Skip advert
Advertisement

'Why did Chancellor Hammond make taxpayers fund electric car battery development?'

Instead of forcing taxpayers to fund EV battery tech, Mike Rutherford asks why the battery industry isn't paying for it itself

As a former Transport Secretary, Philip Hammond knows all about drivers, the vehicles they use, highways they drive and frustrations they endure. What’s more, he’s more aware than most that we drivers cough up £165million a day in road-user taxation (vehicles, fuel, vehicle insurance, etc), tolls, duties, levies and other iffy charges. This £60billion per annum goes direct to HM Treasury – a department he now runs as Chancellor.

Advertisement - Article continues below

I was expecting – and thankfully, heard – a largely driver-friendly Budget speech from him last week. True, he broke taxation promises previously published in his Conservative party manifesto, although he didn’t give motorists the sort of brutal kicking they’ve suffered in the past.

'The Government and car makers must do more to sell EVs'

But with so many comparatively cheap and easy fixes desperately needed on the roads – pothole repairs, white line repainting, sign replacement – why instead decree taxpayers must spend hundreds of millions funding the development of batteries for electric cars? Surely the lethargic but lucrative battery industry should be paying for such improvements?

It’s a similar story with the development of electric and driverless vehicles to which Hammond is committing hundreds of our millions;  the motor manufacturing corporations should be working on these at their expense, not ours. The British Government couldn’t (or wouldn’t) stump up the cash to save Rover and Longbridge. Toyota in Burnaston and Swindon’s Honda, plus others who make popular cars in Britain, are getting nowt in state hand-outs. Yet ‘developers’ of unconventional equivalents are being heavily subsidised. Is this fair – or legal?

'Why doesn't the Government issue guidance on the cars it recommends?'

The Chancellor’s £690m “competition” for local authorities to tackle urban congestion is equally bonkers. If there are prizes to be had, why are they going to often ‘anti-car’ councils? Rewards for motorists submitting much-needed congestion solutions would be preferable, as would a road infrastructure improvement programme the Government’s own research proves is desperately needed.  

And why, oh why, did he further demoralise world-class Brit workers by telling us we’re 35 per cent behind the Germans in productivity terms? It’s an insult. And, just like the manifesto promise of “no increases” in National Insurance contributions, it’s a lie. 

What do you think of Hammond's budget? Let us know below...

Skip advert
Advertisement
Chief columnist

Mike was one of the founding fathers of Auto Express in 1988. He's been motoring editor on four tabloid newspapers - London Evening News, The Sun, News of the World & Daily Mirror. He was also a weekly columnist on the Daily Telegraph, The Independent and The Sunday Times. 

Find a car with the experts

Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Chinese cars can’t match their European rivals when it comes to engineering
Opinion - Shanghai Auto Show

Chinese cars can’t match their European rivals when it comes to engineering

This new brand of cars might have battery tech on their side, but European buyers want much more than that
Opinion
25 Apr 2025
New electric car MoT tests could be coming to the UK
Tesla Model X on two-post inspection ramp

New electric car MoT tests could be coming to the UK

New technology and driver assistance systems require changes to annual testing, says EC
News
25 Apr 2025
Buying a modern used car for under £10k is almost impossible
Opinion - £10k used cars

Buying a modern used car for under £10k is almost impossible

Phil McNamara discovers that it’s harder than ever to find a good-value car at the affordable end of the market
Opinion
24 Apr 2025