Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio long-term test: full of soul but hard to justify

Verdict

It’s fair to say that I have mixed feelings as I say farewell to the Giulia. There’s no doubt that it’s a great car, but it’s not quite great enough for 80 grand, even though it kills a piece of me to write that.

• Mileage: 17,033
• Efficiency: 22.2mpg

In total, I did 5,285 miles and spent 192 days with the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, during which time I realised many new things about it. But my main thought now it’s gone is that it was a great car, yes, but one that could, and should, be better still considering how much money it costs.

Where it’s good, it’s great. But where it’s not so good, it’s unusually poor – and sometimes peculiarly irritating. Some will say it was ever thus with Alfa Romeos, but in 2025 there’s a lot less room for mistakes, and at nigh-on 80 grand, Alfa’s BMW M3 rival needs to be nothing less than brilliant to justify its price.

29

Either way, in order to truly get along with the Quadrifoglio – and despite Alfa having improved it in all sorts of welcome ways for this final version – you still need to see this car through rose-tinted spectacles if you’re not going to be driven mad by it. Otherwise its faults will dominate and the good stuff will fade into the background, which would be very wrong indeed.

Used - available now

2024 Audi

Q2

18,334 milesManualPetrol1.0L

Cash £18,597

View Q2

2025 Volkswagen

Touran

58,459 milesAutomaticPetrol1.5L

Cash £18,297

View Touran

2023 Polestar

2

67,735 milesAutomaticElectric

Cash £17,097

View 2

2023 Tesla

Model 3

50,660 milesAutomaticElectric

Cash £16,800

View Model 3

The elements I loved about it were, in no particular order: the way it looks, the way it sounds and goes under full throttle in Race mode, the way it steers and stops in any mode, the clarity of its new digitised instruments, the way it makes you feel when you first climb inside, the way it smells, the amount you can squeeze into its 525-litre boot, the design and colour of its 19-inch wheels, the lowness of its driving position, and the touch and precision of its enormous metal paddle shifters.

Most of all, perhaps, I loved the warmth of response from other road users. Even people who don’t like cars seem to gravitate towards the Quadrifoglio and want to know what it’s like to drive, which is a rare and welcome quality in a car with 513bhp in 2025.

On the flip side, there was also lots I didn’t get on with. Such as its crazy fuel consumption (15-22mpg depending how hard I drove it), the suspension’s lack of body control in anything other than Race or Sport modes, the fact that you can’t select Race mode without also turning the traction and ESP systems fully off, and the strange absence of refinement to its throttle response in Sport mode.

Then there’s the way its driver’s seat tries to crush the feet of backseat passengers when you switch the engine off (at that point, the seat slides back, and then moves back into the set position when you start the engine – although this can be switched off if you look hard enough within the Comfort set-up menu). The shortage of legroom in general in the rear seats, and – most of all in day-to-day use – the way its DAB radio would drop its signal so frequently on cross-country trips, is inexcusable in 2025.

29

In the end, although I relished my time with the Quadrifoglio – and loved driving it most days purely for the heck of it – I came away frustrated, even though eventually I adapted my ways to fit its and we got along just fine.

The crunch came when someone I’ve known for a long time asked me straight which one I’d recommend he should actually buy: a one-year-old BMW M3 or a similar-age Giulia Quadrifoglio, but still a 2024 MY example. My reply was predictable but logical, and it was not the Alfa, which kind of says it all really. When a genuine buying decision needs to be made, the M3 still wins hands down, even if your heart aches on realising this. In the end, nothing much has changed. 

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: third fleetwatch

29

Rear access and comfort in the back leaves much to be desired

There are many things I like – and love – about the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, but being a rear-seat passenger isn’t one of them.

For parents, in-laws and anyone else in the back, the Giulia isn’t much fun. Entry and exit are the main problems, but there’s also a shortage of foot space. Which is a shame because the chairs are brilliantly supportive – for some. Kids love them, grown-ups don’t, especially if they’re tall. 

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: second fleetwatch

29

Our Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio is proving to be more spacious than we imagined

Who needs an estate car if you have a Misano blue Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio? Answer: not me. In the past month I’ve managed to transport a set of 19-inch Volkswagen Golf R wheels and two sets of tyres in the Alfa. Admittedly this required careful use of the rear seats as well as the boot, but they all squeezed in. The car has also been used to carry two cats to the vet for their annual 10,000-mile service. They hated it.

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: second report

29

We play around with tyre pressures and drive modes, and fall in love with our Alfa all over again

• Mileage: 13,895
• Efficiency: 22.1mpg

Tyre pressures. In Formula One they mean everything, but for mere road cars, they don’t matter that much, do they?

It depends. In an average family runabout, or a big heavy SUV, you’d be hard pushed to tell the difference between 30 and 40psi. But in a finely honed thoroughbred like the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, tyre pressures are a key ingredient, and they are often all-too-easy to get wrong. As I’ve recently discovered.

The problem is, the Alfa’s handbook recommends pressures that are, I reckon, too high. And having experimented with various different pressures in the last couple of months, I’ve found a setting that I believe makes the car even better to drive than it otherwise would be. If you’re interested, they are 2.5 bar at the front and 2.2 bar at the rear. Or in old money, 36psi front, 32psi rear.

Both are a touch lower than the figures Alfa Romeo itself recommends, even with two passengers on board, let alone four. But if you have a Giulia QF, trust me – or at least try these pressures and see how it feels. The ride quality alone is transformed.

