Search Car Reviews



See all makes



Countryman vs X1 in 4x4 battle

SUVs meet up in head-to-head clash- £16k Countryman will undercut BMW by £7k

Countryman vs X1

By Conor Mills

15th February 2010

It's the head-to-head that SUV buyers have been waiting for! Auto Express has brought MINI’s controversial new Countryman together with its stablemate, the BMW X1, in an exclusive compact 4x4 encounter. 

So, how does the most radical and largest MINI ever compare with its BMW sibling? Well, the Countryman certainly wins on price – we can exclusively reveal that the entry-level Countryman One will kick off at £16,000, undercutting the X1 by a huge £7,325. In fact, even the range-topping model, the Cooper S ALL4, costs less than the cheapest X1 at £22,030.

The Countryman should be cheap to run, too. The 1.6-litre turbodiesel Cooper D emits only 113g/km of CO2, and should deliver 65mpg, while even the flagship Cooper S’s figure is only 157g/km. It is likely to return 40mpg. Inside, while the BMW has the larger boot – 420 litres versus 350 litres with the rear seats in place – the Countryman aims to offer just as much rear seat space. And it should be a match when it comes to material quality, too.

The Countryman will be well equipped – in addition to a standard CD player and air-con, buyers can opt for a panoramic roof, adaptive headlights and high-end audio and navigation.

Exterior options include alloy wheels ranging from 16 to 19 inches and lowered sports suspension. The Countryman makes its world debut at the Geneva Motor Show in March, and is set to go on sale in September.

Tell us about your car in our Driver Power survey.

What Next

Sponsored Results

6 Comments

Over-hyped

Neither of these two could cope with much more than a gravel drive when it comes to off roading. Save yourself and buy a second hand Range Rover !!! What is the point in putting 4x4 in these fakes?

By Scampscat on 17 February, 2010, 11:28am

Personal experience, scampscat?

Have you actually tried any of the "fakes"?
I shared your attitude, until I tried an X3 some years ago (could be classified as a faker too...?). Even hindered by a petrol engine and pure street tires, the X3 made it's way up and down a very steep, slightly damp forest incline, which no way in hell would have been possible with only 2WD. .... just saying...

By s_kvindal on 18 February, 2010, 8:31am

smaller and lighter the better

Owing a Land Rover and having had various other 4x4 cars, I found smaller and lighter the better for grassy, muddy or snowy inclines. Subaru Justy was the best. If you drive off road you will find that ability is mainly determined by the tyres rather than the vehicle.

By tjetters on 18 February, 2010, 8:48am

Snow joke?

I'm not entirely convinced by the soft-roader niche either, but in the recent icy weather, I'm sure that a road-biased 4WD system would have helped drivers to keep moving - although the extra traction is no help when it comes to trying to stop!
To be honest, though, for 90+% of the time, the extra cost, weight and fuel consumption of a 4WD car is not worth it.

By snappyuk on 18 February, 2010, 10:33am

The horror, the horror!

Ugliest Mini ever versus ugliest BMW ever. Who cares which one wins?

By baris_purut on 18 February, 2010, 1:29pm

indeed the horror....

I hadnt paid attention to the thing...but the Bmw x1 really is a seiously ugly car....I looks almost as if it came from Greatwalls design departement...ten years ago....proportions are horrible and they tried to hard to cram every single one of bmws new design cues into it...messy...ugly....out of proportions...

By darzelph on 19 February, 2010, 5:56pm

You need to register to post comments. Existing members can log in below to comment, otherwise click here to join.



Sponsored Results

- Advertisement -

Pictures

Countryman vs X1
Countryman vs X1

Sponsored Results

- Advertisement -