hydro-carbons (aka oil, coal & gas leaving CO2 as the by-product) or separated from water and that takes LOTs of energy which we get from ....
Only ONE good answer - get a good clean source of electricity as fast as possible ... then hydrogen or batteries is a moot point ... unfortunantly fusion looks a good few years off ... bit of a bummer that ..
All electrics are always is attacked by "where does all the power come from, etc"
My neighbor has been running an all electric Toyota RAV 4 off his roof, as in solar for the last 10 yrs. His CO2 footprint while driving is 0! The problem is not that all electrics are not feasible but that societies are not doing enough to clean up its electric power production act.
In the meantime all electrics are much cheaper per mile than the old traditional internal combustion cars. Nice to know we can save a bit of cash while we wait for a better source of electricity. Can't really see the down side. So to Outrun, I must reply with "Death to the Internal Combustion Dinosaur Technology" and in with the new as soon as possible. It's far from nonsense! It's actually the best way forward now and not just pie in the sky hydrogen promises that for some reason are always at least 10 -15 yrs away.
And where do you think Solar Cells come from? Fairyland? Their first - cost of production, the cost of recycling, and the toxic chemicals involved in their manufacture and recycling all beg much the same questions as ALL the other`" alternative" solutions, including wind farms, etc., do! In building design (my subject) recent fashionable implementations of these modes of supplemental power production actually have payback times of up to five hundred years (if the building is still there, and never needed any maintenance during that half - millennium, that is)! Except...for fusion - power. If only we could crack THAT nut, then we really would be "cooking with gas" - sorry, "sea - water"...?
Stop wasting time with all this "hybrid Technology". The way to go is Hydrogen. It will make everything else redundant.