Volkswagen CC review

Our Rating: 
4
4.0/5.0
By Auto Express Test TeamComments

The four-door Volkswagen CC is a great cruiser, with efficient engines and enough kit to compete with more expensive rivals

For: 
Stylish design, comfortable ride, lots of kit
Against: 
Not very fun to drive, steering lacks feel, expensive

Sponsored Links

The Volkswagen CC is designed as a premium four-door coupe which challenges the Audi A5 Sportback and the BMW 3 Series. The stylish CC stands out in its class, though, thanks to a facelift in late 2011, which made the nose more imposing and saw the addition of an attractive chrome grille and bi-xenon headlamps complete with LED daytime running lights. Prior to the facelift, the Volkswagen CC was called the Volkswagen Passat CC, but this name was dropped. The reborn CC gained a sweeping roofline and a neat trim which edged the design past that of the Passat's. There are two trim levels to choose from: the regular CC model and a sporty CC GT version. Both specifications come with DAB radio, Bluetooth hands-free phone connectivity, touch-screen navigation, sports suspension and dual-zone climate control. Meanwhile, CC GT versions get Nappa leather upholstery, brushed aluminium trim inserts, electronically adjustable suspension, bigger alloy wheels, cruise control, heated front seats and parking sensors. Volkswagen also offer a range of hi-tech safety accessories available on both models. These include lane keep assistance, autobrake, and a fatigue detection system that alerts drivers when they're nodding off. The only drawback is that most of these extras aren't included in the high price. With the Volkswagen CC you'll get the option of a crisp 158bhp 1.8 TSI plus a sporty 207bhp 2.0 which turns the CC into a competitive performance car. Opt for the super-efficient 2.0 diesel, though, and keep running costs relatively low. The Volkswagen Passat CC should also hold its value come resale time.

Our choice: CC 2.0 TDI BlueMotion Tech

Styling

4.2

The Volkswagen CC is available in two specifications - entry-level, regular CC and top-spec CC GT. Both versions feature an upmarket chrome grille, a smart lower bumper and LED daytime running lights incorporated into piercing bi-xenon headlamps. The premium look is completed by scalloped sides, a sweeping roofline and further LED lights at the rear. The interior, unsurprisingly, looks pretty similar to the Passat's, meaning the controls are simple and easy to use. The interior also features an analogue clock which was sourced from the latest Volkswagen Phaeton luxury saloon and the top-spec CC GT model comes in a range of Nappa leather finishes. The sporty GT versions also get 18-inch alloys, heated front seats, cruise control, plus front and rear parking sensors. The entry-level CC still comes with a generous amount of equipment, though, with 17-inch alloy wheels, Bluetooth, DAB radio, automatic wipers, front sports seats and dual-zone air-con. Special seats are also available with a massage function. On top of this, buyers can specify an automatic tailgate which opens when you wave your foot under the rear bumper.

Driving

3.8

The Volkswagen CC gets the best of the Passat's engine line-up - choose from the 1.4-litre turbo petrol that produces 158bhp or opt for the 2.0-litre TSI turbocharged petrol with 207bhp. There's also a 2.0-litre turbodiesel which comes in 138bhp and 168bhp versions. All models are available with six-speed manual or six-speed DSG automatic gearboxes, while the 1.4 gets a seven-speed DSG. The 1.4-litre petrol will be sufficient for most buyers' needs - it manages 0-62mph in 8.5 seconds and has a top speed of 137mph. Meanwhile, the 128bhp 2.0 TDI reaches 0-62mph in 9.8 seconds and has a top speed of 133mph. All models come with sports suspension, but the top-spec GT model gets adaptive dampers which allows the suspension to be changed between Normal, Comfort and Sport modes. In the latter of these modes, the handling is surprisingly sharp but the steering doesn't match up.

Reliability

4.3

As the Volkswagen CC is fairly uncommon on UK roads, it hasn't featured yet in our Driver Power customer satisfaction survey, but Volkswagen did achieve a solid ranking of 16th in our list of top manufacturers. Plus, the previous generation Volkswagen Passat CC finished an impressive 34th in the 2013 Top 100 survey. The Volkswagen CC hasn't been put through the rigors of a Euro NCAP crash test yet, either, but the Volkswagen Passat - on which it is largely based - was awarded with the full five-star rating. Volkswagen also offer an abundance of hi-tech safety accessories available as options, including fatigue detection, active head restraints, a blind spot warning system and lane keep assist. Meanwhile, autobrake brings the car to a halt at low speed if it senses an imminent collision. Further to this, drivers can specify automatic adjustment of the headlight beams, and there's a system that recognises road signs and displays them on the dashboard.

