
The outlook for Honda has never been so clear. This is the firm’s hydrogen-powered FCX Clarity, which it is backing to lead the world into a fuel cell future.
As part of that effort, the FCX Clarity gets its European launch this week. Being previewed in Germany, the clock is ticking on a UK launch, too. We got behind the wheel to find out what a lucky few have to look forward to.
It’s soon obvious that there are some major hurdles to overcome – not least the fact that extracting hydrogen in a sustainable way remains a major challenge. Honda’s short-term solution is to provide drivers with their own ‘home energy station’ – a device that turns gas from the mains supply into hydrogen for your car.
There are no such question marks over the way the model drives, though. With a fuel cell-powered electric motor turning the front wheels, the Clarity feels remarkably similar to any other hatch on the move.
Progress is smooth, and apart from a gentle whine as you get up to speed, the cabin is eerily silent.
The Clarity is no slouch, either: as with any electric car there’s plenty of torque, which shoots it from 0-60mph in 10.0 seconds and on to a top speed of 101mph.
Weighing in at 1,625kg, the Clarity is substantially heavier than eco-rivals such as Toyota’s Prius and Honda’s own Insight, and that’s sometimes noticeable in the corners. But the FCX more than makes up for it with a useful range of 270 miles, and its maker says the energy-equivalent fuel consumption works out at around 81mpg.
While questions over eco-friendly hydrogen extraction remain, this car impresses. Capable of returning the equivalent of 81mpg, it is quiet, refined and practical. Cabin quality is first-rate, and the ride and handling are acceptable, too.
However, as a result of each example’s high production cost, it’s unlikely to be made widely available any time soon.
This car purpose is to be environmentally friendly and it's rating has to be mostly based on this, since there is no other car at 300 pounds a month (no doubt subsidized by Honda) that does not out class it in every other way (ok perhaps it is the quietest...). So what do we have - an impressive 81 mpg, but hardly revolutionary. 50% of a car's lifetime emissions come come at the time of manufacture before fuel usage, however given this car weighs a lot and is very expensive to build (expense usually means energy intensive) and needs its own separate hydrogen generator, it is hardly environmentally friendly in this respect. Now add that the hydrogen generation itself is dubious environmentally. We don't exactly have an eco car. This car is important as a technology test bed and for the cars that may ultimately be derived from it. 3 out of 5 for effort - not for the car itself.
While questions over eco-friendly hydrogen extraction remain, this car impresses. Capable of returning the equivalent of 81mpg, it is quiet, refined and practical.
Cabin quality is first-rate, and the ride and handling are acceptable, too. However, as a result of each example’s high production cost, it’s unlikely to be made widely available any time soon.
Auto Express Give Another Dumb Score
I've lost count of the times I've read an Auto Express review and seen that the star rating doesn't match with the text. Read the text here and in no way would you guess that the car would only get 3 stars. Apart from the fact that it's not easy to purchase/extract the hydrogen and the fact that the car has - right now - a high production cost, there seems to be no real negatives. I'd like somebody working for the magazine to explain the score. Also, the magazine has not explained properly the 81MPG.
By LeeVGI on 14 October, 2009, 4:13pm