Chrysler Ypsilon and Delta vs rivals

Chrysler is an ambitious brand. By launching new models into two of the most fiercely fought sectors in the UK market, it has signalled its intentions. Sadly, on the evidence of the Ypsilon, it faces an uphill struggle. Look past its quirky exterior and you’ll discover a car that lags a long way behind the supermini standard. Counting against it are the poor chassis, cheap-feeling cabin and weak refinement. The punchy TwinAir engine and low CO2 emissions are the only things working in its favour. If you’re looking for a refined and upmarket supermini, the VW Polo is a much better bet. It isn’t the most exciting choice, but is beautifully built and very refined, plus it delivers composed driving dynamics and a practical cabin. Fortunately for Chrysler, the Delta is a much brighter prospect. It’s boldly styled, spacious and relaxing to drive, and a welcome addition to the family hatch class. Yet it loses out to the SEAT in its first test by the narrowest of margins. The Leon has the edge on account of its sharper chassis, stronger performance and solid build quality.

What the Polo lacks in character, it makes up for in upmarket appeal. Top-quality build, refinement and a grown-up driving experience give the VW a clear victory here.

We had high hopes for the Ypsilon, but it falls well short of the class leaders. TwinAir engine and hi-tech options are impressive, but the car has too many flaws.

It’s not as radical to look at as the Delta, but the Leon is better to drive and more solidly engineered. Cabin space could be better, yet this isn’t enough to deny the car victory.

If you want something different, the Delta is worth a look. Some interior materials feel cheap and it’s not great to drive, but it’s capable and has character.