Search Car Reviews



See all makes



BMW 530d GT vs Audi A5 Sportback

Stylish five-door coupé provides the toughest challenge for blue propeller

BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback

November 2009

The designers at BMW aren’t the only ones to have caught the hatchback bug. Audi has already experimented with the concept by adding a tailgate – plus a pair of rear doors and some extra length – to the handsome A5 to create the sleek new Sportback.

Measuring over 4.7 metres long and two metres wide, it strikes an impressive pose. However, next to the enormous BMW, the Audi shrinks into the background – it has been built to a completely different scale.

The 5-Series GT is a touch narrower than its rival, but it’s bigger in every other respect. As a result it carries much more road presence. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, though, and opinion is split on the GT’s styling. Is it a looker, or does the car’s sheer size alone give the imposing stance? One thing’s for sure – colour and wheel choice make or break the newcomer from a styling standpoint.

The silver paint and 20-inch alloys fitted to our test model complement its proportions, and it looks better in the metal than our pictures convey. Yet we’ve also seen cars on smaller wheels and with darker paint finishes – and these do the GT few favours.

Even a glitzy paintjob can’t hide the BMW’s occasionally awkward proportions, and the rear can appear particularly heavy-handed from some angles. In contrast, the Audi looks great all-round.

Smaller 18-inch rims fill the wheelarches, and give the flagship A5 Sportback a purposeful look without the awkwardness that afflicts the BMW. Plus, its tailgate is free from gimmicks and opens in the conventional manner.

Inside, the quality of the A5’s cabin is impressive, but its dashboard is shared with the A5 coupé and cabriolet – so it lacks the all-new appeal of the BMW interior. Even so, we’ve no complaints about the Sportback and it’s a fine place to while away the miles.

There is more standard kit in the GT, though, and for those who spend time in the rear it is the more appealing choice. Not only is there more leg and headroom in the back, but independently sliding rear seats also provide more luxury than the Audi. Our biggest complaint surrounds the centre rear seat. It’s purely for occasional use, the head restraint can’t be adjusted and the firm cushion makes it uncomfortable for anything longer than short trips.

This isn’t a deal breaker, though, because the A5 is strictly a four-seater with a pair of heavily sculpted rear seats and no option for a fifth seatbelt in between.

When it comes to luggage space, the huge BMW is left trailing with the rear seats in place. Fold them flat, however, and the 5-Series GT has comfortably the biggest load area – at 1,700 litres.

Even though the Audi costs nearly £7,000 less, both cars are powered by torquey 3.0-litre diesels. Performance is very similar, too, but the way they behave is very different. Where the BMW is smooth, linear and undramatic, the A5 feels much more urgent.

This is partly down to the seven-speed S tronic twin-clutch transmission, which can be slow-witted compared to the super-smooth eight-speeder in the GT. While the quattro drivetrain ensures that the Sportback is quicker off the line and has impressive mid-corner grip, the BMW is better balanced and more rewarding to drive. And even with the £980 optional Drive Select system fitted, the Audi suffers from heavy and uncommunicative steering.

The 5-Series GT has a more engaging and accurate set-up, but low-speed ride comfort is a bugbear. The combination of its large alloy rims, narrow tyre sidewalls and unforgiving run-flat rubber sees it thump over manhole covers and into potholes around town. It’s smoother at high speed, but this is still an irritation.

Look at the numbers, and the balance swings back in the Audi’s favour. It is expected to hold on to 53.1 per cent of its original value after three years, compared to 43.3 per cent for the BMW. As a result, both cars will be worth roughly the same amount after that time, even though the BMW is much more expensive.

Neither model lived up to its claimed fuel consumption, yet the GT’s fuel return of 32.6mpg was nearly 6mpg up on the Sportback.

Styling and budget will be key to any decision between these cars. Both offer similar attributes, but present them in different ways. And we wonder if the Audi will hold the upper hand once the novelty of seeing a 5-Series GT on the road begins to wear off...

What Next

Sponsored Results

5 Comments

Is anyone buying this?

5 series GranTurd is a 5 series hatchback and the A5 Sportback is an A4 hatchback. German businessman in a hatchback!?! He'd sooner kill himself. But in a GranTurismo or in a Sportback his dignity is intact, because in Germany words are more meaningful and real than reality itself.

By chickenfeed on 1 December, 2009, 12:03am

Any BMW on run-flats would be an absolute dog, and would never get near any possible list of cars in this class/category for me.
I'm interested.....will the day ever come when when car mags stop [mindlessly] bashing the way, it seems, most Audis drive, or Audi start making their cars driveable??? Curiously, Audi still manage to sell hundreds of thousands of cars, AND grow their market, while other german marques are losing market share!!

By barina47 on 14 December, 2009, 3:27am

BMW 530d GT vs Audi A5 Sportback

Having switched from new audi's too buying new BMW's, I was keen to drive the 5GT.
I found the size of the car way tooooo big, boot space average, but much improved interior finishing.
Without going into a slagging match (one in favour of the other) the bottom line for me was the 5GT was "TOO BIG".

By johnbmwx6 on 14 January, 2010, 10:25am

Another 'no contest' win to the Audi !!
Is there really some point of comparison between these two?? The A5 morphed from the coupe to a 5-door very well for my eye. The GT still looks bloated, haviing not spend quite enough time at Jenny Craig's being lypo'd out of an X5. Stupid sized rims, rubber band tyres, dumb-arse run-flats, and legitimate carping by AE about jarring low-speed ride should spell the death for any prospective buyer who respects and value their spine and liver.
Here here the comment about Audi's booming growth where other german makers have seriously shrunk.

By barina47 on 9 July, 2010, 9:56am

btw AE, when did the weight of a vehicle become dismissive enough not to get a mention. Kinda makes all the garbage[?] about strives in economy a bit pointless.

By barina47 on 9 July, 2010, 9:58am

You need to register to post comments. Existing members can log in below to comment, otherwise click here to join.



Sponsored Results

Social Bookmarks

Full Car Reviews

Photography

BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
BMW 530d GT Vs. Audi A5 Sportback
- Advertisement -

Sponsored Results

Facts and Figures

DETAILS

WHY? New Sportback is the executive hatch of the moment. It’s smaller than 5-Series GT, but fast, sleek and luxurious.
AT A GLANCE:

BMW 530d GT
* Price: £40,810
* Engine: 3.0-litre 6cyl, 242bhp
* 0-60mph: 7.0 seconds
* AE economy: 32.6mpg
* Official CO2: 173g/km
* Annual road tax: £175

Audi A5 3.0 TDI SE
* Price: £34,020
* Engine: 3.0-litre V6, 237bhp
* 0-60mph: 6.8 seconds
* AE economy: 26.8mpg
* Official CO2: 174g/km
* Annual road tax: £175

 

SCORES

Styling:
Score: 4
Interior:
Score: 5
Driving:
Score: 4
Costs:
[ Rating ]
Green:
Score: 4
 
- Advertisement -