Toyota Auris Hybrid vs Rivals

6 Nov, 2013 9:45am

New Golf BlueMotion is Volkswagen's most economical family hatch yet. We pitch it against eco models from BMW and Toyota

Car makers are under increasing pressure to cut the overall emissions of their ranges, and are introducing cleaner, more efficient cars that push tech to the limit.

Volkswagen’s BlueMotion models are leading the way, and the company has just launched its latest Golf BlueMotion. Like its predecessor, it gets a 1.6-litre diesel that’s tuned for efficiency, plus it now comes with a six-speed gearbox, rather than the old car’s five-speeder.

Toyota Auris Hybrid review

Volkswagen Golf BlueMotion review

BMW 116d EfficientDynamics

For its first test, we’ve lined up two cars that will fully challenge its eco credentials. The BMW 116d EfficientDynamics follows the same philosophy as the Golf, by maximising the efficiency of its 1.6-litre diesel. It also adds fun rear-wheel-drive handling to the mix.

Then there’s the Toyota Auris Hybrid. This hatch uses a petrol-electric drivetrain to achieve low running costs, and it’s reasonably well equipped, too. Fuel economy was key to this test, so we hit the town and motorway to find out which car is easiest on your wallet.

Fuel range

Our test revealed that the Golf BlueMotion is best for long-distance driving, thanks to economy of 57.6mpg. The 50-litre fuel tank is two litres smaller than the BMW’s, but the Golf can go 634 miles between fills, compared to 596 miles for the 116d. The Auris lags behind due to a smaller 45-litre tank, although city driving will extend its range with electric running. It’s also £10 cheaper to fill than the Golf, partly thanks to the lower cost of petrol.

Warranties

The Volkswagen and BMW get three-year warranties, but the Auris steals a march thanks to its generous five-year coverage. What’s more, Toyota is so confident of the hybrid drivetrain’s reliability and longevity that it’s covered for eight years.

Eco displays

All three cars have displays to show you how much power you’re using. The Toyota ditches the rev counter in favour of an energy dial, which swings between Charge, Eco and Power modes, while a read-out shows energy flow between engine, battery and wheels. The BMW features a needle set into the rev counter, although charging mode just tops up the 12V battery. On the Golf, you get a display that shows which systems, such as the air-con or heated mirrors, are using up energy.

1st place - Volkswagen Golf

While the Polo BlueMotion set the template for VW’s range of efficient models, its eco-friendly approach was also translated to the Golf MkV and MkVI. The latest MkVII model has taken the philosophy of the original car and developed it further, with the introduction of a revised 1.6 TDI diesel and the inclusion of a six-speed gearbox for the first time. The car in our pictures is a three-door, but in the interests of fairness, we tested the five-door version. The Golf BlueMotion eliminates all the compromises of the last model to deliver a great all-round performance. The diesel is smooth, the six-speed gearbox is great and it handles well. Brilliant, provided you cover enough miles to justify the £1,215 premium over the Golf 1.6 TDI 105 S.

2nd place - BMW 116d

These days, BMW is as well known for its low-emissions EfficientDynamics technology as it is for building sporty models. The smallest ED-badged car is the 116d. It’s the same price as the standard 116d ES, but while that model gets a 2.0-litre diesel, the ED version uses a smaller 1.6 and additional fuel saving technology. As with the Golf, the car in our pictures is a three-door, but we have tested the five-door version. It's a close-run thing between the VW and BMW. As long as you don’t mind its looks, you won’t feel short-changed by plumping for the 1 Series. It’s involving to drive, surprisingly comfortable, and is only knocked into second place by its higher price and slightly poorer economy figures.

3rd place - Toyota Auris

The Auris Hybrid is the flagship of Toyota’s hatchback range. A diesel Auris is available, but this has a 1.4 engine that lags behind the VW’s and BMW’s for emissions and performance. The Hybrid version uses the Hybrid Synergy Drive (HSD) set-up from the Prius, featuring a 1.8-litre petrol engine, 650v electric motor and nickel metal-hydride batteries. We test the £20,395 Icon, but the car pictured is the flagship £22,145 Excel model. The Auris is perfect for urban drivers who don’t want the range anxiety of an electric car, but can’t afford a plug-in hybrid. But that’s the only reason you’d buy one, as it’s not as good to drive as its rivals, is uncomfortable and has a poorer cabin finish. It makes sense as a cheap company car, though.

