
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
Sure this is a great city car, but it looks remarkably similar to the mid nineties Arosa, with a shorter bonnet; design progression appears to be very slow here!
VW up! Would be my choice, although still looking forward to the new Panda first drive.
I'm surprised AE said the interior is rock solid. From the pics it just looks low rent and dated already. No way near the VW or Skoda, it will struggle here.
Sorry guy's but the Mii looks no more like the old Arosa as the Up or citigo does and the Interior looks fresh and clean, this would be nice choice if I was to go for one of the 3.
Cheaper than the up and better looking than the citigo, I bet SEAT do very well with this.
No one will buy this if the story about VW's up! leasing incentive turns out to be true. Every young driver in the country will gravitate to the car that has insurance, road tax and servicing included in a leasing cost that is less than most pay for insurance.
I think it's cool. I would buy this over the Up...it's better looking.
We recently purchased a Kia Picanto (2011 shape). The interior and exterior looks far superior for the Kia in my opinion. This car is unimaginitive and the interior looks very low rent and dated indeed.
All three VW-group cars seem good, and the styling is clean and simple. I do think they've missed a trick by not getting them under 100 g/Km, though. Like brooky_agb, I think my new 2011 Picanto 1.0 Air 3-door looks better. It also has a 7-year warranty, gets better fuel economy and free tax/ no London congestion charge, and that's without stop-start...
I'll stick by my opinion of the 1997 Arosa, compare these two pics with the new Mii and there's really not a lot in, nearly 15 years separates these cars. Design-wise at least, it's not moved the game on a lot!
front three quarter view:
http://www.chcekupicauto.pl/seat-arosa-10-50km-1997-3790/foto1/
rear three quarter view:
http://www.carexpert.ru/models/foto/seatar/4.htm
It's about time Seat, and indeed Skoda were given a small car to sell. When the Arosa appeared in 1997, I was just about to buy when the local dealership closed. In fact from then until the Arosa was withdrawn, it was pretty difficult to find a Seat dealer, although there are a lot more now. The Arosa and the VW Lupo were super city cars, but the decision to stop making them meant that the Aygo, C1 and 107, for example, were given a fairly clear field. The fact that VW didn't let Skoda or Seat make a version of the Fox is to their credit. Never was such a dull car conceived in recent years. Not even reasonable emission levels to make it a cheap car to run.
Why not dare to put something distinctive on it? This is a very basic design. I m sure it will be a very nice car but I don't anticipate to see it.
It looks like a great little car, and SEAT really do deserve a bigger percentage of the market, if only they didn't keep rebadging VW's and Audis (Exeo, Alhambra etc) and weren't so behind every other manufacturer.
At least Skoda are using VW chassis's but going back to the drawing board.
Still rather this than an overpriced VW or a rubbish korean car.
It looks like a great little car, and SEAT really do deserve a bigger percentage of the market, if only they didn't keep rebadging VW's and Audis (Exeo, Alhambra etc) and weren't so behind every other manufacturer.
At least Skoda are using VW chassis's but going back to the drawing board.
Still rather this than an overpriced VW or a rubbish korean car.
The Mii is a likeable, useful little city car with a lot to offer young and older buyers alike. The keen styling, peppy engine and low price tag give it strong appeal, and it should definitely help SEAT attract new customers to the brand. The forthcoming five-door model will be a genuine alternative to conventional superminis too, but the Mii might struggle to differentiate itself from its sister cars, as the VW and Skoda could prove to be its fiercest competiton.