UK speed humps: should they stay or should they go?

Plans to remove speed humps from UK roads have been labelled as "daft and irresponsible" by road safety campaigners

Skoda Yeti rear tracking

Government plans to remove speed humps in order to improve air quality have been attacked by road safety campaigners. 

Last month's air quality plan highlighted the need for councils to reduce congestion in urban areas to help cut back pollution levels and the suggestions put forward by the Government include removing speed humps in congested areas so traffic flow could be improved. The thinking is that speed bumps cause drivers to repeatedly accelerate and brake, leading to higher emissions levels in the urban areas where they tend to be used. 

But these plans have been labelled as “daft and irresponsible” by road safety campaigners who believe they will lead to more accidents. To find out whether speed humps should be removed from our roads or not, Auto Express has assembled the key arguments from the pro and anti speed hump camps.  

Why we should keep speed humps

Speed humps are critical to road safety as they prevent drivers from speeding, especially in built up areas and school zones. That's the crux of the argument set out by the pro-speed hump lobby and it was clearly in line with Government thinking until recently speed humps were allowed to proliferate on our streets. 

Living Streets, a children’s safety campaign has labelled the plans to get rid of speed bumps as “daft and irresponsible”. Speaking to the BBC, it said it was worried that if councils removed speed humps without installing other measures to slow down drivers, children would be at a greater risk when walking to school.

It pointed out that this increase in risk could cause more parents to opt to drive their kids to school, causing a rise in congestion and pollution.

• Diesel ban? Clean Air Zone expansion could see diesel cars charged to enter UK cities

Cycling UK, a charity supporting cyclists in the UK, said removing speed bumps would cause more accidents and fatalities on UK roads, as cars would be forced to slow down less.

Why speed humps should go

An earlier report by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) suggested removing speed humps, introducing more variable speed limits and creating ‘no idling zones’ for cars as possible measures to improve traffic flow.

The report by NICE highlighted that reducing ‘stop and go’ driving will help reduce congestion and in turn pollution on our roads.

It encourages councils to consider ways to ‘smooth’ out driving habits. It also points out that there are individual cases where evidence has shown that speed humps have increased vehicle emissions, but points out that this is not always backed by studies examining larger transport networks. 

Health experts believe that by bringing in measures to stop drivers speeding up and slowing down, emissions can be hugely reduced - road traffic causes more than 64 per cent of air pollution in urban areas. Air pollution and its health impact also costs the UK up to £18.6 billion a year.

An alternative to speed bumps suggested in the report is the introduction of 20mph speed zones in areas with stop-start traffic while real-time 50mph variable speed limits should be brought in on congested motorways to encourage free-flowing traffic.

Speaking to the BBC, Hugh Bladon, from the Alliance of British Drivers, said he welcomed the decision to remove speed humps as they increase pollution and decrease fuel economy due to drivers having to accelerate and decelerate. 

The Government said that any changes to road layouts to improve air quality would not come at a cost to road safety.

Would you like to see speed humps gone or not? What will the impact on road safety be? Let us know in the comments below...

Recommended

Coroner calls for smart motorway review following M1 deaths
smart motorway
News

Coroner calls for smart motorway review following M1 deaths

The deaths of two men in a smart motorway collision could have been avoided if there had been a hard shoulder, coroner rules
19 Jan 2021
Councils to get new powers to issue fines for traffic offences
Box junction
Consumer news

Councils to get new powers to issue fines for traffic offences

Local authorities will be able to fine drivers who commit moving traffic contraventions under legislation being drawn up
18 Jan 2021
UK drivers to escape EU speed camera fines due to Brexit
Citroen DS Eiffel Tower
Consumer news

UK drivers to escape EU speed camera fines due to Brexit

UK’s departure from the European Union puts an end to cross-border directive, leaving EU countries unable to enforce speeding penalties for drivers ca…
13 Jan 2021
Driverless car users may not be liable in accidents
Jaguar Land Rover autonomous testing - static
Consumer news

Driverless car users may not be liable in accidents

Law Commission proposes motorists in driverless cars should be renamed “users in charge” as part of “no-blame culture”
18 Dec 2020

Most Popular

'MG's sales must rank as the success story of the year, possibly the decade'
MG 2020
Opinion

'MG's sales must rank as the success story of the year, possibly the decade'

Mike Rutherford says plenty of big car brands could learn from MG's focus on cheap cars
17 Jan 2021
Brawny new Ford Ranger MS-RT launched
Ford Ranger MS-RT - front
Ford Ranger

Brawny new Ford Ranger MS-RT launched

Ford’s long-standing aftermarket partner, MS-RT, has launched a tweaked version of the Ranger with an aggressive body kit
18 Jan 2021
New 2022 Smart electric SUV to rival Peugeot e-2008
Smart SUV - front (watermarked)
Smart

New 2022 Smart electric SUV to rival Peugeot e-2008

The new Smart SUV will use an electric platform developed by Geely and our exclusive images preview how it could look
18 Jan 2021