Volkswagen Golf BlueMotion 5dr BMW 116d ED 5dr Toyota Auris 1.8 Hybrid Icon
On the road price/total as tested £20,990/£21,305 £21,095/£24,495 £20,395/£23,045
Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000) £9,886/47.1% £10,484/49.6% £7,628/37.4%
Depreciation £11,104 £10,611 £12,767
Annual tax liability std/higher rate £544/£1,089 £589/£1,178 £407/£814
Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles) £1,316/£2,194 £1,455/£2,426 £1,608/£2,680
Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost 15/£319/A/£0 15/£329/A/£0 7/£266/A/£0
Cost of 1st/2nd/3rd service £359 (3yrs/30k) £375 (5yrs/50k) £139/£209/£139
Length/wheelbase 4,255/2,637mm 4,324/2,690mm 4,275/2,600mm
Height/width 1,452/1,799mm 1,421/1,765mm 1,460/1,760mm
Engine 4cyl in-line/1,598cc 4cyl in-line/1,598cc 4cyl in-line/1,798cc
Peak power/revs 109/3,200 bhp/rpm 114/4,000 bhp/rpm 136**/5,200 bhp/rpm
Peak torque/revs 250/1,500 Nm/rpm 260/1,750 Nm/rpm 142/4,000 Nm/rpm
Transmission 6-spd man/fwd 6-spd man/rwd CVT/fwd
Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel 50 litres/repair kit 52 litres/repair kit 45 litres/repair kit
Boot capacity (seats up/down) 380/1,270 litres 360/1,200 litres 360/1,200 litres
Kerbweight/payload/towing weight 1,280/535/1,000kg 1,395/530kg/N/A 1,420/395kg/N/A
Turning circle/drag coefficient 10.9 metres/0.27Cd 10.9 metres/0.30Cd 10.4 metres/N/A
Basic warranty (miles)/recovery 3yrs (60,000)/1yr VW 3yrs (unltd)/3yrs 5yrs (100,000)/1yr AA
Service intervals/UK dealers Variable/223 Variable/153 10,000 miles (1yr)/181
Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos. 16th/25th 15th/24th 9th/3rd
Euro NCAP: Adult/child/ped./stars 94/89/65/5 91/83/63/5 92/84/68/5
0-60/30-70mph 9.2/8.9 secs 9.6/9.4 secs 10.2/9.9 secs
30-50mph in 3rd/4th 4.4/6.5 secs 4.6/7.0 secs 3.9 secs (kickdown)
50-70mph in 5th/6th 8.1/11.7 secs 9.2/12.7 secs 6.0 secs (kickdown)
Top speed/rpm at 70mph 124mph/1,800rpm 121mph/1,800rpm 112mph/N/A
Braking 70-0/60-0/30-0mph 51.0/37.1/9.7m 48.3/35.0/8.9m 47.2/34.1/8.6m
Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range 57.6/12.7/634 miles 52.1/11.5/596 miles 44.9/9.9/444 miles
Noise outside/idle/30/70mph 61/47/62/67dB 64/48/62/70dB 59/47/60/69dB
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined 74.3/94.2/88.3mpg 62.4/83.1/74.3mpg 78.5/80.7/78.5mpg
Govt urban/extra-urban/combined 16.3/20.7/19.4mpl 13.7/18.3/16.3mpl 17.3/17.8/17.3mpl
Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket 131/85g/km/13% 145/99g/km/14% 145/84g/km/10%
Airbags/Isofix/parking sensors/cam Seven/y/£450/£165 Six/y/£595/£330 Seven/yes/£350*/yes
Auto/tyre monitor/stability/cruise ctrl No/yes/yes/£240 No/yes/yes/£525 Yes/no/yes/no
Climate control/leather/heated seats No/no/£375 £675*/£1,150/£295 Yes/no/no
Metallic paint/xenons/keyless go £525/no/no £550/£590/£350 £495*/no/£550*
Sat-nav/USB/DAB radio/Bluetooth No/yes/yes/yes £990*/yes/yes/yes £650/yes/yes/yes

