Overall Average Rating: 88.66%
Position in the Top 100 cars: 12th

We were surprised to find Mazda’s old-shape 6 so low down the ranking this year. After all, it topped the poll in 2003 and has posted decent results ever since.

You cite average build quality, poor economy, ride and driving ease, plus below par comfort, as potential reasons. It still scores highly for practicality, though.

Manufacturer Verdict (Position: 10th)

it’s fallen one place, yet Mazda is still in the top 10. The blot in its copybook is 23rd position for running costs, although it’s offset by a fifth-placed rank in both the handling and braking categories.

Overall Average:
4.433
88.66%
13th in Driver Power 2010
Owners who would buy a Mazda Mazda6 Owner Reviews Container again
4.35
87%
14th in Driver Power 2010
Owners who would buy another Mazda 6 again:
4.9
98%
7th in Driver Power 2010
Running Cost:
3.983
79.66%
33rd in Driver Power 2010
07-reg Petrol, Owner for 1 to 3 years

I had high hopes for the Mazda 6; my previous car was a Mazda 626 (nothing to be proud of) but I thought it was excellent. Fair enough it lurched around bends like a barge, and this was exacerbated by the least supportive seats I'd ever encountered but the 2.0 engine was potent and flexible and it could return 37mpg normally and 42mpg on the motorway, plus it never missed a beat in the six years I owned it. As a result I pretty much ignored every other make and model and made a bee line for the 6 which had been winning accolades by the dozen and was said to be a world apart from the 626. I admit I rushed into the purchase a little as the model I found was the Katano special edition and I liked the idea of something a little rarer than the regular 6. My first concern was with the dealer, they were messing up the finance even though I was financing through the bank; then I had an issue with one of the roof-rack runner caps being missing which they promised to replace but still hadn't when I picked the car up and then they wouldn't return my calls afterwards.
They couldn't explain why there was no sat-nav, which should have been standard on the Katano model, in fact they didn't know much about a 6's specifications at all for a Mazda dealer! Some front fogs as standard would have been nice too.
The car - I'd expected the 6 to be a couple of mpg better than the 626 being as it was 9 years younger and with a 6 speed box over a 5 speed.
Unfortunately it is about 3 mpg down, returning around 35mpg and strangely even on a long motorway run I've only managed to eke out 38mpg and it bottomed out at 31 mpg when I gave it a leathering.
The 6 is heavier than the 626 with airbags up the wazoo but I think it's the hideous rolling resistance that's largely to blame. Even down hill in neutral the car won't pick up speed and it feels like the handbrake is stuck on sometimes. The rolling resistance also doesn't help with the gear changes which are jerky through a sharp bite on the clutch and the car decelerating the moment you clutch in; you need to be very quick on the change to get anything near a smooth change. Hopefully when it comes to tyre change time I'll get some more eco-friendly tyres which will abate these problems; I can afford for the handling to suffer from less grippy tyres as the handling is far tighter than I (or my passengers) need.
After that though the engine is quite pokey and flexible, speed can drop as low as 25 without having to drop below 6th gear.
On other matters, the rear seat backs are a little too vertical for comfort and I have doubts about the durability of the seat material.
A big concern is the trip computer - firstly you can either use the computer OR see the clock, which is ludicrous, you always want the clock displaying. Second, the mpg shows up as litres per 100 miles or some other such nonsense, which is worthless. And thirdly the fuel remaining calculations are miles out.
The climate control can be annoying too; even with a 7 speed fan it doesn't always prioritise the airflow the way I'd like it.
Other niggles - minor I know - the light for the ignition key slot lights up the key and not the slot you want to insert it in, which is pointless.
After all this it sounds like I absolutely hate the car but I don't; it's been a disappointment in many ways but the engine is nice and flexible, it handles the bends brilliantly and the front seats are comfy even for a six footer, and very supportive in the bends. Also worth noting is the rear seat folding mechanism which is very handy, and the 6 looks good (much better than the new style 6) especially with the Katano's twin pipes, spoiler and alloys.

