MINI Cooper 2014 review

30 May, 2014 12:45pm Oliver Kew

Verdict on more grown-up new three-cylinder turbo MINI Cooper on UK roads

Verdict

5
The new MINI Cooper is the sweet spot of the latest MINI range. It’s cheaper, yet more fun than the Cooper S hot hatch. Plus it’s a higher-quality, more resolved everyday runabout than the old Cooper. Unlike the new Cooper S, this MINI has retained its fun factor. Just be wary of getting carried away with the options list for this highly customisable icon.

The new MINI Cooper is one of the few everyday cars to lay claim to genuine supercar pedigree. Its new engine, a 1.5-litre turbocharged three-cylinder, is virtually identical to the powerplant you’ll find in the back of BMW’s showcase, the i8 supercar.

The Cooper’s power and torque outputs of 135bhp and 220Nm aren’t particularly exotic, but they are 16bhp and 60Nm up on the old 1.6 Cooper’s. Throw in a 10.5mpg gain (to a claimed 61.4mpg) and a 32g/km cut in emissions (now 107g/km), and it’s clear that although the Cooper’s engine is smaller, it definitely punches above its weight.

Maximum torque from just 1,250rpm makes the new car amusingly rapid from getaway. It sprints from 0-62mph in 7.9 seconds – a noticeable 1.2 seconds faster than a MkII Cooper.

It also sounds more interesting than the blary new Cooper S hot hatch, with a bass-heavy three-cylinder thrum that’s fun on full throttle, but muted at idle, or a fast cruise. In fact, the entire car is more refined than before; the lack of noise alone is uncanny.

MINI Cooper 2014 UK rear tracking

This new, mature image is helped by a much-needed cabin update. It’s more ergonomically rational, with door-mounted electric window switches and comprehensive dials behind the steering wheel, plus it benefits from smarter trim than the plasticky previous model.

With a lighter engine up front, the Cooper has a keener appetite for bends than the four-cylinder Cooper S, and an entertainingly nimble set-up, despite the latest MINI’s generous footprint.

A low-set, BMW-like driving position accentuates the driver-focused feel. It’s a hoot, yet seems more planted than the sometimes fidgety outgoing model, mostly due to the generous track widths.

The manual box is worth a special mention, too. The new gearlever is less oversized and more tactile than the old item, plus the shift action itself is terrific. Switch from fuel-saving Green or Normal mode into Sport – via a curious rotating ring control which encircles the gearlever – and the engine blips when downchanging, making even the most ham-fisted driver feel (and sound) like a heel-and-toe hero.

Underlining the new Cooper’s more sophisticated personality is the option of adaptive dampers – a first for this class. The £375 Variable Damper Control system is worth adding if you intend to spec larger alloy wheels like those on our car. The 17-inch rims work wonders with the new Mini’s chunky looks, but they do tend to crash over potholes. Selecting the comfort-orientated ride setting can take the edge off, but it’s still far from supple. It’s worth sampling the more stylish wheels before buying, especially if your Cooper will spend its time on scarred city streets.

MINI Cooper 2014 UK interior

The extra-cost suspension was the tip of an options iceberg for our test car, which boasted goodies including the Chili and Media packs, LED front lights, a head-up display, glass sunroof and heated seats. In total, the toys pushed our Cooper’s price from a reasonable £15,300 (just £400 up on the old model) to an eye-watering £24,830.

We suspect that a lighter hand with the options list would result in a Mini that’s just as satisfying to drive, and more economical. Added options are, after all, notoriously difficult to recoup value from when it comes to reselling.

Disqus - noscript

I think it looks uglier than the previous models. The DS3 is prettier.

Pretty sure I'd buy one except my local BMW/MINI dealer is a complete **** and I don't feel like driving 60 miles one way to the next closest dealer - a family owned main dealer that has a GREAT reputation

From the front it looks like an ugly fish. However, I have no doubt that this will be a great driver's car. Previous minis were badly let down by their engines but were still the most fun FWD cars being made. Only the Fiesta came close.