I’ve also spent lots of time recently trying to pin down the best combination of settings within the car’s multiple dynamic menus.  In Mode A, the car feels too soft and squidgy, and not very quick, because the throttle map kills the torque flow. Yet in Race Mode the ride becomes way too stiff for UK roads. In D and N Modes I don’t especially like the throttle response, either.

As a result, unless I’m on a motorway, I now drive the Giulia in Race mode, which gives the best drivetrain responses, but with the dampers knocked back to Sport – or D Mode – which sharpens up the body control without going full skateboard. It also puts the steering and gearbox in the best settings for me.

Now I’ve stopped tinkering and have alighted upon a combination I like, the Alfa and I have been getting along really rather well. I now love it to bits, if I’m honest. Not just the way it looks, sounds and goes, but also 
– at last – in the way it drives. It’s wonderful.

On the right road, in the right set-up, it really is a special kind of car. One that makes your heart beat faster and, just occasionally, goads you into behaving like the demented enthusiast it deserves to be driven by. It is a magnificent machine to climb into and drive for the sake of it, in a way that, in my view, no electric car could ever hope to replicate.

On the down side, it burns through fuel at a horrendous rate; my average fuel economy after 2,800 miles is just 22.1mpg. Its CO2 emissions are a bit embarrassing at 229g/km and the infotainment system is nowhere near as good as the equivalents you’ll find in most of the Alfa’s rivals, either – especially those that are made in Germany.

But as you can probably tell, I don’t care. Warts and all (and there are many warts) I’m deeply in love with ‘my’ Alfa Giulia QF. It’s one of the finest sports saloons I’ve ever had the pleasure of driving over a sustained period, and I’m already trying to work out ways of never, ever handing it back.

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: first fleetwatch

29

Damp weather plays havoc with the Alfa’s rear end

During recent greasy road conditions, the rear end has felt quite wayward, even in Eco mode, which pegs the torque output in the name of economy. Trouble is, the dampers become so soft in this mode it makes the back end feel too vague. Yet in Sport or Race mode, the ride becomes firm enough to unsettle the rear tyres at the merest hint of full throttle. So I’m taking it easy and enjoying this car for all sorts of other reasons at the moment.

Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: first report

29

Having just stepped out of an EV, our man is relishing this ICE performance car

• Mileage: 12,519
• Efficiency: 22.7mpg

Car enthusiasts like you and me are spoiled for choice these days, but there’s one question right now that’s hard to answer: do I go EV and join the migration towards a powertrain that will eventually propel most of our cars, or do I stick with a good old-fashioned combustion engine for the time being?

I’m a fan of all good cars, full stop, and in a way I’m not fussed what they’re propelled by so long as they’re quick enough to entertain, sharp enough to excite, practical enough to be usable every day and look good. And to prove this point I’ve just done 6,000 miles in the electric Polestar 2 Performance Pack and, 
with a couple of surprisingly small caveats, enjoyed every minute of it.

But to satisfy my cravings for ‘one last gasp’ in a traditional petrol-engined super-saloon, I’m now going to do the next 6,000 miles in the Polestar’s polar opposite – a thirsty, not-very-clean, but in all other ways really rather delicious Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio. The exact same 2024 model-year Alfa Giulia QV that we’ve already eulogised about in Auto Express and compared with the similarly tasty Hyundai Ioniq 5 N last summer.

So which will I enjoy the more – the smooth, fast, squeaky clean but still deceptively mean Polestar 2 PP or chest-thumping twin-turbo V6 Alfa? It’s a tough job, but having enjoyed the Polestar, I still worried about certain aspects such as its range (max 200 miles in the real world), the price of charging it via the public network and its shocking depreciation. I’m keen to see how life alters with the Alfa – beyond the obvious draws of its 513bhp twin-turbo V6, its recently revised cabin and much-improved rear-wheel-drive chassis.

After just a few weeks with the Alfa, I’m pleased to report that range anxiety is a distant memory: even at 22mpg the Giulia can still do 350 miles between fills, which is a joy I’d forgotten about. And here’s one early shocker; despite its apparent thirst, the Alfa is costing no more to fill than the Polestar did via the public charging network. Living in a city, I had no access to a home charger, which meant I was paying 55-85p per kWh to put 200 miles in the Polestar. The Alfa costs £65-70 for 350-370 miles – so broadly the same as the Polestar for the same mileage.

The flipside is that the Polestar’s tailpipe emissions were zero, whereas the Alfa chugs out a somewhat embarrassing 229g/km – but while it’s still legal, why not? It’s not like there are Alfa QVs on every street corner: these are rare cars, mainly because they cost (gulp) £78,195 before options, but also because they are not everyone’s cup of tea.

However, after just under 1,000 miles, I’m fairly sure the QV is my kind of brew, even though it’s far from flawless. The ride quality is not as good as I hoped it might be, especially not on the lumpy town roads of Brighton and Hove; the DAB radio reception cuts out too often for my liking (more so than in other cars on the same roads); the rear seats are also not as roomy as they could be; and the fuel consumption is genuinely horrendous – worse than I feared it might be, even in eco mode. I’m seeing 23mpg at best and 17mpg at worst.

But when a car looks like this, goes like this, and sounds like this, why sweat over the small stuff? Okay, that’s not entirely rational. But then a car like this is never going to induce rational thoughts or behaviour. Right now I’m loving it to bits – and not missing my previous EV way of life a whole lot either. Not yet...

*Insurance quote from AA (0800 107 0680) for a 42-year-old in Banbury, Oxon, with three points.

Buy a car with Auto Express. Our nationwide dealer network has some fantastic cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing deals to choose from...