MG3 vs rivals

MG3 vs Dacia Sandero and Skoda Citigo
3 Oct, 2013 9:30am

MG has avoided extermination more times than the Doctor. But can the new MG3 stay out of the clutches of the best budget buys?

Like the hero of Doctor Who, MG has been through a few regenerations over the past 50 years. However, after a decade
of uncertainty, the brand is out to recapture former glories under Chinese ownership.

The slow-selling MG6 has failed to make an impact, but the all-new MG3 supermini has all the right ingredients: neat styling, a spacious interior and bargain pricing.

MG3 review 

Dacia Sandero review

Skoda Citigo review 

Low insurance costs and a wide range of personalisation options add even more showroom appeal to the practical five-door hatch. Prices range from £8,399 for the entry-level 3 Time model to £9,999 for the top-spec 3 Style tested here.

However, the MG3 isn’t the only car to mix supermini style and practicality with a city car price. The no-frills Dacia Sandero can’t match the MG3 for style or brand appeal, but it’s just as spacious and well equipped. Plus, it costs even less: our Laureate 900cc TCe test car is £8,795.

But do these cut-price contenders make more sense than a city car? Skoda’s Citigo mixes small car running costs with lots of space and grown-up dynamics. Can the MG see off the challenge?


Despite its size and power advantage, the MG3 failed to stamp its authority at our test track. It led the way in the 0-60mph sprint, with a time of 10.1 seconds, but the 1.5-litre engine’s gutless low-down response meant it could only pull out a narrow advantage over the 1.0-litre three-cylinder Skoda during our in-gear tests. The Citigo felt livelier than its figures suggest, but neither car could match the turbocharged Dacia for effortless pace.

Running costs

You’d expect these value-for-money cars to be very cheap to run – and the Skoda in particular doesn’t disappoint. Unfortunately, this is where the MG really struggles: it’s hobbled by weak residual values, poor fuel economy and relatively high CO2 emissions.


The MG wins the space race thanks to its roomy cabin. Not only is there a lot more legroom for rear passengers than in either of its rivals, but you can also just about squeeze three adults across the back bench. The interior has lots of useful storage for odds and ends and the 285-litre boot matches those of most mainstream superminis. Our only concern is that the low-rent cabin doesn’t feel durable enough to deal with family life.

1st place - Citigo

It’s another victory for the small Skoda. Unlike its rivals here, the Citigo doesn’t feel like a bargain-basement car to drive and own. It’s solidly built, well equipped and boasts very grown-up driving dynamics. And while it’s not as roomy as the other two cars, there’s more than enough space for most buyers.

2nd place - Sandero

The Dacia and MG are closely matched. But in the final reckoning, the Sandero gets the nod, thanks in no small part to its lower price, eager engine and smoother ride. It doesn’t look as trendy as the MG and isn’t as sharp to drive, but it has a more durable cabin and should cost less to run.

3rd place - MG3

MG shouldn’t be too disappointed with third place. The newcomer is great value, neatly styled and spacious, while the well sorted handling makes it good fun to drive. However, it’s held back by a mediocre engine, rigid ride and low-rent cabin. Equally disappointing are the poor economy and emissions.