I'm sorry folks but the current model is better looking car on the outside. Inside seems to be a different story though, looks to be a bit more quality on this new one.
Shame about the looks.

I like it very much, the pastiche design is far more up to date, the old fogeys won't like it of course, but not all cars need to be stuck in the past to please them. Anyway, who would want a car that negative old curmudgeons like?

I am trying to get mini dealer to quote me a 2 year PCP deal but they don't seem to have the pricing available. Probably better to wait 12 months and get a nearly new anyway.

Who wants a 3 pot engine when a 4 pot is superior and the fuel saving is not 25% reduction whilst the number of cylinders is !!!!!!

The trouble is that, judging from the pictures, stuck in the past is just what this is, with some rather questionable detailing. It is actually spot on for the old fogeys.
However original thought from BMW produces real stylistic horrors at present like the Paceman and the i3. Perhaps this is the better course after all.

Im sure I speak for most people who use this site. We are not interested in how good a car is to drive, we are only interested in how reliable a car is or how good it looks (but not both)!

I dont need another car at this point but this article has angered me to the extent that I'm now off to order a DS3! Yes it may handle like a bucket of sand but at least its not german! Grrrr!

Well at least you started your comment with an apology for the rest of it.

Disagree, it has contemporary styling cues and is in line with up to date ideas. This styling will really upset the fogeys.

It's 2014. Try and keep up.

After ordering a brochure from a Mini dealer, i was telephoned several times, written to several times, and emailed several times, all virtually assuming i was buying one, and that they had exactly what i wanted in stock etc etc blah blah. i ordered a brochure and got the hard sell, despite ticking the do not email and do not telephone options. I didn't want to buy one of the monstrosities in the first place, just take a closer look at specs etc, but my god, the hassle of getting the hard-selling pushy dealers off your back is apalling!

At least owners of the current model won't feel pushed into 'upgrading' by this. I know you can't change the design too much as it's so popular but I feel they could have been a bit more adventurous. As others have mentioned, the exterior looks could even be called a 'downgrade'. Also, I've never driven a pleasurable 3CYL engine, though I suppose if anyone can do it BMW can.

You speak for yourself, this is AutoExpress, you cannot take any car review on this site seriously, the only reason to come to this site is for a laugh. This is where the journos deliberately mess with the star ratings so they can have a laugh the anally retentive people commenting and getting upset as if it even matters.

It's 2014, generally there are no affordable cars that as a general case be classed as unreliable. The more advanced cars with leading edge engineering - the more expensive cars - are the ones that are more likely to need the dealer. But no specific model in general. Even the surveys are non-objective and there isn't a big gap between them.

And if you want to know how good a car looks then use your eyes. I saw loads of cars on the motorway today. Some were really nice.

It's subjective, but the whole car looks like a huge improvement in all respects.
The car has more interior space and uprated safety engineering. The 3 cylinder engine is lighter and more powerful than the one it replaces and manages to improve mpg and reduce emissions.

Car makers are adopting less cylinders and more power from less CC despite them being more expensive to make because they are competing with each other. More and more will appear.

I am still waiting for them to bring back the Maxi

Triumph can do it. Until recently I had a Sprint ST and it had a wonderful 3 cylinder engine...

Why would anyone produce "retro" otherwise than to appeal to the old fogeys. It's the automotive equivalent of Mock Tudor.

3 pot engines are actually very good even when they are not turbo charged, they generally have more low/mid range torque than 4 pots, they sound better than your everyday 4 pot engine, they are lighter, cheaper to service and take up less room in the engine bay. They do have alot going for them really. P.s I've got a little 3 pot in my aygo and it is actually is a surprisingly peppy engine.

I guess by 'old fogey' you mean in attitude rather than years.

Personally, I think this Mini iteration looks fussy (aka 'old-fashioned') with driver ergonomics that seem little or no better than previous models.

