BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs Citroen C4 Picasso & Mazda CX-5
The new front-wheel-drive 2 Series Active Tourer MPV is a revolution for BMW. But is it a class leader?
For the past few years, BMW has been hard at work filling every available niche in the new car market, but the latest addition is the most ambitious yet. The 2 Series Active Tourer is not only the company’s first-ever MPV, it’s the first model to feature front-wheel drive.
This departure from the brand’s sporty image and rear-wheel-drive roots is sure to upset loyal fans, but will also open it up to a vast array of buyers who’d never before have considered a BMW. And with its spacious and beautifully finished five-seat cabin, upmarket looks and low running costs, the Active Tourer is sure to appeal. Plus, bosses claim the car should be as fun to drive as a traditional BMW.
In its first test, it faces two formidable family car rivals. Citroen’s stylish C4 Picasso mixes bold looks, a versatile interior and great refinement, and is as desirable as it is practical. Then there’s the Mazda CX-5, which boasts rugged looks, lots of space, fine handling and ultra-low running costs. But which family car takes the spoils?
More reviews for 2 Series Active Tourer
Car group tests
- New BMW M235i xDrive Gran Coupe 2020 review
- New BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe 2020 review
- New BMW M2 CS prototype review
Used car tests
Click the links above to read individual reviews, and scroll down to see which car came out on top in this test...
The roomy Citroen crosses the line first in the space race. Even in its smallest configuration, the 537-litre boot is the biggest here, while there are three full-size rear seats with plenty of head and legroom.
The BMW is almost as spacious inside, although its 468-litre boot is the smallest with the seats in place. Slotting between the two is the Mazda, which features a bigger boot than the Active Tourer but a more cramped rear bench.
Counting the cost
Not only is the Picasso the most practical car, it’ll cost the least to run. Emissions of 113g/km make it the cheapest company choice, and we recorded an excellent 48.6mpg. The £27,755 BMW is the priciest option, but its BIK tax bills are only slightly up on the C4’s. Still, neither car can beat the Mazda’s excellent 48.1 per cent predicted residuals.
On the road
The Active Tourer is the first-ever front-wheel-drive BMW, but thanks to the know-how of sister brand MINI it feels composed and capable from behind the wheel. Even so, it can’t match the agile Mazda for driver fun, while the soft Citroen takes the honours for comfort.
1st place: Citroen C4 Picasso
It’s another win for the C4 Picasso – although its margin of victory is slim on this occasion. Bold styling, a hugely practical cabin and excellent refinement are highlights, plus it doesn’t cost a lot to run and comes with loads of standard kit. It’s not quite as sharp to drive as its rivals here, but as a versatile and spacious family car, the Citroen has the edge.
2nd place: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
If you’re looking for a classy, refined and beautifully built family car, the Active Tourer takes some beating. Its slickly designed cabin has a real feelgood factor, while the all-new front-wheel-drive underpinnings deliver assured handling. Yet it can’t match the best in the class for space and practicality, and it’s not as generously equippedas the Citroen and Mazda.
3rd place: Mazda CX-5
In isolation, the smartly styled, frugal and spacious Mazda makes a strong case for itself. Its 2.2-litre diesel is one of the best in the business, while the sharp handling is remarkable for such a high-riding car. Unfortunately, the CX-5’s cabin isn’t as thoughtfully designed as the Citroen’s, while it can’t match the premium appeal or low running costs of the BMW.
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs rivals: key specs and data
|Citroen C4 Picasso 2.0 HDi Exclusive+||BMW 218d Active Tourer Luxury Auto||Mazda CX-5 2.2D Sport Nav|
|On the road price/total as tested||£25,410/£28,430||£27,755/£35,480||£26,695/£27,235|
|Residual value (after 3yrs/36,000)||£11,460/45.1%||£12,295/44.3%||£12,840/48.1%|
|Annual tax liability std/higher rate||£913/£1,826||£942/£1,884||£1,012/£2,025|
|Annual fuel cost (12k/20k miles)||£1,496/£2,494||£1,605/£2,676||£1,627/£2,712|
|Ins. group/quote/road tax band/cost||24/£355/C/£30||18/TBC/B/£20||19/£400/C/£30|
|Cost of 1st/2nd/3rd service||£115/£195/£115||£375 (5yrs/60k)||£499 (3yrs/36k)|
|Engine||4cyl in-line/1,997cc||4cyl in-line/1,995cc||4cyl in-line/2,191cc|
|Peak power/revs||148/4,000 bhp/rpm||148/4,000 bhp/rpm||148/4,500 bhp/rpm|
|Peak torque/revs||370/2,000 Nm/rpm||330/1,750 Nm/rpm||380/1,800 Nm/rpm|
|Transmission||6-spd man/fwd||8-spd auto/fwd||6-spd man/fwd|
|Fuel tank capacity/spare wheel||55 litres/foam||51 litres/run-flats||56 litres/foam|
|Boot capacity||537-630/1,851 litres||468/1,510 litres||503/1,620 litres|
|Turning circle/drag coefficient||10.8 metres/N/A||11.3 metres/0.27Cd||11.7 metres/N/A|
|Basic warranty (miles)/recovery||3yrs (60,000)/1yr||3yrs (unltd)/3yrs||3yrs (60,000)/3yrs|
|Service intervals/UK dealers||12,500 (1yr)/196||Variable (1yr)/153||12,500 (1yr)/170|
|Driver Power manufacturer/dealer pos.||26th/23rd||10th/22nd||8th/12th|
|0-60/30-70mph||9.6/9.1 secs||8.8/8.7 secs||8.4/7.9 secs|
|30-50mph in 3rd/4th||3.9/6.9 secs||3.6/4.6 secs||3.1/4.5 secs|
|50-70mph in 5th/6th/7th/8th||8.3/11.3 secs||5.8/7.0/9.3/12.3 secs||5.9/8.0 secs|
|Top speed/rpm at 70mph||130mph/2,000rpm||129mph/1,800rpm||126mph/2,000rpm|
|Auto Express econ (mpg/mpl)/range||48.6/10.8/588 miles||45.3/10.0/508 miles||44.7/9.9/551 miles|
|Actual/claimed CO2/tax bracket||156/113g/km/18%||167/109g/km/17%||169/119g/km/19%|
|Automatic box/stability/cruise ctrl||No/yes/yes||Yes/yes/yes||No/yes/yes|
|Climate ctrl/leather/heated seats||Yes/£1,750/£1,750*||Yes/yes/£295||Yes/yes/yes|
|Met paint/xenon lights/keyless go||£520/£750/yes||£550/£745^/£350||£540/yes/yes|