Skip advert
Advertisement

Ford Galaxy AWD review

Four-wheel drive gives seven-seat Ford Galaxy extra grip for winter weather

Find your Ford Galaxy
Compare deals from trusted partners on this car and previous models.
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Value my car
Fast, no-nonsense car selling
Value my car

As with the S-MAX AWD, the Ford Galaxy AWD is difficult to justify in the UK market due to its higher running costs and purchase price. It’s still good to drive, practical and has plenty of equipment on board, so don’t be put off the seven-seater as a whole. We’d just save some money and go for the front-wheel-drive version instead.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Ford’s all-wheel-drive range continues to expand, with this new Galaxy AWD being added to the line-up just in time for the cold snap to hit most of the UK.

Best seven-seater cars on the market

When we drove the S-MAX AWD, we decided it wasn’t worth the extra money over a regular front-wheel-drive model unless you expect to be spending a lot of time in challenging conditions. And unsurprisingly, it’s the same story with the new four-wheel-drive Galaxy, which costs around £1,500 more than the otherwise identical 2WD car.

The extra 58kg added by the AWD system means efficiency takes a hit: the car claims 52.3mpg fuel economy compared to 56.5mpg and 139g/km emissions instead of 129g/km, so it will be more expensive to run. It’s slower, too, getting from 0-62mph in 12.2 seconds compared to 10.9 seconds for the equivalent front-driven version.

• Best people carriers and MPVs

Around Ford’s proving ground in Lommel, Belgium, the four-wheel-drive Galaxy served up plenty of grip, even over the slippery cobblestone section. There’s quite a bit of body roll in corners, but that’s to be expected from a large MPV like this – and it’s partially the result of a more comfort-biased suspension set-up. The steering is well weighted, too, and while wind noise at motorway speeds is noticeable, it’s not overly intrusive.

All of this is true of the standard front-wheel-drive car as well, though. The boot capacity is unchanged at 300 litres with all seven seats in place and 1,301 litres with the third row of seats folded flat, which is good news. However, you really don’t get much for your £1,500 extra if most of your driving takes place on normal British roads.

Very few cars in this class have four-wheel drive, so the Galaxy fills a niche where Ford clearly sees potential customers – but for most people we’d recommend the standard front-wheel-drive model, and we’d push those who do want to head off-road in the direction of a Land Rover Discovery Sport.

Skip advert
Advertisement

New & used car deals

Audi A3

Audi A3

RRP £26,295Avg. savings £4,213 off RRP*Used from £10,995
Nissan Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

RRP £27,415Avg. savings £6,037 off RRP*Used from £10,399
Toyota Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

RRP £27,245Avg. savings £2,529 off RRP*Used from £15,199
Renault Clio

Renault Clio

RRP £16,160Avg. savings £3,398 off RRP*Used from £7,195
* Average savings are calculated daily based on the best dealer prices on Auto Express vs manufacturer RRP
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

New Jaguar GT: latest details on the groundbreaking 1,000bhp four-door EV
Jaguar GT - front (exclusive image)

New Jaguar GT: latest details on the groundbreaking 1,000bhp four-door EV

Jaguar’s four-door GT will have more power than a Bugatti Veyron, but it also weighs nearly a tonne more too!
News
9 Feb 2026
Tesla has dropped its Standards: entry-level Model Y and Model 3 renamed
Tesla Model Y - front 3/4

Tesla has dropped its Standards: entry-level Model Y and Model 3 renamed

Just a few months after Tesla introduced the Standard name for its more basic models, it’s been dropped
News
6 Feb 2026
Long-term test: Nissan Qashqai e-Power Tekna+
Nissan Qashqai e-Power Tekna+ - header

Long-term test: Nissan Qashqai e-Power Tekna+

First report: popular family SUV makes a good first impression on our fleet
Long-term tests
10 Feb 2026