As for the ring of '17 LEDs', they may look cute, but do they add to the driver experience? Only a test drive will reveal!

In a simplistic world. Have you considered the Fiat 500?
The VW Beetle? The new Mini? Fogeys don't like them because they don't like change and they think only the originals will do. A bit like the negative cup-half-empty merchants you see in AutoExpress comments. They will never be happy because they are naturally miserable. Their comments are always negative. Don't bother trying to convince them, leave them to the flock wallpaper and flowery carpets.

Spot on! And the fuel saving may not be 25% over the previous 4Cyl, but the 3Cyl gives a power increase as well as a fuel saving in a lighter unit. Winners all ways.

BIG improvement... good job BMW!

My problem with the vehicle is not that it is a change from the original but that it is not different enough! I seriously doubt the ability of BMW to produce anything original that is not gopping ugly.
As for the FIAT 500 it is not for me but at least it is a reasonably decent pastiche of its forebear. The MINI is a seriously bad pastiche.

Except for the size from the outside this looks more like the original mini than any of the previous retros. But the interior is terrible and I thought those rear seat head rests were boom boxes!!!!

With the more larger Mini, I am surprised they can call it that. To my mind, this HAS become a Maxi!

Mini pastiche: Subjective opinion. Irrelevant.

162Ib ft at 1250RPM!
It is a terrifically responsive engine, offering lively pull from little more than 1000rpm all the way to its 6400rpm cut-out. There is a fleeting moment of lag just above idle, but the flexibility and vivacity that follows makes the peaky nature of the four-cylinder engine it replaces seem incredibly old fashioned. The new engine is also delightfully entertaining and boasts a quite extraordinary operating range, giving the Cooper solid acceleration allied to a wonderfully relaxed nature when pulling taller gears. - Autocar.

Of course my view is subjective; just like yours. Recent BMW designs, such as the Pacemaker, have a knack of looking even worse in reality than in pictures.

The new interior is a peach and the cabin is roomy and since it's a Mini it will handle like a dream.
The various comments about its looks don't surprise me. Mini is marmite. Either you like it or hate.
The only car Mini can be compared with in terms of retro looks is Volkswagen's Beetle. But that doesn't handle quarter as well as Mini and doesn't have such wonderful engines.

^ Typo. The new MINI is 44mm wider, not 44m wider.

I rather like the exterior changes, overall. The details are less fussy, though still overdone. The face - primarily because of the animated headlights - looks more buggish (like in insects) than it could have: fun to look at for a few moments, then tiring and goofy. At least the overall feeling is more cohesive than before.

The interior is, simply, still overwrought. What probably looked great in renderings and clay looks toyish in final form. The ergos don't seem to have improved enough, either. Don't think I could live with that every day. The interior is one of the most direct and palpable parts of the owner experience.

The mechanicals, though, are a different and welcome story. The move to a three is smart. And, like Ford's, this one seems to hit the mark. There is nothing wrong with better mpg, more power and less weight! And the soundtrack is said to be better. Looking forward to hearing it. With a better chassis and a bit more elbow room, this looks like a no-excuses driver.

But there are many rather brilliant rides in this category. And most are, ultimately, more reliable, offsetting some of the loss in value one might see in some of the other marques. I'd rather spend less time cuddling up with my service manager than getting back another few quid in 4-5 years. Particularly if I've spent, quite probably, much more on post-warranty repairs.

Great car, though, for many people. Yet another reason to rejoice in our good fortune of living in the golden age of automobiles. So many wonderful choices...

Maxi - yes please and the Princess

I know cars have to evolve, but BMW seems intent on making the Mini the most fugly car on the market.
Sticking with my 12 year old R53.

Still a reverse tardis for young chinese.

I'll reserve judgement on the looks until I've seen one in the metal: Some pics make the front end look very bulbous, in others it looks fine. I really think they've made the interior too complicated and intricate, though. They could have stripped it back and made it more simple, but not by just putting everything on a touchscreen.