Cost: 2/5
04-reg Petrol, Owner for 3 to 5 years

Mazda managed to produce a lot of car for the money in the 6 and i think the model raised the image ofthe company considerably. It maybe getting on a bit now and slipping down the ratings but it has been a great family car. My only real grumble is the quality of the paintwork. The slightest knock in a Tesco car parks leave a blemish or chipped paint.

Cost: 3/5
06-reg Diesel, Owner for 1 to 3 years

I bought the slightly higher bhp engined 6 and have been pleasantly surprised by its performance and especially mpg. Ive had diesls before and its up there with the best. Interiro is a little bland and some basics for the year are missing such as a self dimming rear view but on the whole would recommend

Cost: 5/5
07-reg Petrol, Owner for 1 to 3 years

Very bad ingress of damp into headlights which I have been told by Mazda HQ is normal! MPG I obtain is no way near the manufacturer's quoted figure. I find the car MPG very poor particularly in town driving. Wonder if any other Mazda 6 Katano drivers are suffering the headlights problem?

Cost: 3/5
05-reg Diesel, Owner for 3 to 5 years

Turbo power if I want in a car that gives 48/50 MPG for a 2L
Great acceleration and with the 5 door hatch ease of lowering the rear seat backs and the ability to take bulky items,
I did my research and have not been disapointed and will buy Mazda again.

Cost: 5/5
05-reg Diesel, Owner for 3 to 5 years

The 6 is a great car, good to drive & apart from the niggle with the clutch has never let me down. It is powerful and economical in great measures & I always look forward to driving it.
I wouldn't hesitate to buy another Mazda 6 Diesel

Cost: 4/5
56-reg Diesel, Owner for Less than a year

Very much easier to drive than my last T reg mazda 626. The average consumtion on my current 6 is about the same as the best motorway consumption 45 mpg

Cost: 5/5
06-reg Diesel, Owner for 3 to 5 years

It ticks all the boxes required, for an economical large family car, long runs are a breeze, short runs a blast!

Cost: 5/5
07-reg Petrol, Owner for Less than a year

can be as fun as your feeling or as sensible as you want it to be. heavier clutch than some cars though.

Cost: 5/5
58-reg Petrol, Owner for 1 to 3 years

i believe that my mazda is a excelent car it ticks 8 out of 10 boxes and for me thats a good car

Cost: 3/5
54-reg Petrol, Owner for 3 to 5 years

5 years and 60k miles, and only one minor niggle. And looks better than the latest model.

Cost: 3/5
52-reg Diesel, Owner for 1 to 3 years

Good reliable car that is good fun to drive. Repairs can be expensive though.

Cost: 3/5
09-reg Petrol, Owner for Less than a year

Very nice car. Possibly not as manouverable in parking as previous model.

Cost: 5/5
07-reg Petrol, Owner for 1 to 3 years

EXCELLENT APART FROM BAD INGRESS OF DAMP INTO HEADLIGHTS!

Cost: 3/5
53-reg Diesel, Owner for 3 to 5 years

fantastic vlaue for money, cheap and very very cheerfull

Cost: 4/5
55-reg Petrol, Owner for

Very good car, so good I have just orderd a new one!

Cost: 3/5
06-reg Petrol, Owner for Less than a year

great car but running costs too high (Mazda6 MPS)

Cost: 2/5
03-reg Petrol, Owner for 1 to 3 years

excellent car,great to drive with sharp looks

Cost: 3/5
05-reg Petrol, Owner for Less than a year

Best value in a full sized family hatch.

Cost: 5/5
09-reg Diesel, Owner for Less than a year

A triumph and an excellent choice!

Cost: 5/5
07-reg Petrol, Owner for 1 to 3 years

excellent - does what a car should

Cost: 5/5
03-reg Petrol, Owner for More than 5 years

trouble free motoring.Just great

Cost: 5/5
09-reg Petrol, Owner for Less than a year

Very good and would recommend

Cost: 3/5
05-reg Petrol, Owner for Less than a year

Fine thanks.

Cost: 2/5
55-reg Petrol, Owner for 3 to 5 years

GOOD

Cost: 3/5