Search Car Reviews



See all makes

Cadillac CTS-V

Can we tame America’s fastest and most powerful saloon on UK roads?

Cadillac CTS-v

Text: James Disdale / Photos: Matt Vosper

December 2009

  • Rating:

IF there’s one country on the planet that knows how to do muscle cars, it’s America. Yet even in the US, the machine you’re looking at here really stands out. Not only is it the quickest, most powerful Cadillac ever produced, but it’s also the quickest, most powerful American saloon in history.

This is the CTS-V, and it has some ambitious targets in its sights: the 507bhp BMW M5, 510bhp Jaguar XFR and 518bhp Mercedes E63 AMG.

Should the competition be worried? We took the wheel of one of the first UK-spec examples to find out.

Although the CTS-V costs £59,000, a quick glance at its technical details shows Cadillac has every right to be confident.

Under the bonnet lies the same 6.2-litre supercharged V8 as used by the Corvette ZR-1. And while it has been slightly detuned for this model, it beats its European rivals hands down, with outputs of 556bhp and 747Nm of torque.

Such incredible punch means supercar pace. The 0-60mph dash takes less than four seconds, and top speed is 175mph. Power delivery is lazy yet crushing, with relentless urge from idle right to the red line, all accompanied by a bellowing NASCAR-style soundtrack and a touch of supercharger whine.

It’s just a pity the six-speed automatic box delivers such clunky shifts. A manual version is available for £2,500 less.

On twisty roads, American muscle cars have never offered the cornering ability of their European counterparts. But the CTS-V has been tuned at the Nürburgring circuit in Germany and acquits itself pretty well.

In addition to stiffened suspension, it features Audi R8-style magnetic dampers, which adjust continuously to match the road conditions. The steering is well weighted, with decent feedback, and the Cadillac turns into corners sharply and displays strong grip. However, near its limits, the CTS-V can be a handful, as it lacks the poise and balance of the XFR.

What’s more, despite those clever dampers, the ride is very firm, even in its softest setting. On bumpy back roads, it never really settles, causing the car occasionally to skip around. And that’s an issue on a wide saloon that’s available with left-hand drive only.

The brakes are spectacular, though. Specially developed by Brembo, they’re extremely powerful. If only the cabin was up to the same standard. It’s a real disappointment, given the CTS-V’s price tag.

Cheap plastics, a poor-quality build and a confusing trip computer are the worst features. On a positive note, it is spacious and generously equipped, with touchscreen sat-nav and an entertainment centre that offers a television and DVD player.

Is the Caddy on a par with class-leading sporting saloons from Europe? Not really. While it’s fast and a lot of fun, it’s not as polished. But if you’re after something different, the CTS-V is well worth a look.

Tell us about your car in our Driver Power survey.

What Next

Sponsored Results

4 Comments

Not a fair review

It has been my experience that the British are prejudiced against American cars. British reviewers are never fair and balanced and appear to go out of their way to criticize. Your review does nothing to refute this opinion.

This reviewer states that the Cadillac has a poor ride and unsettled handling. However most reviews of the CTS-V state that its ride is superior to the Benz E63, a car your recently reviewed with no mention of its overly harsh ride, yet which every other reviewer has criticized. As for unsettled handling, how could the V tame and conquer the notorious Nurburgring if its ride was unsettled? The magnetic dampers that your magazine loves in the Audi A8 were actually developed by Cadillac and Audi produces their version under license.

Your review states that the Cadillac's interior is cheap and poorly built. However all other reviews that I have read praise its interior and one recent comparison test stated it was better assembled than the E63's interior.

The British built Jaguar XFR that your magazine loves so much is indeed a wonderful car. It is beautiful inside and out and has a great balance of ride and handling. However reviewers of other nations seem to feel the Jag is too soft and imprecise at the limit compared to the Cadillac which has repeatedly been demonstrated to be a star at every track it has been tested at.

The consensus of the many reviews of super sedans is as follows:

BMW M5: Techno-geek's delight. V-10 engine and exotic transmission are great for at-the-limit driving but bad at relaxed driving. Technology overkill.

