Skip advert
Advertisement

Compact Execs- A4 vs 3-Series

These saloons blend luxury and driver appeal – but we had a clear winner in the eco stakes

It’s no surprise that the UK’s most economical compact executive car wears a BMW badge. For the past few years, the German firm has set the pace in the segment thanks to its EfficientDynamics hardware. With stop-start technology, low rolling resistance rubber and brake energy regeneration, the brand has managed to offer low emissions and frugal economy without sacrificing driver appeal. And now it has launched the cleanest and greenest 3-Series yet.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The 320d EfficientDynamics delivers combined economy of 68.9mpg and CO2 emissions of 109g/km – impressive for a model with 161bhp. For high-mileage business users, lower fuel bills and company car tax are attractive. Improvements include innovative engine components, longer gearing, lowered suspension and aerodynamic rims with Michelin Energy tyres.

However, BMW’s rivals are catching up. Audi was slow out of the blocks with fuel-saving technology, but in 2.0-litre TDIe trim the cleanest A4 has stop-start, reworked aerodynamics, longer ratios and lowered suspension, plus 61.4mpg combined economy. With 134bhp it lags behind the more costly 320d in performance terms, and it’s left trailing on emissions, too, at 120g/km.

Unfortunately for Audi, the BMW also displayed its economy advantage in our mileage test. The 3-Series lapped the MIRA loop with impressive refinement for 266 miles before it exhausted its 16.3 litres of diesel. In contrast, the Audi achieved only 207.9 miles at an average of 57.9mpg. Compare this to the 74.1mpg achieved by the BMW, and the A4 looks surprisingly thirsty.

The 320d also performed better on our simulated urban route. The stop-start system worked faultlessly from the third junction of the test, and aside from a small amount of judder through the gearlever at restart, its operation was smooth and unobtrusive. With the air-conditioning switched on, the A4’s stop-start didn’t work for the first 50 minutes of the urban drive, so it’s clear the Audi system doesn’t cope with electrical loadings as well as its rival.

And leaving the engine idling at junctions for that length of time will have an effect on fuel consumption over multiple trips.

In addition, the 320d’s powerplant feels smoother than the Audi’s TDI unit. So with the greatest range difference of all the pairings in this test, the BMW is the victor, although its higher price means company users will pay slightly more tax for the privilege.

Skip advert
Advertisement

New & used car deals

Renault Clio

Renault Clio

RRP £16,160Avg. savings £2,721 off RRP*Used from £8,600
Volkswagen Golf

Volkswagen Golf

RRP £24,625Avg. savings £2,261 off RRP*Used from £13,211
Audi A3

Audi A3

RRP £26,295Avg. savings £2,513 off RRP*Used from £5,500
Nissan Juke

Nissan Juke

RRP £19,785Avg. savings £3,331 off RRP*Used from £9,600
* Average savings are calculated daily based on the best dealer prices on Auto Express vs manufacturer RRP
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

New Kia PV5 Passenger MPV undercuts the VW ID.Buzz by a huge £25k
Kia PV5 Passenger - show front

New Kia PV5 Passenger MPV undercuts the VW ID.Buzz by a huge £25k

New entry into the electric people carrier market undercuts the VW ID. Buzz by a significant margin
News
29 Apr 2025
New 2025 Kia PV5 van starts from a tempting £22,645
Kia PV5 Cargo on display at Commercial Vehicle Show - front 3/4

New 2025 Kia PV5 van starts from a tempting £22,645

All-new entry into the van market promises competitive pricing and comes with a range of up to 247 miles
News
30 Apr 2025
New Volkswagen ID.3 Match 2025 review: attractive price boosts EV’s appeal
Volkswagen ID.3 Pure Match - front

New Volkswagen ID.3 Match 2025 review: attractive price boosts EV’s appeal

The value-focused Volkswagen ID.3 Match performs well and is easy to live with
Road tests
28 Apr 2025