For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
"we headed out to obtain quotes for an immaculate 2005 Audi A2 TDI, prepared by the manufacturer itself, with a mere 32,500 miles on the clock.
"But the real kicker is the £101 deducted due to a “deep” scratch on the door that is barely noticeable."
Beware articles which are written by car journalists who claim a car with a scratch (and only one key) is immaculate.. It is not.
Which kind of makes the veracity of the rest of the article a bit dubious.
You may think that Coopers have £1500 profit in a used car at that valuation but have you taken into account the following spend?
x1 spare key
buff on the bodywork
valet
advertising
service to keep up a warranty
12 months approved warranty
then the killer!! 20% VAT on anything (if your lucky) to have left in the car!!!!
So now do you understand why there if a difference between trade and retail values? You journalists need to research things properly before you start to slag off reputable main agent dealerships which are after all offering a A1 premiuom service and the shock that we are aloud to make money!!!!!
"You journalists need to research things properly before you start to slag off reputable main agent dealerships"
Research? You mean hack their phones? :-)
Every so often I think about trading in my car, but when I think about all the trouble that involves, I just change my mind. I always love the fact that the salesman gives you a "figure to change" which makes the total cost of the new car and the trade-in price slightly vague. It's not rocket science to deduct one figure from another, but until you've signed on the dotted line the formula the dealership uses to achieve it remains a mystery which is only solved when the car is delivered. Years ago I did try to sell my cars privately, but just gave up. Too much trouble dealing with tyre kickers or people whose idea of a reasonable offer is thousands less than the advertised price.
What if it was not a premium saloon but a Pacific rim product?
What if you paid £6K and the first valuation 6days after purchase was just £3k5?
What if you spent 2 hours wailing for a trade-in value, £3100. Then to be told that "by the time your specially built car is here (about 6 weeks) your car probably will not meet the required £2K deposit."
All this has happened to me and I am so disillusioned with the current motor trade attitude and interest that I cannot face trying to find a replacement for the Pacific-rim motor that I currently own.
Mainly because most dealerships are awash with the same model that I want rid of; so I am trapped into keeping an rapidly depreciating and unloved trade-in.
So tread carefully and only consider buying a premium European designed and manufactured car, everything else won't be worth spending your money on, when you choose to change...
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
the good shopping place
please input our website
{w w w }
YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!
thank you!!!
{w w w }
Believe you will love it.
{w w w }
Having just read you attempt at journalism I feel the need to respond to your poorly thought out drivel. I am a car dealer for a prestige German brand and cannot believe the utter nonsense you have just written. You mention that it is 'Galling that the dealer could make a NET £1500 profit from your Audi A2 as well as the profit from the one she is selling'. Firstly , are they not allowed to make a profit out of the part exchange, they are a car dealer after all, and if they don't make a profit who will you buy your cars from or more importantly where will you go for a car on Xmas eve, when yours breaksdown?
Secondly the NET £1500 profit. They will be lucky to make a third of that and I will explain why. You get £5500 (admittedly by you part of that money comes from the car you are being sold, reducing the profit in the car you are buying) and the dealer sells it at £7000 leaving a GROSS of £1500. Deduct the cost of putting through the Audi approved programme even if it requires just the door painted you are now down to £1400 plus the check through the work shop , we are down to £1250, deduct the cost of the missing key we are now at £1050, as Audi insist the car has two keys, put a warranty on it at £300 minimum for a year, we are now at £750. Take VAT out of the profit and now we are at £600. The new buyer of said car wants a discount of even a couple of hundred pounds and we are at £400. Then the salesman, who believe or not will want paid for it £50 to £100, then the actual profit will be between £300 and £350. So please, before you print something for masses to read who do not know what is involved in putting a car up for sale , do you research , you guys are supposed to be the experts! PS Thanks for making a depressed market even worse by making the buying public even more suspicious of mostly genuine honest salespeople. What I find galling is that you charge over £2 for a magazine and market it sa having proper information and facts in it and it is just utter nonsense.
Oh dear, people making a profit!
Oh dear, we can't have that can we?!
Get real will you?
Profit makes the world go round!
You motoring journalists do not have a clue.
As a car sales manager (retired) I can advise you that all cars are valued at the same price (benchmark)
They are then reappraised and money taken off or added on the condition of the car, the Mileage,Service history, paintwork, how many owners etc,.
Depending on what part of the country you are doing the deal will depend on what price you get as some models sell better in other areas. It also has a bearing on what car you are going to exchange it for.
If the car you require has a big discount, it is added to the value of the car you wish to exchange, If the car you want has no discount then there is nothing to add to the value of your car, hence the difference in the value of your car.
I reiterate you really dont have a "Clue"
Your article is missing another valuation...
...an insurance company. I bet you wouldn't even get close to being able to buy the same spec car with the valuation an insurer would give if they had to right it off.
Yes he does.
Whatever way you look at it, offering a trade-in at below book price for a good car is just mean. (By all means take issue with CAP/Glass's/whoever, not the journalist in this instance.)
Also, sachad3's calculations are wrong, because they based on pricing the car up on the forecourt at £7000. We all know that a dealer would probably price the car in question at £8000 (data above), and ultimately sell for perhaps £7500.
Here's an example. A dealer rang me up and asked if I wanted to trade my car in as it was three years old, and he could offer a £750 discount off a nearly-new one. Sounded like a good deal. So I asked for a trade-in price. We went through everything, and eventually I was offered £1300 under book price for my car. I was surprised at his low valuation, and baffled by the excuses for not even getting close to the book price. But oddly enough not as surprised as he was when I told him I wasn't interested. "But you've made me do all that work in getting a price for your car!" he moaned. Oh, how my heart bled.
I appreciate that times are tough in the car trade, and know that dealer's profits are being squeezed. Join the club. Dealers must not forget that customers are being squeezed harder - petrol, food the list goes on. If a larger % of people find the confidence to sell privately after being offered a low trade-in price, and no real incentive on a new car, then you will find it even tougher.
Unfortunately, some consumers DO have a clue. And Auto Express is for consumers; it's not a trade journal. So stop moaning.
Now don't get me started on WeBuyAnyCar....