Honda CR-Z

Does the mid-spec version Honda's sporty hybrid coupé add up?

Overall Auto Express Rating

4.0 out of 5

ALTHOUGH the CR-Z might seem expensive for what’s essentially a two-seater, when you consider that a Toyota Prius costs a lot more without offering anything in the way of driver appeal, it starts to make sense. Despite a lack of outright pace, it is superbly engineered, has lively handling and accurate controls. The sharp styling also makes it a tempting prospect, and this mid-spec Sport trim model offers the best value in the range.  

Honda’s futuristic sports car is here! We’ve already tested the hybrid CR-Z coupé in flagship GT form (Issue 1,109), but does it still add up in mid-spec Sport trim?

With a price tag of £17,999, it offers buyers a significant saving of £2,000 over the GT, but does without leather seats and satellite-navigation.

Video: watch CarBuyer's video review of the CR-Z

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"content_narrow","fid":"69268","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image"}}]]

Under the skin, it shares the same technology. The smooth 112bhp 1.5-litre petrol engine gets an additional shove from an on-board electric motor, which provides an extra 79Nm of torque and 10bhp from only 1,000rpm.

The CR-Z is the first hybrid sold in the UK to get a manual transmission – which highlights its sporting credentials. The steering, brakes and short-throw gearbox are all accurate and sharp, while the lower, stiffer Insight-based chassis makes for an entertaining drive. On paper, the performance isn’t exactly electrifying, but the engaging dynamics deliver a fun factor that’s missing from other hybrids.

An important part of the experience is the hi-tech interior design. There’s a dizzying array of dials and readouts presenting different information about the battery status, economy and which driving mode you’re in – Sport, Normal or Econ.

As well as driving thrills, the Honda offers impressive efficiency. Combined fuel economy of 56.5mpg and CO2 emissions of 117g/km are excellent for a sporty petrol hatchback – and qualify the coupé for first year road tax exemption – although they still fall short of truly green cars such as VW’s Polo BlueMotion. Fuel returns are also likely to take a hit if you use the performance.

Practicality could be better – the sloping roof means the back seats are strictly for kids – and cabin quality is average. However, it remains an appealing and refreshingly different package. This Sport model doesn’t have as many gadgets as the top-spec GT, but it still makes sense. And, most importantly, its fuel efficient, fun-to-drive powertrain proves that hybrids have a place in sports cars.

Rival: VW Scirocco 1.4 TSI The twin-charged VW is pricier at £18,860, but it offers more practicality and a classier cabin. A higher CO2 output of 146g/km and poorer fuel economy than the CR-Z are the price you pay for a little extra performance.

Most Popular

Energy firms want the right to switch off electric cars charging at home
Electric cars

Energy firms want the right to switch off electric cars charging at home

New powers being sought to allow energy providers to turn off high-drain devices to manage electricity network
18 Sep 2020
Audi A3 vs Mercedes A-Class
Car group tests

Audi A3 vs Mercedes A-Class

The Audi A3 and Mercedes A-Class are strong competitors in the premium hatchback market - we find out which is best
19 Sep 2020
New Rolls-Royce Ghost 2020 review
Rolls-Royce Ghost

New Rolls-Royce Ghost 2020 review

The all-new luxury Rolls-Royce Ghost saloon brings new levels of refinement
18 Sep 2020