Advertisement
In-depth reviews

DS 3 Crossback review - MPG, CO2 and Running Costs

Running costs for the DS 3 Crossback should be good regardless of engine choice

Good economy and cheaper running costs than many rivals are two of the DS 3 Crossback’s redeeming features. The most frugal model is the BlueHDi 100, with official fuel economy figures of 54.4mpg to 62.7mpg depending on spec.

Of the three petrol options it’s the least powerful that’s easiest on fuel: the PureTech 100 manages 46mpg to 52mpg, while the 130 returns 42.2 to 47.1mpg. The most powerful PureTech 155 model is (predictably) the least efficient, with official figures of between 41.7mpg and 46.6mpg.

Advertisement - Article continues below

Best cheap, fuel efficient used cars to buy

It’s a similar story with CO2 emissions too. They sit at 97-102g/km for the diesel, 105-113g/km for the PureTech 100, 109-117g/km for the PureTech 130 and 114-121g/km for the top-spec PureTech 155. All these figures are subject to varying wheel sizes and weight changes depending on which trim level you choose – stay with smaller wheels if economy and efficiency is a primary concern. 

All internal-combustion-powered DS 3 Crossback models will cost £145 per year to tax, after the initial CO2-weighted first year payment that’s usually rolled into the on-the-road price. You can go as mad as you like with options and personalisation without fear of hitting the £40,000-plus surcharge, however. Prices top out just shy of £36,000 for a kitted-out La Premiere model.

Insurance groups

The DS 3 Crossback occupies insurance groups 14 to 24; the lower end of that spectrum accounts for PureTech 100 models, with premiums increasing with engine power and pricier trims. For comparison, the Audi Q2 begins one group below and tops out (sporty SQ2 notwithstanding) in group 27 for a 40 TFSI petrol model. 

Depreciation

Despite its left-field appeal, the DS 3 Crossback is likely to hold on to around 40 to 49 per cent of its value after three years and 36,000 miles come trade-in time, according to our experts. This compares favorably with rivals like the Lexus UX (46 to 53 per cent) and Mazda CX-3 (43 to 51 per cent).

Advertisement
Advertisement

Most Popular

New Skoda Octavia vRS 2020 ride review
Skoda Octavia vRS Hatchback

New Skoda Octavia vRS 2020 ride review

We get our first taste of 242bhp Skoda Octavia vRS with Skoda tech development boss Christian Strube in the driver’s seat
10 Jul 2020
SEAT Leon vs Volkswagen Golf vs Ford Focus
Family hatchbacks

SEAT Leon vs Volkswagen Golf vs Ford Focus

The Ford Focus, Volkswagen Golf and SEAT Leon are all long established hatchbacks - we find out which is best among the latest crop
11 Jul 2020
New Kia e-Niro 2020 review
Kia e-Niro SUV

New Kia e-Niro 2020 review

All-electric Kia e-Niro mid-sized SUV 
benefits from same updates as hybrid Niro versions
9 Jul 2020