Has Mercedes finally produced a rival to the BMW M3? The firm barged its way to the top of the performance pack with the C63 AMG saloon, but now there’s this more focused coupé version, which promises to give well heeled buyers another alternative to the M3 outside of Audi’s RS5.
And it certainly looks the part. There are gaping air intakes to cool down both the engine and brakes, a big power bulge on the bonnet, wide wheelarches and 18-inch alloys. LED daytime driving lights and a bold black diffuser, complete with four chrome tailpipes, complete the looks.
Inside, the cabin is suitably luxurious and sporty, with glossy piano black and carbon fibre finishes, metal trim and a steering wheel covered with Nappa leather and Alcantara suede. The star of the show, though, is the 6.2-litre V8, which drives the rear wheels via a new seven-speed automatic gearbox.
In standard trim, the C63 produces 451bhp, but there is an optional AMG Performance Package, which boosts this to 480bhp. Throttle response is instant and explosive, with 0-62mph taking only 4.5 seconds. It’s backed up by a thunderous soundtrack that ranges from a hard-edged V8 rumble under full throttle, to pops and bangs from the exhaust when you back off.
Thanks to 600Nm of torque, overtaking is just a matter of flexing your right foot, but the new gearbox can take a lot of credit – it really makes the most of the performance available by shifting very quickly indeed.
It also has a wide range of modes, including Sport+, which is so good – performing multiple downshifts while you brake heavily on the approach to a corner – that you rarely need to take over and flick the paddles on the steering wheel.
With all that power going to the rear wheels, the C63 AMG Coupé can be very tail happy, but Sport mode provides a good compromise, allowing a little slip from the back end that’s easy and fun to control.
With a pliant but firm ride, great stability and meaty steering, the C63 AMG is accomplished in corners, too. It’s not quite as sharp as an M3, but it’s still more involving to drive than the Audi RS5. And it’s a very tempting alternative to both.
For an alternative review of the latest Mercedes C-Class visit our sister site carbuyer.co.uk
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
the saloon is much better to drive
Why o Why use an old engine?, the 6.2 V8 is notorious for it's "Terrible Economy" but still Mercedes are using it.
Very Sad.
I have a C63 and what a disaster using this old, hand built engine...I cry every night. Gimme a break! Sure it drinks but there is nothing out there that compares to the aural stimulation it provides, includiong the new 5.5 TT vacuum cleaner.
I have a C63 and what a disaster using this old, hand built engine...I cry every night. Gimme a break! Sure it drinks but there is nothing out there that compares to the aural stimulation it provides, includiong the new 5.5 TT vacuum cleaner.
What planet are you on? It's a 6.2 V8 not a 1.7TDi
But yes, I'd go for the saloon.
It’s time Mercedes offer another option to making power. Do you really need a 6.3 Liter engine that gives you 12 MPG to be fun in a car? And what’s this about RWD being more advantageous than a proper 4WD, well the Audi anyway? Every driven any of the GTR Skylines with the Attessa ETS 4WD system?
Merc can put a V6 twin turbo in this vehicle with a proper 4WD system. The car would be a lot better an give great mileage, not to mention being a lot safer on the road. Have you ever seen what a RWD car with so much power does in real world driving, especially with a little wet on the road? Get real.
And what a car to compare this car to, the M3. That car was used to dry the track when the Nissan GTR and Porsche 911 were testing, which the Porsche failed badly.
Caribbean, a twin-turbo V6 AWD AMG wouldn't be an AMG. What defines an AMG are the following two parameters: V8 thunder and rear tyres being quickly turned into smoke. The GTR is a crap car - sounds crap, ride is dreadful, weighs nearly two tons thanks to that stupid, needless AWD system and dual-clutch gearbox. A powerful RWD car in the wet is fine as long as the driver isn't a total idiot. As for fuel economy? This thing will only do 12MPG being hammered. In real life it'll do mid 20s to 30mpg - not bad for a 480bhp sports saloon.
And what's wrong with the M3? I personally don't like its V8 engine (look at my username), but it's still an epic car and a lot of fun - unlike the Playstation Datsun. Heck, the GTR is not even as much fun as an old Datsun 240Z... something wrong there. It's too hard-riding and uncomfortable to be a good road car and it's way too heavy to be a good track car, storming Nordschleife time notwithstanding.
I'll have my E63 AMG in estate form, please, in metallic grey, with the exhausts hidden (or, better still, removed altogether haha!) and the tailgate and front wings badged as a C220 CDI BlueEfficiency, thanks =D
...also means more understeer. The RS4 understeered a bit too much to stay with an M3 on a fast windy road or a track, the RS5 more so. The GTR likewise won't stay with a 911 GT3 on a B-road because of its weight and that understeer. RWD gives you the option to steer the car on the throttle, tighten your line into the corner...
At long last Mercedes has a real challenger to the M3. With a muscular coupé body, this C63 AMG looks fantastic on the road – and inside, it’s quality too. As with all AMG products, it’s not lacking in character, thanks to that incredible V8 engine, which provides deep-chested performance and an astonishing soundtrack. The lightning-quick seven-speed automatic gearbox is also a big plus, while the entertaining handling balance and fine long-distance ability are the icing on the cake. The M3 no longer has it all its own way.