For an alternative review of the latest Ford Focus visit our sister site carbuyer.co.uk
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
i would like to see an MPG test with the 1.0 and the 1.6 going as fast as they could around a track, perhaps getting similar lap times, but what would the economy results be?
How would driving as fast as you can around a track give you any idea of real world fuel economy - better off driving 20 feet at no more than 20 MPH, stopping for 10 minutes and repeating the process for 3 hours - that would represent my M25 and M1 commute home on a Friday night :)
On the face of it this makes far more sens than the 1.6TDCi model. Fuel consumption and emissions are comparable, but it costs around £850 less to buy whilst petrol iself is currently much cheaper than Diesel
Depends where you live and when you drive, for me it's never in busy times, and in rural areas with lots of hills. Then add heavy foot. Thats my real world normal drive.
Anyway I would like this 123bhp 1.0 engine in a Ford Ka (ST?) as I only like small cars.
Fiat had big claims about MPG from it's twin air engine saying it could get up to 63mpg or something similar... however in the real world it's only achieving about 30-35mpg!
Smaller engine even with a turbo strapped on has to work harder to lug the car up to speed. Seems every manufacturer is trying to make the engine smaller and smaller and strapping a turbo on and then saying 'Well the car can do up to... 80mpg'. The average joe will never see anything remotely close to that.
The sight of a car on fire should make anyone think twice about buying a petrol fuelled vehicle. Other considerations are trivial.