
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
I took one look at the CX5 and thought that this was a joke... King of the crossovers? It looks like the car that jack built stealing a few idea's from here and there...
Why buy this car when there are so many good looking and interesting crossovers around ...
I think Mazda needs to think again...
Sorry 'davein greece' I think you've got it wrong.
The CX-5 looks like it's got what it takes to be king of the crossovers, much better space than any other and better fuel economy and CO2 rating...if it looks good in the flesh and drives well, why wouldn't it sell like hot cakes...
Stealing others ideas...not sure which ideas you mean but im pretty sure no one else is working on the engine etc the way Mazda are, it seems to be fashionable to only look at Hybrids or EVs now, so all credit to Mazda for sticking with the good old combustion engine.
Certainly the Ford Kuga and VW Tiguan have done well and I see no reason why this shouldn't, i might even look at buying one myself.
I also can't summon up any enthusiasm for this car. Apart from trying to ape the already ugly BMW X1 and coming up with a front end which looks even worse, the styling is otherwise indistinguishable from any other far-eastern crossover. Likewise the cabin looks just like the hired Mazda 3 I had a few years ago. Emissions and economy similar to a 1.6CR Skoda Yeti, but a bit quicker (and a lot more expensive). Reasonable handling and a firm ride - like most of the competition then. Sorry, nothing here to attract me at all.
I think this is a well proportioned, designed car. Far better looking than the BMW X1. The Emmissions and economy are very good, unthinkable a couple of years ago for this type of vehicle. Well done Mazda for the Skyactiv technology, this wil be a real boon for the brand. Being on a company car scheme with a 130g/km CO2 limit, I look forwards to its launch next year. Prepare to see a lot of these on the road.
Mazda's new design direction looks great, along with innovative 'skyactive' technology. Mazda deserve to do well with this and I think they will.
0-60mph in 9 secs and 62.8mpg, for a crossover?????????? WOW! Serious action without draining the credit card at the pumps. As for the styling, it'll do, there isn't a good looking crossover or SUV. Those Betty Boo lips at the front are a legacy of the design cartel that operates within the motor industry that says "This year you're all going to have to endure the dumbed down DUH! look front ends until we decide on another miserable dictat". So pitiful for the consumer and so much for free choice.
Now the But. That dash layout is ancient, clunky and horrible. Why not something more like the Maz3. At least a stylist has been involved in the Maz3. The CX-5 dash was obviously assembled by the under-manager in the spare parts dept. It looks dire. Who would want to spend their driving life sitting and staring at that? Oh....a dumb petrolhead I suppose. Is the Prius to be the only car with a dash that looks as though it belongs in the 21st century? Come on Mazda, you've spoilt the ship for a ha'porth of tar.
looks good from every angle except the front - pig ugly. nice to see some very fuel efficient diesel engines although 2.2 litre seems large for a smallish car to me when Nissan's new 1.6 litre diesel Qashqai can be had in a 7 seat 4WD configuration. this will have a hard job going again the likes of the Nissan Qashqai - the car that invented the crossover market !
The performance, emissions and economy figures look good but lets not forget that's for the 2WD model and when did manufacturer's figures ever equate to real world results? The enthusiasm should be toned down until it's been tested alongside it's rivals.
I don't think the car is ugly, but it isn't a looker either. Bland is a good description. Packaging may be good but that interior is nasty - it looks like something from the 1990's.
This would be a car you buy with your head as there's little to attract the heart - and only if it was cheaper. I don't think the Yeti, Sportage, ix35 or ASX have too much to worry about.
And in my own personal experience, Mazda know nothing about good customer service - my MX5 was the worst car ownership experience I've ever had.
Prototypes were promising. CX-7, a 4 year old model still looks much better. They should have stuck with the initial design.
This one is like putting together a Qashqai and an ASX!
Too bad, because Mazda has a reputation of revolutionary designs but this CX-5 just falls short of that.
Really Good looking C-Over. At least Mazda make their own diesels unlike Nissan who use Renault units. Bear in mind this one is more powerful and just as good on fuel as the Cashqai.
The CX-5 in all accounts in a great looking cross over, however, my concern is the pricing, I believe it needs to sit 7-10k below the basic CX-7 range listings. If Mazda can achieve this, then it will fly out the showrooms like no other Mazda in the past. Good times are finally at Mazda, let all us fans hope, that they can exceed current expectations relating to sytle, quality, technology, efficiency etc, set by the likes of Ford and Mercedes.
CX-5 in the entire account to a large cross looking for more, however, my concern is the price, I sure need to sit down list 7-10k range CX-7 basis. If Mazda can achieve this, it will fly out of showrooms like no other Mazda in the past. Good times are finally on the Mazda, let's hope all the fans, they can exceed expectations when it deals with many styles, quality, technology, efficiency, etc., are determined by people like Ford reviews
With the promise shown by this prototype, we can’t wait to drive the final production version of the CX-5. Practicality, ease of use and style are key in this class, and the car excels in all these areas. It’s good to drive, too, with some of the most powerful and efficient engines on the market. If Mazda can deliver on the promised retail price and equipment list, then there’s every reason to expect the CX-5 to lead the class.