Skip advert
Advertisement

Real-world car emissions and fuel economy are 20% worse than advertised figures

European Commission has found that, on average, most cars are far less fuel efficient and environmentally friendly than official WLTP test results suggest

Emissions tests questioned

A new study has found that, on average, fuel economy and CO2 emissions are roughly 20 per cent worse than the official WLTP figures suggest.

The report, courtesy of the European Commission, studied a sample of 600,000 cars and found that petrol cars are typically 24 per cent more inefficient and polluting than what their official WLTP ratings may suggest, while diesel models fall 18% shy of their emissions and MPG targets.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Even worse are plug-in hybrid (PHEV) cars. According to the Commission, PHEVs typically emit three-and-a-half times more CO2 in real-world driving than what’s officially shown in the WLTP test results.  

To combat this, the EU is set to implement revised tests for PHEVs in 2025, which have tweaked the “calculation of the utility factor – the expected share of distance driven electrically”. In plain English, the tests will be adjusted using real-world data to provide a more accurate representation of when the car uses electric power and when the petrol engine eventually kicks in.

Still, the Commission’s report states that “further steps are needed to significantly improve monitoring in the coming years” in terms of making the WLTP tests more stringent and representative of everyday driving. This means taking into account more things like weather, air conditioning use and the gradient of the road.

At Auto Express, we are constantly testing new cars in real-world driving conditions and have long emphasised to our readers that WLTP figures really are “best-case scenarios”. Take, for example, our recent twin test between the Mercedes GLA 250e and the Alfa Romeo Tonale. Both cars’ plug-in hybrid powertrains failed to get anywhere near the 250 miles+ suggested by the WLTP tests, instead both achieved less than 40mpg. 

The WLTP tests replaced the old NEDC fuel economy and emissions tests in 2017 and did make the results more indicative of what was achievable in real-world driving. There it still a significant gap, however, between these laboratory test figures and what motorists can expect to achieve when driving their cars. 

Can you get close to the official WLTP fuel economy figures in your car? Let us know in the comments? 
 

Skip advert
Advertisement
Consumer reporter

Tom is Auto Express' Consumer reporter, meaning he spends his time investigating the stories that matter to all motorists - enthusiasts or otherwise. An ex-BBC journalist and Multimedia Journalism graduate, Tom previously wrote for partner sites Carbuyer and DrivingElectric and you may also spot him throwing away his dignity by filming videos for the Auto Express social media channels.

Find a car with the experts

Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

New Peugeot 208 GTi: electric hot hatch gets stunning looks and plenty of power
Peugeot E-208 GTi - reveal front

New Peugeot 208 GTi: electric hot hatch gets stunning looks and plenty of power

Hot Peugeot E-208 gets racier styling, 276bhp and does 0-62mph in just 5.7 seconds
News
13 Jun 2025
New BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort review: the best BYD yet
BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort - front

New BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort review: the best BYD yet

The new BYD Dolphin Surf Comfort is arguably the Chinese brand's most convincing model in its range
Road tests
11 Jun 2025
New entry-level Renault Symbioz is £3k cheaper than a Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz hybrid - front angled

New entry-level Renault Symbioz is £3k cheaper than a Nissan Qashqai

The Renault Captur has also been fitted the new full-hybrid powertrain, which gets a bigger battery for more pure-electric driving
News
12 Jun 2025