Practicality

4.2

Following the redesign of the CC, Volkswagen placed more importance on style than they did on the practicality factor. The new sweeping roofline, for example, really does intrude on headroom in the rear. While the original Passat CC had two individual back seats, this one gets a three-seat rear bench and passengers will agree that the central seat is very cramped. Despite the cars larger dimensions, boot space doesn't match up to the Passat saloon - the CC only offers 452 litres worth of space. Having said that, the back seat splits and folds - at the simple touch of a button located in the boot - to allow owners to carry awkward sized items. Plus, the CC has an impressive towing capacity of 1,800kg. There's also a range of storage cubbies including a refrigerated glove compartment. 

Running Costs

4.2

The Volkswagen CC comes with a highly efficient 2.0-litre TDI BlueMotion Technology diesel engine, which returns 61.4mpg and emits just 120g/km of CO2. If you choose to combine this with the DSG auto, you still get returns of 53.3mpg and 134g/km of CO2. Those in pursuit of performance should opt for the GT 2.0-litre TSI petrol engine, which goes from 0-62mph in 7.3 seconds. Be warned, though, it only manages 38.7mpg and if you combine this with emissions of 169g/km you get a very expensive vehicle. Unsurprisingly, the petrol models aren't quite as clean or frugal - the 1.4 TSI manual claims 44.8mpg and emits 147g/km of CO2, and with an auto box these figures change to 45.6mpg and 144g/km of CO respectively. While no version is especially cheap to insure, the more powerful 2.0 TSI petrol gets the highest insurance group of the range.

Disqus - noscript

Not a bad car. A lot for a VW though. I'd expect people after this type of car don't want a VW (probably why I see so few about).

The interior is the same as the previous gen Passat. Doesn't match up to the outside at all.

The interior is actually fantastic. Excellent build quality. Much better than say an Audi A4. Yes it's based on the original Passat, but the materials used are upgraded, new trim inserts, lighting, speedo, door panels and nappa leather seats make the interior feel more special than it would seem on paper.

Pathetic over priced German unreliability with an interior plucked out of a worthless repmobile.

Its clear to some folk at least, that no matterf what AE writes about its paymasters at VW, that not everyone wants aborted VW foetus cars like the Golf and Passat that are nothing but overpriced, recycled trash.

Surprised Ste and Jack aren't here bashing one out over this.

This always looks like the Mercedes similar model to bloated and wrongly proportioned to me . plus its just a old Passat which in turn is just on Golf chassis which is just a Skoda hey ho

You'd be better off with a Skoda Superb - and so would your wallet be.

m8 behave and Know what your talking about. VW are based on their quality. Same as their sister companies, Audi, Seat, Bentley, buggatii, Porsche, Lamborghini.

It looks like a last century car, inside and outside. Oh no, you still control the lights with a large dial on the dashboard? That alone worth paying the premium.

The same quality that seems them in the bottom 10 of most reliable cars on sale today? Dont believe me search on here for german reliability.

STFU you ignoramus. Read Andy's very salient remarks below.

Homer, why do you make antagonistic comments on nearly every article?! Very sad.

You do not get Nappa leather as standard, you got get some horrid looking tweed. And it is a total mix bag of what has been rolled out on this old chassis; Antony R mentioned above old Passat Chassis, that was once a golf, a golf plus, A Seat Leon, An Altea, Altea XL, Numerous Skodas and god knows what else!

AE now you've had your bung from VW you could start being honest; the NHTSA the American equivalent of NCAP (well it's not, it is much more stringent) is an independent American government safety advisory board therefore not 80% owned by a manufacturer (like NACAP is by Renault) so their tests are not designed to sell cars with a dodgy 5 star rating system, they are designed to save lives.

The Passat CC scored a serious fail when they did the head light to head light test, it was so bad that the A pillar snapped in half and the floor collapsed (NCAP wont do it as 90% of European cars will fail it) ever wondered why a rear crash test is not applied to the NCAP rating? Because Renault own it and their cars will fail. The rest of the car makers (Volvo aside) are equally to blame as they get the 5 stars, sell more cars and they are happy. Knowing full well a 5 star car is quite frankly seriously inadequate.

If the EU can rule our cucumbers are not straight enough why can't they set up and independent body that will over see all car safety testing? Again it goes back to bungs. The big three German car makers, Fiat and the French trio should be ashamed as they are risking your lives and all to save a few pounds. The revenue they bring in the EU would not want to fall out with them. When Volvo offered them all SIPS and WIPS free of charge why did not one car maker implement these life saving devices? Because they know enough gullible people will still buy their cars. Shouldn’t an independent test be set up for these and then make them compulsory?

Volvo's crash testing regime, and the safety features of their cars are driven by investigation of real life accidents as part of a long-standing co-operation with a major Swedish insurance company. A good few years ago when I last checked, they were boasting of data from over 20,000 real accidents being fed back into the crash protection design of their cars. It's also comforting that Volvo were promoting crashworthiness long before it registered on most people's buying radar, much less became fashionable.

Last updated: 1 Oct, 2013
AEX 1330
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express - available as a weekly magazine and on your iPad. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!

Sponsored Links