Audi A1 quattro vs Audi Ur-Quattro

4 Feb, 2013 10:30am

Technology meets tradition as the all-new Audi A1 quattro takes on the original four-wheel-drive Audi Ur-Quattro

Hot hatches are as popular as they’ve ever been these days, but the new Audi A1 quattro is no ordinary souped-up supermini.

It’s limited to just 333 left-hand-drive cars, only available in white and features the aggressive styling usually reserved for Audi’s storming RS range. It also has running gear from the larger S3, giving it a combination of four-wheel drive and 253bhp turbo power that’s unique in this class.

So rather than pitch the A1 against slower rivals, we’re comparing it with a famous ancestor. The Quattro took Audi into motorsport in the eighties and paved the way for its modern success. And while these cars are separated by 23 years, both are hand-built, use turbo engines to power all four wheels and claim 0-62mph in under six seconds.

Today, the original Quattro is commonly known as the Ur-Quattro, and the 1989 example in this test is one of the last off the line. It gets a 217bhp five-cylinder engine, and it stands a good chance of teaching the newcomer a lesson. If the A1 can capture even a small slice of the magic that made the original car so special, it’ll go some way to justifying its £40,000-plus asking price.

Verdict

Audi has made huge profits selling premium saloons in recent years, but its heart and soul still belong to high-performance four-wheel-drive sports cars like the A1 quattro and Ur-Quattro.

While the brand has drifted away from its rallying roots – towards Le Mans 24 Hours glory – its high-performance road cars retain the same heady mix of powerful engines and four-wheel-drive traction.

We’re not picking a winner in this test, but both cars are clearly very special. And while we’d hoped the A1 would be a little quicker than its ancestor after 23 years’ development, there’s no faulting its high-revving performance or the quality finish and luxurious equipment inside.

The decision to fit so many new mechanical parts but leave the steering untouched might just come back to haunt Audi: a lack of responsiveness from the electric rack is the A1’s only real weak point.

Without this fault, it would be an instant classic, and in the long term its rarity should take the sting out of its depreciation and eye-watering price.

As for the Ur-Quattro, its status as an icon is clearly deserved, as few classics could give their modern rivals a run for their money. Driving the two side-by-side was a fantastic glimpse of Audi’s DNA, and we hope future limited-edition models continue to use the great Quattro as a blueprint.

Disqus - noscript

£40k for a Polo, no thank you..

Like...but only for the URQ pics...the A1 is just silly here...

Gosh, the A1 looks a blobby lump of lard, compared to the lean and rakish Quattro.

However, I recall the so-called sunroof on my Q, which opened only a couple of fingers' width.

According to the Audi salesman, "Because of the roll cage in the way"!

Auto Express 1,342
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express - available as a weekly magazine and on your iPad. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!

Sponsored Links