Nissan GT-R Nismo 2014 review

27 Jun, 2014 12:00pm Jack Rix

Nissan's GT-R didn't really need to get any faster but it has - we drive the 592bhp Nissan GT-R Nismo

Verdict

3
We’re huge fans of the obsessive engineering that goes into every GT-R, and the Nismo is undoubtedly the pinnacle of the breed. The way it grips, turns and accelerates needs to be experienced to be believed, but as a road car it’s compromised. We averaged 14mpg on a long trip and the rock hard ride relegates driving it to an occasional treat. Its status as a future classic is assured, but if you want to use your GT-R regularly, we’d stick with the standard version.

There are easier jobs than creating the ‘ultimate’ version of the Nissan GT-R - a car already capable of 0-62mph in 2.8 seconds and face-warping cornering speeds. But that was the brief given to Nismo, Nissan’s fast expanding performance arm, and the incredible 592bhp GT-R Nismo is the result.

When we first drove it last November we had two quick laps on a track near Tokyo, but this time around our 350-mile drive stretched from the Nurburgring in Germany back to the Auto Express HQ in London, across every type of road you can imagine. It was a fitting route, too, as the GT-R Nismo was developed primarily on the Nurburgring and draws heavily on Nismo’s racing expertise, but to succeed it needs to work on public roads as well.

Nissan GT-R Nismo nose

The extra 49bhp and 22Nm of torque comes from larger-capacity turbos - taken from the GT3 race car - an upgraded fuel pump and revised ignition timing. As a result there’s a moment of lag while the turbos fill their lungs, followed by a blitz of acceleration that can be sustained as long as you can hold your nerve. We encountered a stretch of derestricted German autobahn and clung on until 175mph at which point the bumpy surface and proximity of the barrier got the better of us, but even then the Nismo was still pulling hard. 

Nissan Concept 2020 Vision GT revealed at Goodwood

It might seem absurd to test a car at those sort of speeds, but every part of the GT-R Nismo, right down to larger bolts to hold the wheels on, has been built for speed - and the faster you go, the more cohesive it becomes. For example, pull the right paddle behind the wheel with the throttle planted at 100mph and the six-speed gearbox slams home the next ratio instantly, and the sensory onslaught continues. At lower speeds though, whether in auto or manual mode, the gearbox often gets confused and hesitates before dropping into a lower gear with a violent ‘thunk’.

Nissan GT-R Nismo seats

It’s a similar story with the firmer spring and Billstein adaptive dampers – blasting around a smooth, sweeping corner the body control is other-wordly, the steering talks to you about the road surface and the faster you go the harder it grips. But drive over a speed bump, or even a manhole cover, in any of the three settings – Comfort, Normal and R – and you’ll soon lose your sense of humour.

Squeeze the throttle from a rolling start and it makes an ominous noise - much like a jet aircraft taking off - as the intakes gobble huge chunks of air, the turbos start to fizz and the tyre and wind noise crescendo. But blip the throttle at a stand still and it sound more like a home appliance than a £125,000 supercar.

Nissan GT-R Nismo

Nismo has taken the GT-R to the wind tunnel and added new bumpers and side skirts plus a carbon boot-lid and rear wing. The result is an extra 100kg of down force at 186mph compared to the standard car, but it’s not exactly what you’d call pretty. Brutal, yes, which will appeal to the GT-R’s cult following, but the casual supercar browser is unlikely to be seduced by its looks.

And that’s the sticking point with the GT-R Nismo – it’s an astonishingly fast car, and a masterclass in how to get a 1.7-tonne lump of metal from A to B in the shortest possible time, but it’s singular focus on speed is also its downfall. On paper it’s the Usain Bolt of the car world, but it lacks emotion and never feels as thrilling as the numbers suggest, while the powertrain is jerky at low speeds and the ride is punishing. On the right road, given the right conditions it’s mind-blowing, but the other 90 per cent of the time the standard GT-R is just as impressive, £47,000 cheaper and easier to live with.

Disqus - noscript

I did a super car experience day and drove a standard GT-R and I can tell you that it is also rock hard and has a jerky whiney drive train. Fabulous to drive and a million miles better than I was able to test it with my limited skills but a track experience day is the only place I would want to drive one, they have no appeal to me for ownership.

3 stars because it only managed 14MPG? Seriously? I'd be astonished if a GTR buyer bought one then did everything possible to keep the MPG up.... The point of this car is completely lost on AE which is clearly evident in their absurd rating.

Perhaps Car Reviewers ought to review cars from different categories against criteria specific to that category, i.e. sports cars against performance, handling etc and family cars against economy, comfort et....

Sorry I think that AE are biased to this car and other none German cars. This car is clearly a 100% track focused car, which will more than likely be trailered to the track by owner. It was made to take corners flat out and at great speed, which it does. This car will be compared with the up and coming 911 GT3 RS which will cost at least £150,000 +. Yes the GTR is heavy and expensive but very few cars at any price have the same level of performance and engineering has the GTR does. Im sure that the owner will have more than one car for day to day commutes.

Wasn't this the car that Sir Chris Hoy crashed at the Goodwood festival of speed, LOL

You would make a good point if competitive cars managed only 14mpg and were uncomfortable to drive on the roads. But other cars do better.

And the engineering on the GT-R is very Playstation, and people appreciate the purer engineering more than they appreciate the computer.

Lucky we got to it first...

Read the full review. Here's a useful quote as to why it scored three stars - "On the right road, given the right conditions it’s mind-blowing, but the other 90 per cent of the time the standard GT-R is just as impressive, £47,000 cheaper and easier to live with."

You could say that about ANY track focussed variant of a sports coupe though, and I bet they don't get downgraded in stars ;-)

The star rating is hard to ignore when you look at a review, but if you're looking for a pure track car then it's easy to ignore criticisms in the text that don't apply to you - and disregard the score.

I agree. IMO the standard GTR is an awsome car let alone this NISMO version.

It may be brutally fast in both a straight line and around corners, but there are other aspects of a supercar which are just as important. For example, the ride quality, the gearbox, the power delivery of the engine, the quality of the interior, the design of both interior and exterior, the cool factor/ charcacter, the pedigree... etc etc.
In every one of the above facets, the Nissan is nowhere near the Porsche 911 GT3 RS or even the Audi R8 V10.
That, ladies and gentlemen is the reason why AE only awarded it 3 stars. In my opinion even that was far too generous.

At a glance

Price: £125,000 (est)

Engine: 3.8-litre twin-turbo V6

Transmission: Six-speed twin-clutch auto, four-wheel drive

Power/torque: 592bhp/652Nm

0-62mph: 2.6 seconds (est)

Top speed: 200mph (est)

Economy: 24mpg (est)

CO2: 275g/km

On sale: September