Citroen C4 Cactus vs crossover rivals

3 Jul, 2014 4:50pm

Citroen’s bold C4 Cactus crossover has the sharp looks and value pricing to be a hit. Can it beat Peugeot and Dacia?

Citroen has been going through something of a renaissance of late. The introduction of the DS range saw a marked step up in quality that’s filtered down to the company’s standard models. Cars such as the recently launched C4 Picasso MPV also deliver edgy styling that helps Citroen to stand out from the crowd.

Now it’s time for another addition in the form of a new crossover: the C4 Cactus. This car combines innovative design with lightweight build and competitive prices – just like the legendary Citroen 2CV – and also adds efficient engines to the mix. It promises to offer family buyers something genuinely different.

To find out how the quirky Cactus compares to similarly priced rivals, we’ve lined up two models that challenge its value and style philosophies. The Peugeot 2008 is our current small crossover favourite, and we test the 1.6 e-HDi Allure model here. 

Citroen C4 Cactus

• Dacia Duster

Peugeot 2008

In contrast, the Dacia Duster offers bargain pricing and a rugged look that’s backed up by genuine off-road ability in 4x4 form. And in top-spec Laureate trim, it’s reasonably well equipped, too. So where does the new C4 Cactus fit? Is it a great value family car, or does it sacrifice practicality in the pursuit of radical design?

Head-to-head

Boot space

The C4 Cactus has a 358-litre boot, which is two litres down on the 2008, and 50 litres behind the Duster. The Citroen’s load lip is the same height as the Dacia’s, but the boot floor is a lot lower, and the tailgate opening is smaller, too. 

In addition, Citroen only offers a split-folding bench as an option. The Peugeot has the largest tailgate opening of this trio, while plastic runners in the boot floor help with loading large items.

Roof rails

All three cars have roof rails, while Dacia offers a £555 Touring Pack, which adds cross bars as well as a tow bar. Peugeot’s roof bars are £134, and there’s a wide variety of accessories to go on them. Feel and Flair versions of the C4 Cactus come with gloss black bars as standard, while a white finish is £50.

Efficiency

Citroen’s BlueHDi diesels deliver low emissions to keep running costs down. A CO2 output of 87g/km is 18g/km lower than the 2008’s, and 48g/km better than the Duster’s. The C4 Cactus is also 43g/km up on the 2WD Dacia, so it qualifies for free road tax and will have low company car costs.

Verdict

1st place: Citroen C4 Cactus

The new C4 Cactus is a quirky and welcome addition to the crossover sector. It has stand-out looks, a high-quality interior and is reasonably comfortable, but it’s not without fault. Rear space could be better, and the diesel favours efficiency over everyday usability, while a six-speed box needs to be added. But great value and a decent amount of standard kit secure its victory. 

2nd place: Peugeot 2008

The 2008 is still a classy and desirable crossover. It has reasonable boot space and shares the premium feel of the C4 Cactus, but the compromised dashboard and driving position count against it, while rear seat space is tight, too.

The biggest sticking point with the 2008 is that it’s slightly pricier to buy than the new Citroen, and will cost you more to run, too.

3rd place: Dacia Duster

 

There’s no shame in the Duster finishing in third place in this test. Its budget price tag and no-nonsense design and build provide charm by the bucketload, and if you want to carry five people and luggage, this is the car to go for.

It also has the bonus of four-wheel-drive versatility. However, running costs are on the high side.

