MPs U-turn on plans to restrict novice drivers at the wheel

7 Jul, 2014 10:30am Nick Gibbs

The Government has axed planned restrictions on young drivers, despite research showing the move could save lives

The Government has abandoned the idea of placing safety restrictions on newly qualified young drivers, Auto Express has learned. 

The move comes despite a new RAC Foundation poll showing strong public support, as well as Government-funded research revealing how such restrictions could save 430 lives a year.

Instead, it’s been decided so-called graduated licensing would “restrict freedoms”. David Davies, head of the parliamentary road safety lobby PACTS, told Auto Express: “I’ve spoken to officials who’ve said it’s not going to happen. We’re obviously disappointed.” 

New car sales up 10 per cent in first six months of 2014

Under the original proposals, newly qualified drivers under 24 years of age faced a night-time driving curfew, a cut in the number of young passengers they could carry and lower alcohol limits. Nearly one in eight road casualties involves a driver aged 17-19, while a new RAC Foundation poll shows two-thirds of adult drivers supported the changes.

But despite strong support from MPs and road safety groups, the Government has backed down from publishing the ‘green paper’, originally promised for last spring, which kicks off the process for the changes to become law. 

“The current Government has repeatedly promised a green paper on young driver safety and repeatedly failed to produce it,” said Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the RAC Foundation. “If this was any other area of public health policy, there would be an outcry.” 

• CCTV camera car ban heralds a new ‘fair deal’ for UK motorists

According to Davies, the graduated scheme would have cut young drivers’ insurance premiums by “10-15 per cent”, too. He said that while there was lots of evidence of the scheme’s benefits, there was little to support a negative view, adding: “The Government has said it would limit young drivers’ access to jobs or education, but has done no detailed work assessing that.” 

The Department for Transport denied Davies’ claim that the Government had scrapped the plans, with a spokesman telling us: “We have decided we need more time to better understand the issues. It is vital we strike a balance between safety and not unduly restricting the freedom of young drivers.”


Comment: Another big idea falls by the wayside

By Chris Ebbs - Auto Express consumer editor

I’d like to say I was surprised to hear the Government had ditched its graduated driving licence plan, but it’s exactly what I’d expected.

As soon as the original green paper was delayed for the third time until after winter 2013, it had the feeling of a proposal that was falling down the list of priorities.

But it’s also another example of those in power promising to do something, and realising it’s not in their interest and scrapping it.

Google car - everything you need to know about Google's driverless car

The excuses may be that they’re doing more research, or that the plans would be too nannying, but numerous motoring body insiders have told me it’s because the Government is scared that bringing these controls in would put off young voters.

What’s worrying about this is that the powers that be are willing to drop the proposals despite overwhelming evidence that they could not only save young drivers’ lives, but also cut their bills.

Do you think the graduated driving licence plan was a good idea? Is greater regulation of new drivers needed at all? Let us know in the comments section below...

Disqus - noscript

As usual with our politicians they have plenty of good idea's but not the balls to back them up. Always full of hot air.

Don't be silly! There's an election in 11 months - lots of 18 year olds won't be voting Tory if they brought this in!

It's very simple, they realised that all the 17 and 18 year old shift workers would simply not be able to work.

Job figure stats vs safety stats!

"As usual with our politicians they have plenty of good ideas "

Really?

Rubbish. Restrictions would be at night, not during the normal working day. It's all about the elections. Shift workers can use mopeds.

That's what I mean when I say 'SHIFT WORKERS'

23 years old and working as a Mechanical engineer in the automotive industry. During the winter months it's not rare to both start and finish work outside the hours of daylight. I and many others would be pretty stuck.

These policies are created by power freaks who had their fun and now want to steal it from the younger generation.

No matter what legislation you have in place, people still need to go through a phase of 'experimenting' in driving. The roads aren't a playground but it's a natural process which can't be completely eradicated.

Only thing which can have an impact is educating new drivers of the risks more effectively.

Constant legislation, regulation and the erosion of freedom is not going to have a positive effect. I'm frankly shocked that the legislation has received such strong public support. It's such a shame that people are quick to approve of measures that don't affect them.

Although given the reason for the cancellation has Lib Dem fingerprints all over it I'd suspect their voting will get a boost from it.

...because everyone knows Mopeds are a model of safety and are far less dangerous for the driver than a car.

Sensible limitations would be something like restricting inexperienced drivers to cars with a high NCAP rating or requiring particular bits of safety kit (ABS, ESC, Automatic braking etc.).

Auto Express 1,347
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express - available as a weekly magazine and on your iPad. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!

Sponsored Links