Used car tests

Used Honda CR-V review

A full used buyer’s guide to the Honda CR-V covering the CR-V Mk3 (2006-2012)

As long as you don’t need more than five seats, the CR-V is a great buy thanks to its dependability, comfort, generous equipment levels and strength. Running costs can be high, especially for petrol models, plus you’ll regret not buying a diesel if you’re planning to tow. As with most cars of this type, the CR-V isn’t designed for serious off-road driving but, while there are plenty of more accomplished compact SUVs out there on the used market, the CR-V can be a good choice if you’re on a budget. Just bear in mind that, as with any compact sports utility vehicle, a CR-V will never be as cheap to run as a family-focused estate car or hatch.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Back in 1994, the Toyota RAV4 was launched and was the first compact SUV to feature the refinement and usability of a family car. Just three years later, Honda introduced its own take on the formula: the original CR-V.

That car achieved critical acclaim and its successor, launched in 2002, raised the bar significantly. So expectations were high when the third CR-V arrived in 2006, and we weren’t disappointed.

Advertisement - Article continues below

It was decent to drive, had a spacious cabin and Honda’s legendary reliability also came as standard. The killer punch, however, was a part-time four-wheel-drive system that cut in only when it was needed, making the CR-V more efficient than many of its rivals. 

Models covered

  • Honda CR-V Mk3 (2006-2012) - Family-friendly SUV is a solid choice, although running costs can be steep.

Honda CR-V Mk3


The third-generation CR-V was launched in December 2006, with a choice of 148bhp 2.0-litre petrol or 138bhp 2.2-litre turbodiesel engines and SE, ES and EX trim levels. The petrol engine was offered with an automatic gearbox, but there was no auto option for the diesel motor until a facelifted CR-V reached showrooms in January 2010. This update also brought a new front bumper and grille, redesigned alloy wheels and better cabin materials.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Refinement was improved, too, while a cleaner, more powerful 148bhp 2.2-litre diesel, now badged i-DTEC, was introduced in place of the previous i-CTDi unit. New colours and optional adaptive cruise control were offered, plus auto emergency braking on the EX edition. 

Honda CR-V Mk3 reviews

Honda CR-V in-depth review

Which one should I buy?

The diesel motor feels a lot more punchy than its petrol alternative, and it’s much more frugal as well, but asking prices are significantly higher and the petrol car is more reliable.

We’d opt for a manual rather than an automatic, because the latter transmission isn’t all that slick and it’s also less economical. All CR-Vs are well equipped and even the entry-level SE comes with powered windows all round, ESP, trailer stability assist and air-con.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The ES brings 17-inch alloy wheels, parking sensors front and rear, and dual-zone climate control. The range-topping EX also features 18-inch alloys, electric driver’s seat adjustment, leather trim, heated front seats, a panoramic glass roof and satellite navigation.

Alternatives to the Honda CR-V Mk3

The CR-V has no shortage of talented rivals, including the Toyota RAV4 and Nissan X-Trail. Both have similar kit levels, engine choices and price tags, but be careful of problems with the Nissan’s diesel motor.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Land Rover Freelander 2 is good to drive, has a strong image and comes with excellent engines, but used prices and running costs tend to be high, plus it doesn’t have the best reliability record. Volkswagen’s Tiguan is another CR-V rival that’s a good option, thanks to its efficient engines, excellent build quality and practicality.

Ford’s Kuga is more affordable and better to drive than most SUVs. Look at the Volvo XC60 if safety is a priority.

What to look for:


Make sure the air-conditioning or climate control works properly; compressors can fail, particularly on early models.

Light leaks

Rear light clusters can leak, leading to condensation building up on the inside of the lens, especially in cold weather.

Flat battery

Electrics are generally reliable on the CR-V, but batteries can go flat due to the ignition switch leaking current. 

Flaky paint

Door handles are painted silver; they’re not chrome-plated. This paint can peel off; new handles are the only proper fix.


The quality of materials used in the cabin isn’t in keeping with Honda’s semi-premium status, and the dash design is muddled. Yet the seats are comfortable and practicality is boosted by a sliding rear seat. Boot space isn’t spectacular, at 556 litres with the rear seats up, and while they fold flat, capacity is only boosted to 955 litres.

Running costs

A service is required every 12 months or 12,500 miles. These alternate between minor and major and cost £210 or £280 for petrol models, and £230 or £300 for diesels. After its third birthday, a CR-V is eligible for cut-price Honda servicing, costing £165 or £270 for petrol cars, and £185 or £290 for diesels.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Both engines are chain-driven, so there are no belts to replace. Brake fluid is needed every three years or 37,500 miles at £55, but this, like coolant (replaced every five years or 62,500 miles at £75), is included in services. An air-con re-gas costs £55. 


The CR-V Mk3 has been recalled five times. Vehicles manufactured from November 2009 to January 2010 could suffer from leaky injectors and fuel pipes, while diesel models built between August and October 2010 were at risk of having cracked fuel pump seals.

CR-Vs made from July 2008 to June 2010 could suffer power-steering failure. Airbag faults led to two further recalls for cars built up to the start of 2010. 

Driver Power owner satisfaction

The CR-V Mk3 last appeared in our Driver Power satisfaction survey in 2016, when it came 125th; the previous year it was 144th. Practicality was easily the car’s most popular attribute, while seat comfort was okay, too. Handling, performance and running costs were weak areas, while reliability (101st place) disappointed.


Most Popular

New Skoda Octavia vRS 2020 ride review
Skoda Octavia vRS Hatchback

New Skoda Octavia vRS 2020 ride review

We get our first taste of 242bhp Skoda Octavia vRS with Skoda tech development boss Christian Strube in the driver’s seat
10 Jul 2020
SEAT Leon vs Volkswagen Golf vs Ford Focus
Family hatchbacks

SEAT Leon vs Volkswagen Golf vs Ford Focus

The Ford Focus, Volkswagen Golf and SEAT Leon are all long established hatchbacks - we find out which is best among the latest crop
11 Jul 2020
New Mercedes GLA 220d diesel 2020 review
Mercedes GLA SUV

New Mercedes GLA 220d diesel 2020 review

The second generation Mercedes GLA small SUV improves on its predecessor in every area
10 Jul 2020