The hottest-ever edition of the popular Skoda Fabia hatch has arrived. With an aggressive look plus a new turbocharged and supercharged engine, the vRS sounds great on paper – but how good is it on the road?
See the Polo GTI take on the SEAT Ibiza Cupra and Skoda Fabia vRS here:
The model we drove was finished in Fabia S2000 rally car-inspired Rallye Green – a new addition to the options list and one which certainly leaves quite a first impression. On top of this, the hot hatch gets a long list of styling modifications.
There are four sets of 17-inch Gigaro alloys to choose from, a larger sports grille, tinted glass, a rear spoiler and flared arches. The flagship Fabia also gets LED running lights, a rear diffuser and chrome-finished double exhaust pipes. Its suspension has been tuned as well, with springs that lower the car by 15mm.
Inside, the cabin feels very well built, if not exactly exciting. There are comfortable, figure-hugging sports seats featuring the vRS logo, a three-spoke leather steering wheel and sports-style pedals. But these are the extent of the major changes.
Popular
Under the bonnet, the 1.9-litre TDI diesel which proved so popular in the first vRS has been replaced by the twin-charged TSI petrol 1.4. This also features in VW’s new Polo GTI and the SEAT Ibiza Cupra. As with those models, a seven-speed DSG box is the only transmission option available.
This combination results in very good performance figures, with the Fabia vRS covering 0-62mph in 7.3 seconds. It is cheap to run, too, with CO2 emissions rated at 148g/km and combined economy of 45.6mpg.
Yet despite the impressive specs, the replacement engine doesn’t have the personality of its oil-burning predecessor. The DSG box’s short ratios mean the unit revs quickly and freely, and there is plenty of pace at all times, but as it approaches the top of the range it makes a lot of noise and can become tiresome at high speeds.
The box also kicks down a bit too readily, which can make for a frustrating driving experience, especially on winding roads. Using the tidy, steering wheel-mounted paddleshifters makes the car far more engaging and enjoyable to drive.
Through corners the Fabia offers plenty of grip, the steering is accurate, if rather numb, and there is virtually no body roll. The combination of its sorted suspension, lower ride height and clever new XDS electronically controlled slip differential means the Skoda is easier to drive fast than the previous vRS, too.
Despite all the sports tuning, the ride is good, and the Fabia promises to be easy to live with day-to-day. Low running costs will make it a good city car as well.
And that’s before you consider what excellent value for money the newcomer represents. At £15,700, it undercuts the Ibiza Cupra by £295 and is likely to cost a staggering £2,300 less than the latest hot Polo.
We wish there was a diesel, and the limited driver involvement lets the car down. The uninspiring cabin doesn’t help, either. But with its all-round performance, practicality and great price, the Fabia is an appealing package.
Rival: R’sport Clio 200 Cup
Entry-level Cup version of the Renaultsport Clio weighs in at only £15,750. It’s stripped out and not the easiest car to live with, but is arguably the most thrilling hot hatch in its class – and is difficult to beat.
For an alternative review of the latest Skoda Fabia visit our sister site carbuyer.co.uk
For more breaking car news and reviews, subscribe to Auto Express magazine. We'll give you 6 issues for £1 and a free gift!
It would be good to have the comments transposed from the previous article,as you get a real flavour of the vRS 'UNHAPPY' Owners, at Skoda's lack of involvement with their customer on the replacements spec.i.e. no hot diesel mated to 6 speed box,for real uniqueness and driver appeal of the mark! Get the 170bhp Golf Gtd motor in it Skoda and start talking to your customer.Don't just follow the VW clones.
Cheers, Keith
PS.Just done 300 mile round trip ,mainly on motorway,quickly and still returned 71.5 mpg.Beat that petrol!!
I agree entirely with keithmorris6's comments - except, of course, his achievement on his 300 mile trip which I haven't matched personally.
Thanks for agreement.
Regarding my fuel consumption, on a very recent trip.
Car recently serviced prior to this journey (30,000) ,two people and an average speed of just over 60mpg.Could not believe return.I've checked my computer readouts for accuracy previously and it's pretty good,so no major exaggeration here.
This my 2nd vRS and I love my current SE version to bits.Would just like Skoda to recognise, that Owners have a view going forward.Not everyone wants a high reving all bells and whistles, latest techno, clone car.K.I.S.SKODA. !!!
Cheers,Keith.
Sadly, VAG seem to have completely missed the reason the original vRS was such a massive winner for them - it was cheap, felt quick and it was extraordinarily cheap to run - cheap insurance, low price servicing and phenomenal fuel economy. The new car is £4500 more expensive, slightly slower in many ways and less fuel efficient. A remapped Mk1 vRS offers far more oomph for half the money. And even dressed up the Mk2 still looks like it's Noddy's daily driver!
Sorry Skoda UK, but you won't be getting my money this time around.
Had lots of Fabias. Tried the VRS this time. Yes, it's fast. Very. That said it's a little basic in other areas. Like the DSG auto box. Full auto useful but hesitates when pulling away from junctions. So not as precise as I'd like. Semi-auto is possible via paddles but can't always find the paddles when turning the wheel because of their position.
Lots of niggling features which detract from a highly priced Fabia. No front fogs. They're daylight running lights now. No rear interior lighting. Petrol is 98 octane. Not 95. So expensive to run. Fuel economy? Too soon yet to be sure but I'm guessing around 30-35mpg.
So, it is fun to drive but if you like lots of bells and whistles then I guess you'd need to look elsewhere. OK, my Fabia 3 105 bhp is not as powerful as the vrs, but it has a more engaging manual box and has got plenty of bells and whistles for a cost less than the vrs and still does 0 to 60 in just under 10 secs.
If the VRS had a manual box, and just a few more refinements it'd be a lot more satisfying.
But, you pays your money and . . . . . .
The DSG box is like no other box around, despite efforts by other, German and French mainly, manufacturers to fool us into thinking otherwise. Like anything new and different it takes time to learn how to make the most of it. After about 30 minutes in the local dealer's mule I was just starting to play the box through the accelerator pedal, and just starting to find the car amusing and efficient. I look forward to more and better of the same. Six weeks to D, for delivery, day!
At least I didn't buy an anaemic, pungent and under-powered oil-burner! Not for me the jealous attempts to convince myself that I really wanted only half the horses anyway. (This where I have to duck and wait for the rotting greengrocery to stop flying my way...)
the standard mk1 vRS with 130hp is quicker than this mk2 version from stand still FACT as i tanked one in a race ~(on private land) then we got a mapped version of the mk1 runnnig at 184hp and i dont think i need to tell you what happened apart from it hit 60mph in 6seconds! 4 year old vRS SE £7500 and a remapp 300 quid whereas a new vRS sets you back 14k? get that 170 tdi in it SKoda!
The new Fabia vRS is a class act, with the aggressive styling upgrades making it easy to set apart from lesser versions of the supermini. Yet although it looks slick and feels as well built as any Skoda, it’s short on flair. The sole engine, a 1.4-litre TSI, is smooth and revs freely, but above 5,000rpm it begins to sound strained. The fact the firm no longer offers a diesel option is another disappointment. Running costs will be low, though, and when you factor in the bargain starting price, Skoda should have no trouble selling plenty of these sporty little hatches.