Skip advert
Advertisement

Ford Focus

One year and 18,000 miles later, we give our final verdict on life with the Focus ST-2

  • ENGINE: with lots of torque and no turbo lag, the five-cylinder unit provides searing acceleration. It sounds brilliant, too.HANDLING: the engineers have done a good job. The ST mixes crisp steering and a fine chassis balance with a comfortable ride.SEATS: they may be mounted too high, but the Recaro seats are the best I have ever tried, providing lots of support for my 6ft 3in frame.
  • ECONOMY: so thirsty! Even the most light-footed cruising returned little more than 30mpg. Hard driving saw it drop below 20mpg.MANOEUVRABILITY: the penalty for quick steering is a lack of lock, which makes five-point turns a regular occurrence.TRACTION: it’s fine in the dry, but lacking in the wet with torque steer under hard acceleration, particularly on poor road surfaces.
Find your Ford Focus
Offers from our trusted partners on this car and its predecessors...
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Customers got an average £1000 more vs part exchange quotes
Advertisement

It’s all been a bit of a blur! That’s the best way to describe my 12 months with the Focus ST. The fast Ford has had a hectic year at Auto Express, racking up nearly 18,000 miles, completing several group tests and track battles with supercars along the way.

But has it kept me smiling? Most definitely. I raved about the ST’s 222bhp 2.5-litre five-cylinder turbo in my first report (Issue 921), and if there’s one memory that will stay with me, it’s the engine.

With an offbeat warble under hard acceleration and heaps of performance, the punchy unit gave the Focus huge appeal. The handling impressed, too. Despite battling against a group of motors that included a Porsche 911 Turbo and Lamborghini Gallardo, EK06OHF held its own at our Greatest Drives feature. Our test team loved its communicative steering, front-end grip and brilliant poise.

However, while dry traction was good, it suffered in the wet, as 320Nm of torque struggled to reach the tarmac. Speed bumps and potholes easily messed with the wheel alignment, too.

Tyre wear wasn’t too bad, though. Despite a hard life, the original front Continental Sport Contact 2s lasted 12,000 miles. And when it came to a service 500 miles later, I was pleased with the reasonable bill of £223 and the efficiency of dealer Dagenham Motors in Highbury, north London.

Other costs included a new rear window, after the ST was the victim of a break-in, and quite a lot of fuel receipts – we averaged 23.5mpg.

The result was a range of barely 220 miles, which limited the ST’s otherwise excellent long-distance ability. Further gripes include the lack of steering lock, which made manoeuvring frustrating, and a cabin that never felt really special.

However, options such as sat-nav and a Bluetooth phone connection were easy to operate, while the five-door body is practical. Overall, the ST is hard to beat. Not many cars can match its character, performance and comfort.
It will be sorely missed...

Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

Renault Symbioz 2024 preview: walkaround, specs and full details
Renault Symbioz - studio front
News

Renault Symbioz 2024 preview: walkaround, specs and full details

The all-new Renault Symbioz family crossover should start from under £30,000 when order books open in July
2 May 2024
New Suzuki Swift 2024 review: a supermini value champion
Suzuki Swift - front
Road tests

New Suzuki Swift 2024 review: a supermini value champion

The new Suzuki Swift has arrived in the UK to take on a dwindling number of supermini rivals
2 May 2024
New Kia Picanto facelift is still one of the cheapest cars on sale
Kia Picanto facelift - front
News

New Kia Picanto facelift is still one of the cheapest cars on sale

The facelifted Kia Picanto city car has arrived and starts at £15,595
1 May 2024