Search Car Reviews



See all makes

Ford C-Max

Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec

The Ford C-Max gets a well-deserved facelift and improved cabin quality

Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec

Text: Sam Hardy / Photos: Pete Gibson

May 2007

 
New options also include Bluetooth telephone connectivity, a full-length panoramic glass sunroof and a choice of Sony stereos with an in-dash six-disc CD changer
As SEAT's Leon FR proves, good looks count for a lot when it comes to desirability. But it's not only racy hot hatchbacks which can benefit from stand-out styling - MPVs can, too.

Showing off a new design direction inspired by the larger S-MAX people carrier, the facelifted Ford C-MAX is ready to give Citroen's C4 Picasso some serious competition. It's available in the UK now - so Auto Express took a test drive.

First impressions are good, and it's clear that the styling changes have been very successful. Resembling a scaled-down version of the S-MAX, it gets a sporty nose with deep air intakes, faired-in spotlights and bold headlamp units.

At the rear, classy LED tail-lights finish the look off, while a new range of alloy wheel designs is available. Overall, the C-MAX - which drops the Focus part of its name as part of the update - has a much more distinctive appearance than its predecessor. The interior wasn't an area which needed much improvement, but the combination of an S-MAX-style dash and some neat orange ambient lighting raises the design and quality standards even higher.

The addition of a compact Z-shaped handbrake frees up space on the centre console for a 1.5-litre bottle holder, while the addition of an MP3 player socket is a neat touch.

New options also include Bluetooth telephone connectivity, a full-length panoramic glass sunroof and a choice of Sony stereos with an in-dash six-disc CD changer.

Buyers can order a Sport pack, which sharpens up the Ford's handling. But the stan-dard car we tried still offered excellent agility, with minimal body roll and steering that has lots of feedback. The C-MAX is still the best-driving compact MPV in its class by miles.

Contributing to that is the refined and very punchy 134bhp 2.0-litre TDCi diesel of our test car which, hooked up to a six-speed manual gearbox, returns an impressive 48.6mpg. There are a number of petrol options as well, including a 1.8-litre unit that runs on bioethanol.

Compared to the top-of-the-range £19,045 Titanium version we drove last week, this Zetec model's £17,745 price tag looks much more sensible, particularly as it's still equipped with air-conditioning and alloy wheels as standard.

Tell us about your car in our Driver Power survey.

What Next

Sponsored Results

2 Comments

some real facts

whoever wrote the article clearly didn't drive the car

The fuel consumption, driven with only the driver, very carefully, (slowly even) will not be better than 40 mpg ever. driven normally you will be lucky to get 36 mpg from a 2.0 diesel, by comparison my 2.4 5cyl Alfa diesel gives 45 mpg when driven in the same way. The power is 136 hp on both cars so It seems Alfa got it right in 2000 and Ford have taken several steps backwards.

The arrangement of the rear seats is fine for passengers but when they are folded down or tipped forwards the space created is very disappointing indeed and not really of any use for load lugging, the best mpv for load lugging is by miles the "old" 2000/2006 Galaxy or its variants, where the seats can be removed and a really flat solid floor is revealed, the new Galaxy along with the S-Max has silly folding deckchairs in the rear and these totally spoil the true concept of the MPV as demonstrated by the old Galax/.Sharan.

As regards the handling, there is a misconception that this car handles well., this is repeated in most reviews.... it does not handle at all well and will follow every groove, white line ( virtually a chalk mark in the road), it feels as if the front end is floating or on ice, if you put any load at all in the back it feels very very unsafe.and unstable...... I have come to this after driving, an oldish 2000 W ford galaxy which handles much much better, in fact the more load you put in a Galaxy, the better it handles.

I have driven many cars over the years, including rear wheel drive, front wheel drive, front and rear engined, big and very small and never driven one that feels so uncertain about where it is going when loaded.

By alfadriver on 31 December, 2009, 7:56pm

some real facts

whoever wrote the article clearly didn't drive the car

The fuel consumption, driven with only the driver, very carefully, (slowly even) will not be better than 40 mpg ever. driven normally you will be lucky to get 36 mpg from a 2.0 diesel, by comparison my 2.4 5cyl Alfa diesel gives 45 mpg when driven in the same way. The power is 136 hp on both cars so It seems Alfa got it right in 2000 and Ford have taken several steps backwards.

The arrangement of the rear seats is fine for passengers but when they are folded down or tipped forwards the space created is very disappointing indeed and not really of any use for load lugging, the best mpv for load lugging is by miles the "old" 2000/2006 Galaxy or its variants, where the seats can be removed and a really flat solid floor is revealed, the new Galaxy along with the S-Max has silly folding deckchairs in the rear and these totally spoil the true concept of the MPV as demonstrated by the old Galax/.Sharan.

As regards the handling, there is a misconception that this car handles well., this is repeated in most reviews.... it does not handle at all well and will follow every groove, white line ( virtually a chalk mark in the road), it feels as if the front end is floating or on ice, if you put any load at all in the back it feels very very unsafe.and unstable...... I have come to this after driving, an oldish 2000 W ford galaxy which handles much much better, in fact the more load you put in a Galaxy, the better it handles.

I have driven many cars over the years, including rear wheel drive, front wheel drive, front and rear engined, big and very small and never driven one that feels so uncertain about where it is going when loaded.

By alfadriver on 31 December, 2009, 8:19pm

You need to register to post comments. Existing members can log in below to comment, otherwise click here to join.



Sponsored Results

- Advertisement -

Pictures

Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec interior
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec mirror
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec wheel
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec headlight
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi Zetec engine

Sponsored Results

Find New Cars

Find your new Ford C-MAX with our new car search:

Find New Cars

FIRST OPINION

    With its sharp new look, the C-MAX has finally got the face it always deserved, while inside, cabin quality has also taken similar leaps forward. Meanwhile, the diesel engine adds both refinement and impressive fuel economy, and the Zetec trim brings new equipment, such as an MP3 stereo. It's flexible, too, while the icing on the cake is that the Ford is still the best-handling compact MPV around. In fact, the only thing the C-MAX is now missing is a seven-seat option.

 

AT A GLANCE

    Engine: 2.0-litre diesel, 134bhp
    0-62mph: 9.6 seconds
    Top speed: 124mph
    Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
    Economy: 48.6mpg
    CO2 emissions: 154g/km
    Price: £17,745
    Standard equipment: Six airbags, air-conditioning, MP3-compatible stereo, trip computer, alloy wheels
    On sale: Now
     
    - Advertisement -