Figures

Citroen C4 Cactus BlueHDi 100 Flair Peugeot 2008 1.6 e-HDi (115) Allure Dacia Duster 1.5 dCi Laureate 4x4
On the road price/total as tested £17,990/£20,425 £18,045/£19,445 £15,495/£15,495
Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000) TBC £8,275/45.9% £7,531/48.6%
Depreciation TBC £9,770 £7,964
Annual tax liability std/higher rate £502/£1,004 £612/£1,223 £704/£1,409
Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) £1,413/£2,355 £1,575/£2,625 £2,016/£3,360
Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost TBC/TBC/A/£0 20/£234/B/£20 10/£301/E/£130
Servicing costs TBC £16.99p/m (3y/30k) £489 (3yrs/36k)
Length/wheelbase 4,157/2,595mm 4,159/2,538mm 4,315/2,673mm
Height/width 1,480/1,729mm 1,556/1,739mm 1,630/1,822mm
Engine 4cyl in-line/1,560cc 4cyl in-line/1,560cc 4cyl in-line/1,461cc
Peak power/revs  99/3,750 bhp/rpm 113/3,600 bhp/rpm 108/4,000 bhp/rpm
Peak torque/revs  254/1,750 Nm/rpm 270/1,750 Nm/rpm 240/1,750 Nm/rpm
Transmission  5-spd man/fwd 6-spd man/fwd 6-spd man/4WD
Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel 45 litres/£75 50 litres/space saver 50 litres/repair kit
Boot capacity (seats up/down) 358/1,170 litres 360/1,172 litres 408/1,570 litres
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight 825/385/1,225kg 1,180/528/1,300kg 1,294/458/1,500kg
Turning circle 10.9 metres 10.4 metres 10.4 metres
Basic warranty (miles)/recovery 3yrs (60,000)/1yr 3yrs (60,000)/1yr 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs
Service intervals/UK dealers 12,500 (1yr)/196 20,000 (1yr)/300 12,000 (1yr)/127
Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. 26th/27th* 14th/26th* 5th/N/A
Euro NCAP: Adult/child/ped./stars N/A 88/77/72/5 74/78/28/3
0-60/30-70mph 11.3/10.6 secs 9.8/10.1 secs 11.6/12.1 secs
30-50mph in 3rd/4th 5.1/10.6 secs 3.8/5.2 secs N/A/5.0 secs
50-70mph in 5th/6th 13.3 secs/N/A 7.4/10.2 secs 7.0/10.8 secs
Top speed/rpm at 70mph  114mph/N/A 117mph/1,900rpm 104mph/2,600rpm
Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph  49.6/34.0/8.8m 58.5/41.3/12.1m 55.2/39.0/10.1m
Noise outside/idle/30/70mph 66/48/64/68dB 71/66/62/69dB 70/47/63/71dB
Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range 52.5/11.5/520 miles 47.1/10.4/518 miles 36.8/8.1/405 miles
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined  74.3/88.3/83.1mpg 60.1/78.5/70.6mpg 47.9/56.5/53.3mpg
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined  16.3/19.4/18.3mpl 13.2/17.3/15.5mpl 10.5/12.4/11.7mpl
Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket 144/87g/km/14% 161/105g/km/17% 206/135g/km/23%
Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/camera Six/yes/yes/yes Six/yes/yes/no Four/yes/£595/no
Auto box/stability/cruise control No/yes/yes No/yes/yes No/yes/yes
Climate ctrl/leather/heated seats Yes/£695/no Yes/£750/£150 No/£995/no
Met paint/tyre monitor/keyless go £495/yes/no £495/no/no £495/no/no
Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth Yes/yes/yes/yes £400/yes/yes/yes £300/yes/no/yes

 

Disqus - noscript

The roof bars on the Peugeot are standard from Access onwards so whoever said they cost £134 is clearly misleading AutoExpress.

A 825 kg weight for the cactus is amazing. That is equal to a 10 year old Smart fortwo,Ford KA or Lotus Elise. It almost defies physics that something so large can weigh that little.

Are you sure that youre correct Autoexpress?

The Duster is massively underpowered, and can't really compete in this class unless there's a new, more modern, and obviously more powerful engine available....

You base your assessment of these 3 vehicles on boot space, roof rails and efficiency? REALLY? No assessment of ride / handling, drive bility, cabin, space? REALLY?

This appears to be very poor journalism!?!?

it's not misleading.... It's just incorrect!

He is right Rugburn

Makes a change though from "just stroke the plastics" and "the badge".

The Citroen by far!

The C4 Cactus, although lightweight, is being pushed with 70 and 80 BHP engines, so will be alright driven solo, but put a porky family in it with fat teenage kids and it will suffer.

What exactly is the Dacia Duster doing in this comparison? It's not a crossover, not even close. Why didn't you add a Mazda MX-5 to make things clearer?

Pardon? I don't understand San Miguel

And it appears that the information on the roof bars is incorrect?!?!

.....and the mpg info hasn't been verified

....and nor has the boot capacity!

WTF?!?!

Silly little review

I think that's the weight of a base car with the lowest powered petrol engine. This diesel version is just over 1 tonne. AutoExpress - why am I having to explain this? Why not include the weight for the version you drove? Fairer comparison?

Poorly delivered story. Inaccurate. Insufficient detail. Comparison nor relevant. Crap really?

Out of the three it is the closest thing to a crossover.

Clever.

*Mazda CX-5 :)

No, MX-5.

I think MX-5 suggestion was sarcastic RugBurn

The Duster is definitely not underpowered I had the 1.5dCi 85 bhp and this would out pull other cars with 1.6 or even 2.0 litre diesel engines with 5 up and luggage.
The UK model has the 110 bhp engine so should be well up to the job.

85 bhp, really? That's less than my wife's Fiesta......

Get with the plot rugburn

It was a simple mistake RugBurn - get over it

Unlike you rugburn

Auto Express 1,347
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express - available as a weekly magazine and on your iPad. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!

Sponsored Links