Used BMW X3 vs New Honda CR-V
Crossovers: Which rugged family car is a better buy, the BMW X3 or the Honda CR-V?
There aren’t many areas where Honda and BMW’s product ranges overlap, but this new vs used battle is one of them. For the price of the former’s top-spec CR-V auto, you could also buy a used X3 in popular M Sport trim with the company’s fabulous 2.0-litre diesel and eight-speed automatic box.
As with most BMWs, the X3 delivers excellent performance, with 187bhp to play with, an xDrive four-wheel-drive transmission for extra traction in slippery conditions, and a smooth auto gearbox that offers effortless cruising ability.
In addition to all this, because it’s based on the manufacturer’s 3 Series saloon the X3 is also great to drive. You can throw it into bends with surprising aggression and the car clings on. Optional adaptive dampers cut down on body roll in Sport mode, while the chassis clearly telegraphs exactly what’s going on between the tyres and the road.
It’s refined, too. Drop those dampers into Comfort mode and the high-riding SUV settles down to a relaxed cruise, soaking up bumps nicely even on the standard 18-inch M Sport alloys thanks to the long-travel suspension. The four-cylinder turbodiesel is quiet and the cabin comfortable – and with a 550-litre boot, plus a 60:40 split-folding rear seat, there’s plenty of practicality on offer.
However, the Honda is ahead when it comes to usability. A cavernous 589-litre boot means it’ll cope with whatever a family can throw at it, and in EX spec it’s also well equipped. Sat-nav, Bluetooth, DAB, parking sensors, a reversing camera, heated leather seats and cruise control all come as standard.
Car group tests
- Land Rover Discovery Sport vs BMW X3 vs Volvo XC60
- BMW X3 vs Mercedes GLC
- BMW X3 M vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
- New BMW X3 xDrive30e 2020 review
- New BMW iX3 2020 review
- New BMW X3 M 2019 review
- New BMW X3 M40i 2018 review
Used car tests
But BMW’s iDrive multimedia system is much easier to navigate than Honda’s laggy, low-resolution touchscreen, and although there’s plenty of kit, the CR-V’s interior layout and material quality aren’t up to scratch compared to the X3’s slick, leather-lined cabin.
Also, a lot of soft-touch plastics give BMW’s marginally cheaper used SUV more of a premium feel compared to the Honda, while the more tactile surfaces contribute towards its relaxing air.
The CR-V’s nine-speed transmission isn’t quite as slick as BMW’s automatic, either, and the gearshifts aren’t as fast. But they are smooth, and with short ratios it means the downsized 158bhp 1.6-litre pulls harder than its capacity suggests.
It’s still no match for the BMW, though, as the X3’s mix of off-roader looks, a luxurious interior, superior efficiency, practicality and – if you buy used – fair price is a winning combination here.
|Model:||BMW X3 xdrive20d M sport|
|Engine:||2.0-litre 4cyl turbodiesel, 187bhp|
|Model:||Honda CR-V 1.6 i-DTEC EX auto|
|Engine:||1.6-litre 4cyl turbodiesel, 158bhp|
Used vs new
In this review
- 1IntroductionThe ultimate head-to-head test as we see if a used car can live up to its brand new rival
- 2Used Mercedes E-Class vs New Skoda SuperbFamily cars: Spacious, upmarket Mercedes E-Class and Skoda Superb do battle
- 3Used Land Rover Discovery 4 vs New Kia SorentoOff-roaders: Chunky seven-seat Land Rover Discovery 4 and Kia Sorento head off tarmac
- 4Used Porsche Cayman vs New Audi TTSSports cars: Thrilling Porsche Cayman and Audi TTS coupes go head-to-head
- 5Used Ford Fiesta vs New Dacia SanderoSmall cars: Bargain Dacia Sandero supermini faces UK's best-selling Ford Fiesta
- 6Used BMW X3 vs New Honda CR-V - currently readingCrossovers: Which rugged family car is a better buy, the BMW X3 or the Honda CR-V?