Cadillac CTS-V: Fastest of all the super sedans on the track but with a with an acceptable ride on the road. Has the most power, the best brakes and finally a nice interior.

Jaguar XFR: Beautiful, balanced, not the best at any one thing except its interior, but very good at everything.

Mercedes E63: Fast, refined, prestigious but trying too hard to beat the M5 and so it suffers with a punishing ride.

Why don't you do a proper comparison test of the new CTS-V, the XFR, the E63 and the M5? Make sure they all have automatic transmissions. Do try to be impartial...

By wmontana on 9 December, 2009, 4:16pm

No surprise

Another British mag review touting the XFR, which has been third in almost every other review in the entire world except Britain. We get it...XFR, Aston Martin and Land Rover make the best and most unreliable vehicles in the world.

This coming from someone who is very serious about getting an XF. It is just that your credibility is the issue here.

By coladin on 9 December, 2009, 5:24pm

America feeling hard done by?

A quick responce to the two previous comments stating the review is unfair and biased towards UK/European cars.
With regards to the review of the ride being too harsh, other countries may find the ride acceptable but British roads are more pot-hole ridden and uneven than most so the CTS may be okay for the roads elsewhere but this does not mean it is suited to UK roads.
Also the interior is inferior to most european cars, American and Japanese consumers may have a different taste to us here in the UK/Europe but in general the materials look/are cheaper and in most American cars case not as well put together and the CTS is no exception going by pictures I've seen.
I am in no way saying I don't like the CTS, I think it would probably be the car I'd choose out of the entire group as I am more interested in performance and outward appearance than ride comfort and quality of finish but the review is fair for UK consumers.

By fcuk1_6 on 17 December, 2009, 1:53pm

More Euro Bias Not Considering Price

I have to laugh every time I read the Euro biased press declare that the interior (insert American car here) isn't up to the European rivals. The Jaguar XFR costs over £15,000 more than the Cadillac CTS-V, and the Merc E63 costs over £20,000 more than the Cadillac CTS-V. Cadillac could easily install a Bugatti Veyron like interior for the extra money if desired, but it doesn't represent good value - nor is it needed.

fcuk1_6: Seriously, "going by PICTURES I've seen"? Maybe you should go see a CTS-V (better yet drive one) in person rather than judging from pictures, and tell us if the marginally nicer interior in the Jag or Merc are worth spending more than £20,000! I'll think you'd find the Caddy more than acceptable, and would love having the extra money in your pocket. That's what Muscle Car's are all about. Performance value.

I'd have to agree with wmontana thoughts. The CTS-V has received overwhelming praise from the world motoring press, and has to be the Super Performance Saloon (and bargain) of the century. And yes, I've seen it and driven it (not just looked at PICTURES) and it is a beautiful car.

By shomann on 8 January, 2010, 11:12pm

You need to register to post comments. Existing members can log in below to comment, otherwise click here to join.



Sponsored Results

- Advertisement -

Pictures

Cadillac CTS-v
Cadillac CTS-v
Cadillac CTS-v
Cadillac CTS-v
Cadillac CTS-v
Cadillac CTS-v
Cadillac CTS-v

Sponsored Results

FIRST OPINION

    The Cadillac CTS-V has plenty of appeal. With that mighty supercharged V8 engine, it’s got character in abundance. Performance really is in the supercar league, and the US firm has done a decent job with the chassis. However, the car could do with being honed further and, as with many American vehicles, the CTS-V is let down by a poor-quality cabin. It’s left-hand drive only, too,and owners can expect hefty running costs. This is destined to be a very rare sight on UK roads.

 

AT A GLANCE

    Price: £59,000
    Engine: 6.2-litre s’charged V8
    Power: 556bhp
    Torque: 747Nm
    Transmission: Six-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
    0-60mph: 3.9 seconds
    Top speed: 175mph
    Econ/CO2: 19.2mpg/350g/km
    Standard equipment: 40GB hard drive, satellite navigation, Bluetooth connectivity, Bose stereo, 19-inch alloy wheels
    On sale: Now
     
    - Advertisement -