Looks like it's vomiting. People will definitely laugh at you, but when they hear how much you paid for it they'll just shake their heads in shocked disbelief. Starting price should be £8500 to fit with it's competitors, not.... wait for it £15,000!! Gasp!! Ridiculously overpriced.

With regard to your last paragraph, you couldn't be further from the truth. For so many reasons, it's one of the worse times for cars. The car industry has become more & more boring as each year progresses. The golden age(s) are now long gone. Not only that, but with regard to choice, so many cars are virtually the same these days (there's no difference between a 3 series and a Mondeo), the only difference being the badge. The models & manufacturers have all morphed into one mainly coughing out diesel 4 door saloons & 4x4s which crowd our roads. Some manufacturers over style in a desperate attempt to try to make their cars stand out from the crowd, often making them look ugly. Years ago, at motor shows (and before political correctness put an end to sexy girls draping themselves over the bonnets!), people were genuinely excited - today, people wonder around aimlessly between showrooms, more concerned with arguing about "perceived image" whilst all the time knowing that the cars from different manufacturers are in fact pretty much the same. So what if cars are stuffed with more complex technology, it doesn't necessarily make cars more desirable or enjoyable - in fact it invariably has the opposite effect. Years ago, when Aston Martin brought out a new car, it was fantastic, but now, who cares if we have yet another iteration of the what essentially looks like the the same car. Years ago, Jaguars were really special - but today it's just not the same - the X type was a disaster for the marque. Gtis in the days of the 205Gti were absolutely fantastic. Ok, these days they're faster, but nothing like as fun. Names like Cosworth, RS, and Rally really meant something when placed on the back of a car - these days nearly everything ends (and rattles) in a D for "diesel". So many different, interesting and exciting marques have died, and today our choice, particularly for sports cars is comparatively extremely limited. There are a few exciting/interesting cars today, but compared to previous decades I'm afraid you're living in the boring age of the automobile and I fear that with regulation it will only get worse. So what is better?... well robots build them better these days, they're more reliable and you have a few gizmos like SatNav, but that's it. Hardly the "golden age of motoring"!!

To each their own, of course. But, having actually owned and lived with over 60 cars from sixties on, I'd say we've come a long way.

I don't get out smelling of gas. I don't break down. I don't have to fiddle under the hood or the body every weekend, whether I wanted to, or not. Handling - with the right car - is much better, particularly factoring in ride. I'm not concerned as much about getting crushed in an accident. I get *much* better overall performance: Even today's "warm" hatches are speedier, handle and brake better, are more efficient, are much cleaner (!) and are far more reliable than *any* of the much vaunted classics. A tough combination to ignore.

Each period has a "look" and follows a form factor that developed as acceptable for the time. Take a typical car profile from just about any era and without the visual details, they are difficult to tell apart (with notable exceptions, of course!). I rather like the latest complex lines and compound curves that were only accessible in the past (having been largely hand-made), to the rich. Headlights and taillights are becoming much more artful. And interiors - except for all those 4-wheeled appliances (which serve great purpose) - are more comfortable and durable.

Yep, I'll take the modern experience, except like you, without the gonzo electronics. Stop, please! And I fondly remember my Datsun Zs, Fiats, a V6 Capri, a 914, sixties Mustangs, etc. But if start to think about what the ownership experience was actually like - smells, bad noises, stuff falling off, rust, major damage from minor accidents, etc. - I'm no longer nostalgic. Having one around for a weekend ride is as good as it gets.

New Mini Cooper 2014 The climate control is not standard its an option. The manual aircon needs to be ordered at 0£ as well. The car does have plastic steering wheel no buttons on it and the alloys are 15 inch with 175 tyres even LED day running light are 670£.a bit funny the manufacturer is expecting the cm to upgrade for a loot of money,
be careful when ticking boxes on the options list, because extras aren’t cheap.

i had the test drive and you will not notice its 3 cilinder its as quick as the fiat 500 Abarth
and realy fun to drive

Looks fantastic on the road, photos don't do it justice! It's also great value for money for a mild hot hatch!