Skoda Citigo Elegance 1.0 75 5dr Dacia Sandero Laureate 0.9 TCe MG3 Style 1.5
On-the-road price/total as tested £10,460/£10,920 £8,795/£8,795 £9,999/£11,270
Residual value (after 3yrs/30,000) £4,602/44.0% £3,896/44.3% £3,250/32.5%
Depreciation £5,858 £4,899 £6,749
Annual tax liability std/higher rate £229/£458 £262/£524 £373/£746
Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) £1,546/£2,576 £2,057/£ 3,428 £2,309/£3,849
Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost 2/N/A/A/£0 7/N/A/C/£30 4/N/A/E/£125
Cost of 1st/2nd/3rd service £499 (3yrs/30k) £489 (3yrs/36k) TBC
Length/wheelbase 3,563/2,420mm 4,058/2,589mm 4,018/2,520mm
Height/width 1,478/1,641mm 1,518/1,733mm 1,507/1,729mm
Engine 3cyl in-line/999cc 3cyl in-line/898cc 4-cyl in-line/1,498cc
Peak power 74/6,200 bhp/rpm 89/5,250 bhp/rpm 105/6,000bhp/rpm
Peak torque 95/3,000 Nm/rpm 135/2,500 Nm/rpm 137/4,750Nm/rpm
Transmission 5-spd man/fwd 5-spd man/fwd 5-spd man/fwd
Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel 35 litres/sealant 50 litres/sealant 45 litres/sealant
Boot capacity (seats up/down) 251/959 litres 320/1,200 litres 285/1,262 litres
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight 865/425kg/N/A 962/558/1,100kg 1,155/530kg/N/A
Turning circle/drag coefficient 9.8 metres/0.33Cd 10.7 metres/N/A 10.4 metres/N/A
Basic warranty (miles)/recovery 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs 3yrs (60,000)/3yrs  3yrs (60,000)/3yrs 
Service intervals/UK dealers 10k miles (1yr)/135 12k miles (1yr)/127 15k miles (1yr)/46
Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. 2nd/7th N/A N/A
Euro NCAP: Adult/child/ped./points 89/80/46/5 80/79/57/4 N/A
0-60/30-70mph 13.8/14.2 secs 11/10.3 secs 10.1/10.4 secs
30-50mph in 3rd/4th 7.2/11.2 secs 4.9/7.1 secs 6.7/9.2 secs
50-70mph in 5th/6th 15.3 secs 12.4 secs 14.8 secs
Top speed/rpm at 70mph 107mph/3,100rpm 109mph/2,750rpm 108mph/3,100rpm
Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph 50.7/35.5/9.1m 48.5/34.6/8.7m 48.2/35.1/9.0m
Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range 48.7/10.7/375 miles 36.6/8.0/403 miles 32.6/7.1/323 miles
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined  55.4/76.3/67.3mpg 44.1/65.7/56.5mpg 37.7/57.6/48.7mpg
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined  12.2/16.8/14.8mpl 9.7/14.4/12.4mpl 8.3/12.7/10.2mpl
Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket 134/98g/km/11% 178/116g/km/15% 200/136g/km/19%
Airbags/Isofix/rear parking sensors Four/yes/£310^ Four/yes/£250 Six/yes/yes
Air-conditioning/leather/heated seats Yes/no/yes Yes/£600/no Yes/part (£500)/no
Auto gearbox/stability/cruise control £305/yes/£310^ No/yes/yes No/yes/yes
Metallic paint/xenons/keyless go £460/no/no £495/no/no £395/no/no
Sat-nav/USB connection/Bluetooth Yes/no/yes £250/yes/yes No/yes/yes

Disqus - noscript

All rubbish cars.

Bus and train passes have more value.

Surely your headline should be "...The Doctor", i think "...the Doctor" refers to your local GP.
I am curious to know how well this new MG3 stacks up against the old MG ZR in its final form prior to bankruptcy.

That would be a hugely interesting road test. So what you reckon everyone, which would win? ZR or 3?

that's the Snugburies dalek!

I have no idea what the little Skoda is doing in this test. It doesn't even belong here.
Its from a class below hence it is the least spacious and the most underpowered in this test.
Although ironically it happens to be the most expensive out of these three cars.

Pretty similar between the ZR 105 and the '3 I would think.

I'm pretty sure this result is a simple way of saying that if you have around £10,000 to spend, your money would be better spent on the Skoda than trying to buy a bigger "budget brand" car. Or go second-hand!

Oh dear

Its there because they already have it on long term test!

Oh dear, the local troll is back. Go fap over your ferraris.

So the MG3 has fallen flat on its face before it has even gone on sale. No surprises there then. The only cars they will be able shift will be to themselves as demonstrators/courtesy cars, with a few hundred flogged off as hire cars (does anyone want a hire car this small?) or sold at half price through Motorpoint like they had to do with the 6. Then again, maybe they could sell a few for delivering takeaways! It's obvious that a car like the Citigo will be able to wipe the floor with a dud like this.

For a start, we should take no notice of comments from people who have not even driven an MG3! Secondly, I have driven a demonstrator and I was highly impressed. I have driven one on a Track Day at Silverstone and I was driven in one by an experienced racing driver at the same Track Day. The car handles extremely well and was keeping up with higher powered cars due to its excellent brakes and adhesion through the bends. As regards how it compares with the MG ZR, Paul Luti (a very talented racing driver) actually overtook a ZR 160 and a ZR190 when he tried a standard MG3 at a test day. I think that says a lot about the performance of the MG3. There will be an article on the MG3 at the Track Day in the November issue of MGEnthusiast magazine. Read that and then decide if you would rather be seen in, let alone drive, a Skoda or a Dacia!

Whats a ZR190, there was never a production car of that figure made by MGR, as no one drives like a professional driver, this is irrelevant.

It is day to day driving that counts, and thats where the MG3 does little to support its looks and history, wind noise from 49mph up is horrendous, the lack of grunt in overtaking at motorway speeds make this a bit of a dog to own, run and live with.

The insurance costs will be very cheap, but the fuel consumption and VED will not be, if you can put up with noise, no grunt, high fuel consumption and high yearly taxation, then go for it.

I would much rather be seen in a Skoda from 25 years ago than this Mediocre Garbage MG with stripes!