Mercedes ML320 CDI Sport

Is nip and tuck enough to keep the M-Class in contention?

  • Unlike its BMW rival, the M-Class doesn’t have the option of seven seats – Mercedes offers the larger GL-Class and R-Class models for that. As a result, it’s shorter than the X5, but also manages to provide more space for luggage. With the rear seats in place, the Mercedes has the longer load length, and its capacity is 213 litres up on the BMW. Crucially, the M-Class’s rear seats fold fully flat, providing a long and practical space for larger items.
  • Although the Mercedes’ CDI engine matches the BMW’s for refinement, it doesn’t have the same punch. With 510Nm, it’s 70Nm down on torque and has 45bhp less power. That makes its 254g/km CO2 output even more isappointing – emissions are 38g/km higher than the X5’s.

Bosses at Mercedes seem to be following that old adage: if it isn’t broken, then don’t fix it. The current M-Class is such a well rounded performer, the firm decided only minor modifications were required to take on the latest crop of premium SUVs.

In fact, you’ll need to look really closely to spot the changes. At the front, there are subtly modified headlamps, a slightly bigger grille and reprofiled bumpers.

Elsewhere you’ll find new door mirrors, while the tail-lamps get a smoked lens tint. Casual observers will be hard pressed to identify the newcomer over the outgoing model. That’s no bad thing, though, as the Merc has real presence and is much more imposing than the X5.

Climb aboard and there are even fewer changes. The main differences are the addition of a new multifunction steering wheel and more heavily bolstered front seats. Happily, the driver gets the same commanding view of the road as before, while the use of a steering column-mounted gearshift and foot-operated parking brake frees up space for two useful large cup-holders between the front seats.

Sadly, the revised car retains too many cheap plastics, meaning the Merc loses out to the BMW for cabin ambience. There’s plenty of space, though, with passengers in the rear getting generous leg and headroom.

Hit a button on the key fob and the electrically powered tailgate glides open to reveal an impressive 833 litres of carrying capacity – the BMW manages only 620 litres. Fold the rear bench flat and the M-Class serves up a van-like 2,050 litres.

While it has the upper hand for practicality, the Mercedes lags behind the X5 at the test track. Its 221bhp 3.0-litre V6 oil-burner is smooth, torquey and restful at a cruise, yet lacks the knock-out punch of its rival. In isolation, the 0-60mph time of 8.8 seconds looks impressive; compare the M-Class to the BMW, and it trails by more than two seconds. Not only is it slower, it’s thirstier, too. We only managed a disappointing 22.6mpg, compared to the 26.1mpg return of the rapid X5.

On the road, the Mercedes claws back some of the lost ground. Its smooth seven-speed automatic gearbox helps disguise the performance shortfall, while direct steering and strong grip mean it is capable when cornering.

Our test car was fitted with optional air-suspension, which gives you the choice of sport or comfort modes. Select the former and body roll is reduced. It still fails to match the agility of the X5, though, and ride comfort is also badly compromised.

With no more than cosmetic tweaks carried out, the M-Class has done little to modernise in the face of ever stiffer competition. Thankfully, the quality of engineering behind the German firm’s SUV means it’s still up to the challenge.


Price: £44,285Model tested: Mercedes ML320 CDI SportChart position: 2WHY: A round of revisions has given the M-Class sharper styling and more equipment.


Look at the spec lists, and there are some important differences between these two cars, despite their similar prices. For instance, the Mercedes has leather trim as standard, but it will cost you an extra £1,510 on the BMW. The M-Class also comes with Bluetooth phone connectivity, which adds a further £540 to the price of the X5. Include the extra £260 required to match the heated seats included as standard in the Mercedes, and you can see how much more you need to spend to get the same spec BMW. Yet apart from insurance, the M-Class loses out in every other respect, making it more costly to run here.


in the eco stakes, the Merc is disappointing. Not only do official CO2 emissions of 254g/km put it in the top tax band, but our 22.6mpg fuel returns were poor.

Most Popular

New electric MG Cyberster roadster to take brand back to its roots
MG roadster exclusive image - front

New electric MG Cyberster roadster to take brand back to its roots

The all-electric two-seat MG sports car is poised to follow the likes of the MG TF and MGB, and our exclusive images preview how it could look
23 Jun 2022
‘New Jaguar will be “a copy of nothing” – in every way’
Opinion - Jaguar

‘New Jaguar will be “a copy of nothing” – in every way’

Editor-in-chief Steve Fowler thinks Jaguar's rebirth is a risk worth taking
15 Jun 2022
New Alfa Romeo Tonale Quadrifoglio production to be decided by customer demand
Alfa Romeo Tonale Quadrifoglio

New Alfa Romeo Tonale Quadrifoglio production to be decided by customer demand

Customer interest will be a key factor in whether a proposed hot Alfa Romeo Tonale Quadrifoglio will reach showrooms
24 Jun 2022