Skip advert
Advertisement

Fiat Panda 100HP vs Nissan Note

Racy 100HP version of Italian baby appeals on many levels – but does it make more sense than practical Note?

Your heart says speed but your head says space – and if you have £10,000 to spend, that leaves you with some tough choices to make. For our money, the racy Fiat Panda 100HP is about as much fun as you can have at this level, but the Nissan Note is bigger, more efficient and has just been given a mid-life refresh. So which would we choose?

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Nissan is what your head wants as it provides small family car space in a supermini-sized package. This is thanks to its tall body – which compromises its looks. The revised Note gets a fresh grille and new headlights, but the changes are minor and the practical Nissan still isn’t a car you buy for its kerb appeal.

While its smaller Italian rival is just as boxy from the outside, its pumped-up looks set it apart from lesser models and will be sure to get your pulse racing. Attractive alloys, a lower ride height and sporty front bumper give the hot Fiat a much more purposeful stance. We’re not so convinced by its tinted side windows and go-faster stripes, but the boy racer looks are part and parcel of the appeal.

Inside, you’ll be amazed at the space on offer in both cars. While you get more in the Note, the Panda is incredibly user-friendly given its exterior dimensions. It really falls behind in terms of luggage capacity, though, with a 206-litre boot.

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement - Article continues below

Used - available now

XC40

2021 Volvo

XC40

61,500 milesAutomaticDiesel2.0L

Cash £18,990
View XC40
XC40

2026 Volvo

XC40

18,788 milesAutomaticPetrol2.0L

Cash £28,990
View XC40
XC90

2022 Volvo

XC90

49,500 milesAutomaticDiesel2.0L

Cash £30,990
View XC90
XC40

2022 Volvo

XC40

85,500 milesAutomaticPetrol1.5L

Cash £15,290
View XC40

In contrast, the Nissan has a sliding back bench, which allows you to optimise rear legroom or load carrying ability. And even with the seats in their rearmost position it offers 280 litres of stowage. Hit the road, and the Fiat fights back. Its lively 1.4-litre engine feels faster than the figures suggest. Fiat claims it covers 0-62mph in 9.5 seconds, yet its raucous engine and firm ride add to the impression of speed. It’s also comfortably quicker than the Note, which completes the sprint in 13.4 seconds.

Advertisement - Article continues below

On the move, the stiffly sprung Fiat is busy and uncomfortable in town, but makes more sense at higher speeds. The revvy engine, agile handling and tiny proportions make it an absolute riot to drive along twisty roads. It can be unruly and will spin its inside front wheel if you get on the power early out of bends, although this doesn’t detract from the sense of fun. A sixth gear means decent motorway refinement, too.

While the taller Note can’t hope to compete on traditional British B-roads, it’s much more accomplished in the city. The cabin has a more grown-up feel, which is partly down to improved switchgear. And what about price? Well, we’ve cheated slightly because both cars break our theoretical £10,000 budget – but we’d be surprised if you can’t haggle below our self-imposed limit in Nissan and Fiat dealerships.

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement - Article continues below

 With improved equipment and a new look, you would expect prices for the Note to have increased. Instead, the firm has dropped them. A 1.4-litre Visia model with air-con can be yours for £10,295, while the go-faster Fiat is slightly more expensive at £10,395.

The Note’s sliding rear seat is fitted as standard, but the Visia gets few of the luxuries fitted to the flagship Tekna we used for our pictures. It makes do with steel wheels and manual rear windows, while our test model’s integrated Nissan Connect sat-nav isn’t even an option. Step into the Fiat and it’s fitted with climate control and Bluetooth phone connection as standard, on top of its racy styling additions. The trade-off comes at the pumps. The hot Panda returns 43.5mpg combined and emits 154g/km of CO2; the 1.4-litre Note offers 47.9mpg and 139g/km. That’s enough to impact on your annual fuel bill and place the Nissan in a lower road tax bracket than the Fiat, providing a further saving.

While all this makes sense to the head, the Note’s miserly kit grates at this price. If you see a Panda 100HP go past, you will get a pang of regret. Will the Fiat driver feel the same about the sensible Note?

Skip advert
Advertisement

New & used car deals

Toyota Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

RRP £27,245Avg. savings £2,053 off RRP*Used from £15,202
Omoda 5

Omoda 5

RRP £23,990Avg. savings £1,535 off RRP*
Nissan Juke

Nissan Juke

RRP £19,785Avg. savings £4,644 off RRP*Used from £9,562
Vauxhall Corsa

Vauxhall Corsa

RRP £19,690Avg. savings £5,988 off RRP*Used from £10,549
* Average savings are calculated daily based on the best dealer prices on Auto Express vs manufacturer RRP
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Jaecoo 7 recalled: a quarter of all brand’s 2025 UK cars going back to dealers
Jaecoo 7 - front action

Jaecoo 7 recalled: a quarter of all brand’s 2025 UK cars going back to dealers

The Chinese brand has initiated a recall for roughly 7,500 Jaecoo 7 models due to an incorrectly attached wiring harness clip
News
6 Mar 2026
New Dacia Jogger Hybrid 155 review: frugal family car makes tons of sense in town
Dacia Jogger Hybrid 155 - front tracking

New Dacia Jogger Hybrid 155 review: frugal family car makes tons of sense in town

Dacia's MPV goes well with hybrid power, but it can get a bit thirsty on longer trips
Road tests
6 Mar 2026
New Mazda CX-5 2026 review: spacious SUV is a step in the wrong direction
Auto Express news reporter Ellis Hyde standing next to a Mazda CX-5

New Mazda CX-5 2026 review: spacious SUV is a step in the wrong direction

The new CX-5 a fair bit different to the old model, but that's not necessarily a good thing
Road tests
6 Mar 2026