Skoda Kodiaq - MPG, emissions & running costs
The Skoda Kodiaq’s petrol and diesel engines are efficient, but some trims breach the £40,000 tax limit
![New car deals logo](https://media.autoexpress.co.uk/image/private/s--ofglJH7v--/f_auto,t_manufacturer-logo-mobile@1/v1562241546/autoexpress/1000px-skoda_auto_logo_2011.svg_.jpg)
![carwow logo](/public/partners/partner--carwow.png)
![carwow logo](/public/partners/partner--carwow.png)
The Skoda Kodiaq is surprisingly efficient despite being larger than the old model thanks to improvements in drag coefficient (now 0.28 compared to 0.31 of the first generation), and a range of efficient engines. The 1.5-litre petrol has cylinder deactivation technology that’ll switch off two cylinders at a constant cruise to save on petrol, and returns a fuel efficiency of 47.4mpg on a combined cycle. That easily beats the old Kodiaq’s non-hybrid 1.5-litre petrol, which barely got over 40mpg - although the new car’s figure does drop to 46.2mpg in the seven-seater.
The diesel is even more frugal, as you’d expect, with 53.2mpg (51.7mpg in the seven-seater) and the more powerful 4x4 diesel returning 44.1mpg, making it more frugal than the Kia Sorento and Hyundai Santa Fe with their 2.2-litre diesels. During our test, we managed to coax 47.7mpg out of the 148bhp diesel seven-seat model on a mixture of roads.
The petrol and diesels' emissions numbers are all in a similar ballpark. The mild hybrids predictably emit less (136g/km and 139g/km for the five- and seven-seater, respectively), while the diesels emit 139g/km to 143g/km in the 148bhp model, although the extra weight of the 190bhp model with seven-seats and four-wheel drive increases emissions to 168g/km.
More reviews
Car group tests
In-depth reviews
Road tests
- New Skoda Kodiaq vRS 2022 review
- New Skoda Kodiaq SportLine 2021 review
- New Skoda Vision iV concept review
Used car tests
The plug-in hybrid's fuel efficiency hasn’t been revealed yet, but it’ll certainly be the best version to run for company car drivers – as long as the battery is topped up. With 62 miles of electric-only running, it matches the Volkswagen Tiguan plug-in hybrid for electric range – hardly surprising given it shares the same PHEV system. During our test, we got a real-world predicted range of 55 miles, which isn’t too bad.
Model |
MPG |
CO2 |
Insurance group |
Kodiaq SE 2.0 TDI 150 2WD |
53.2mpg |
139g/km |
20E |
Kodiaq SE L 2.0 TDI 193 4WD |
44.1mpg |
168g/km |
26E |
Kodiaq SE 1.5 MHEV 2WD |
47.4mpg |
136g/km |
18E |
Electric range, battery life and charge time
With a 40kW charging capacity, you can recharge the 25.7kWh battery from 10-80 per cent in 25 minutes, meaning most could realistically run the Kodiaq iV on electric power for the majority of journeys – although rapid charging a PHEV would be a lot more expensive than plugging it in at home on a cheaper overnight tariff.
Warranty information regarding the battery pack hasn’t been announced yet, but we know that the similar Volkswagen Tiguan plug-in hybrid is guaranteed to retain 70 per cent capacity over five years and 100,000 miles. We anticipate the Kodiaq having a similar warranty period.
Tax
You will have to pay £270 in car tax for the mild-hybrid petrol and the lesser diesel models although it’s worth remembering the higher-spec SE L with seven seats costs over £40,000, and will incur an additional fee of £410 a year for five years from the second time the vehicle is taxed. The 190bhp diesel will cost £680 a year to tax. The plug-in hybrid should avoid the first-year road tax fee due to it being an alternative fuel vehicle, but we’ll have to wait for pricing to be announced to find out if it’ll cost more than £40,000 when new.
Insurance groups
It shouldn’t prove to be too costly to insure a Skoda Kodiaq because the entry-level 1.5 in SE trim is in insurance group 18, while the most potent diesel in four-wheel drive form is in group 26 – the same as the equivalent four-wheel drive diesel Hyundai Santa Fe.
Depreciation
According to our expert data, the Skoda Kodiaq isn’t going to retain its value quite as well after three years and 36,000 miles as its predecessor, maintaining between 42 to 50 per cent of its original value. The best is the least expensive 1.5 SE in five-seater form, while the 2.0 TDI 193 SE L will lose the most.
For a large SUV that’ll maintain more of its value, try looking at the Kia Sorento, which will maintain between 49 to 55 per cent of its value over the same period.
To get an accurate valuation of a specific model, check out our valuation tool…
Which Is Best
Cheapest
- Name1.5 TSI e-TEC SE 5dr DSG
- Gearbox typeAuto
- Price£36,645
Most Economical
- Name1.5 TSI iV 204 SE 5dr DSG
- Gearbox typeAuto
- Price£41,935
Fastest
- Name2.0 TDI 193 SE L 4X4 5dr DSG [7 Seat]
- Gearbox typeAuto
- Price£46,225