Disqus - noscript

For everyone with common sense, choose the Auris, better build quality, far more kit and better to look at, not to mention the no 1 in reliability. If you want prove, test drive both cars (VW and Auris). You will be disappointed in de VW and surprised by the Toyota. Despite all the efforts of the sponsored motorpress to be negative about the Auris, this car is doing (very) well in Europe (even in Germany!) and the Golf VII is way behind the expectations (especially in Germany). Not to mention the serious quality issues (rust and leakage) with the brandnew Golf VII (see several articles published in Autobild the German counterpart of AE-magazine).

Before I even opened the "review" I was 100% correct with the "verdict" places.

this is not a fare review.....they never mention the european cars cost higher in road tax...maintanance.....

Rather the Auris for its appel and reliability, then the BMW for its engine capacity and the Golf that comes last because is not for me.

Agree 100% with you! VW only have image, nothing else!!

This magazine is too much VW tendency!!

Interesting to hear about quality issues with Golf VII. Strange how the motoring press in this country never pick up on that yet are quick of their mark on recall stories with the likes of Toyota - even when they do not relate to cars sold in the UK!
I have never owned a Toyota yet the Auris, to me, looks like a smart, under rated mid size product.

What does that say then about the UK car buying public's taste ( or lack of).

Unfortunately!!!

The problem with the Auris is that the petrol electric hybrid system is flawed. The cost of the technology means they cut corners elsewhere compared to the competition such as the quality of finish. The added weight of batteries and motors also has a negative impact on the way it drives. It is also less efficient than its diesel rivals in real life as proven by the significant difference in mpg on this test.

Judging by the comment from 'Albert Netherlands' it sounds like VW are cutting a few corners with regards to quality on the new Golf.

In my opinion:
1st: 116d ED
2st: Auris
3st: -----
Golf is not my favourite, I dont like it.

A totally biased report. I have just purchased the Auris XL. The quality of the fit and finish matches anything that the Germans do. I have spent the last 20 years driving their cars so I should know. The driver's seat is the most comfortable yet. The fuel consumption is 53 m.p.g. based on the first tankful.I expect that to improve with time. It must have been up a mountain to get as low as 44.9 m.p.g. Your own in gear acceleration figures show that it outguns the German cars. There are no d.p.f. problems to worry about. Keeping the filter clear reduces the value of having a diesel. I find the BMW so cramped in the back I can hardly get into it.
What's not to like about a British built car that will never go wrong and last forever ?

I have owned the new Auris hybrid since sept 2013. I travel +500 miles a week. I am getting 64 mpg each week without trying, this actually recording the miles done against the fuel used and not off the computer which reads closer to 70+ mpg. I think it very well built. Runs like a dream. Cost 8p a litre less to fill up. Only down fall is the cvt transmission, it's so easy to use but terrible noise at high revs.
I previous owned a Skoda with the new vw 1.6 tdi cr engine we also own a Golf 1.6d cr blue motion and I think both cars are very good. They both give me around 60mpg on my weekly travels. The only problem with them both is the constant d.p.f. requiring cleaning, (even on 25k of motorway driving). I also a had few engine management issues after been stuck In traffic and also a few build quality issues.
I think although vw engines are very good while running on long journeys most of my problem after sitting in the endless Friday evening traffic jams on the M6. I would rate toyota auris 5 * and golf 4*

This review is absolute rubbish. I have an Auris Hybrid and it delivers a regular 53-55mpg - this on a petrol engine! Road tax is zero and insurance cheaper than both the VW and BMW. VWs are overpriced and BMWs only for posers.

The only flaw is that Toyota didn't use a lithium battery, but that would have pushed the price up. In 3-4 years there will be a new Auris Hybrid with a much better battery. The concept is not flawed at all - it's a question of cost.

Auto Express 1,342
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express - available as a weekly magazine and on your iPad. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!

Sponsored Links