Great value for money, as tested this cost nearly £25k, a fully loaded 182bhp Fiesta ST-3 is £19k, a 250bhp Focus ST-2 is £23.5k, so please explain how this is good value for money..

They may take up less room in your engine bay, but so what, what are you going to do with all this extra room, cook a Sunday roast, the engine bay was designed to take a larger 4 pot engine, and therefore the space that is being saved by fitting a 3 pot is just going to waste..

At £15k this car has everything you need. If anything, the ride will be more comfortable with the standard alloys. The car still looks good inside and out. You can buy the Fiesta ST3 for £19k but it still doesn't include satnav, met paint, climate control, cruise control (according to WhatCar). If you did splash out for the satnav/infotainment systems for either car, the ford version would look hopelessly clunky and old fashioned compared to the Mini's.

Yes you can buy a bigger, more powerful car, but it would still cost you a lot more! And when you get your bigger, more powerful car you can still spend thousands more on extras.

At the end of the day, for £15k you can't get a better combination of fun, comfort and performance, especially considering its low running costs!

Look good to me! In comparison the DS3 looks to have aged badly already!

A very subjective view. My own subjective view is that this "new" Mini is born old fashioned and represents a woefully missed opportunity to improve the packaging. In general, yet again subjectively, BMW/MINI seems to display some of the least accomplished styling of any of the major manufacturers.

£8,500 for a car that can do 0-62 in just under 8 seconds along with excellent claimed economy figures?

Sorry carGeek, I've amended what you'd have just received on e-mail, as I looked at the One.... I didn't check the Cooper.... £15,300 otr, and 0-62 7.9, but I still think it's too much money for the metal. mpg combined = 62.8, and yes, I still think around £9k (definitely sub £10k) is what it should be priced at.. certainly for the One.

I reckon £12k would be reasonable enough for the One because 10 seconds 0-62 is still pretty fast for a supermini.

You may be right, if I'm honest I exaggerated the point as at the end of the day I was trying to stress just how over priced the Mini is.. PS sorry for my inconsistency, a few glasses of wine tonight, and passing the computer whilst sorting dinner and watching a film. I should add that we'll probably have a mini convertible soon ourselves, as the wife wants one!

Hahaha, that made me laugh. No worries mate... I wish it was £9k though. Would be top of my Christmas list. Hope your wife enjoys her Convertible.

If you are talking about BMW SUVs I would agree but I think the saloons look good and the 6 series looks exceptional. The first BMW mini hatchback was spot on, but the mk2 and all the variants looked a bit odd. This mk 3 looks like a hit to me. The best looking retro IMO is the Fiat 500 because it has very minimal, conservative styling. The Citroen is a styling disaster though. It's an abstract mishmash of bits of bling and accessories. Just looks chaotic to me. To Citroen's credit, I'm glad they didn't go retro. Can you imagine how ugly a new 2CV would be?!

Agree with your thoughts about the 500 but with the 500l FIAT seem to have been taking ugliness lessons from BMW. The I3 vies with the Juke (pace Nissanolics), Paceman and Countryman as about the ugliest thing on wheels. We will just have to disagree about the DS3

The fiesta st3 comes with all of those things as standard and their systems, done by Microsoft, are very good. Also much easier to haggle a good deal on a ford.

Key specs

  • Price: £15,300
  • Engine: 1.5-litre three-cyl turbo
  • Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
  • Power: 135bhp
  • 0-62mph/top speed: 7.9 seconds/130mph
  • Economy/CO2: 61.4mpg/107g/km
  • On sale: Now
AEX 1,339
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express - available as a weekly magazine and on your iPad. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!

Sponsored Links