Long-term test: Skoda Fabia 130
Second report: Our supermini squares up to its hot-hatch forebear

Verdict
In an attempt to understand the Skoda Fabia 130’s positioning as a warm or hot hatch, the original vRS highlights a lack of character in the newer car. The Fabia 130 is no harder to live with than the standard model, yet it’s noticeably much more fun to drive. It’s an attribute that the first Fabia vRS – along with plenty of other hot Skodas since – possessed in spades.
- Mileage: 2,550 miles
- Efficiency: 43.2mpg
This is the fourth Skoda Fabia we’ve had on the Auto Express test fleet – the first was the Mk1 Fabia vRS, more than 20 years ago. My driving licence, let alone my employment at Auto Express, was still several years away then and as a result I never got to experience the original hot Fabia.
When the Fabia 130 was revealed last year, I remember wondering whether it could be a new vRS in all but name. However, Skoda quickly put the dampeners on my theory; they told me that the Fabia 130 was never meant to be a vRS. Instead, it was a special edition celebrating 130 years of the brand. Despite this, Skoda did say the Fabia 130 “pays tribute to this rich heritage, combining everyday usability with authentic motorsport DNA”.
So, I thought there’s no better way to get a greater sense of that heritage and DNA than finally trying out Skoda UK’s Fabia vRS Mk1, complete with its torquey diesel engine.
Used - available now
2025 Skoda
Fabia
32,602 milesManualPetrol1.0L
Cash £11,5492023 Skoda
Fabia
98,647 milesManualPetrol1.0L
Cash £9,3692023 Skoda
Fabia
12,402 milesAutomaticPetrol1.0L
Cash £14,5052023 Skoda
Fabia
49,202 milesManualPetrol1.0L
Cash £11,100The fact you could buy a diesel-powered hot hatch back then shows how broad the push was for diesel cars in general in the 2000s. And on top of its great fuel economy (although during our original long-term test of the vRS we experienced similar efficiency to what the petrol-engined Fabia 130 is returning now) the Fabia vRS held plenty of appeal.
The 1.9-litre, four-cylinder diesel in the vRS produced 130bhp, way off the 174bhp in the Fabia 130. However, the engine, as we hinted, was all about its torque, which at 310Nm, is 60Nm more than the 130 develops.
The two cars’ engines have a very different character, so while the Mk2 Fabia vRS switched to ‘twin-charged’ (turbo and supercharged) petrol power, you can see why the 130 hasn’t been bestowed with the vRS name.
I said in my first report that I was hoping the Fabia 130 would be more than the sum of its parts and that’s exactly what the original Fabia vRS is. The diesel engine sounds like a van on idle – lumpy and unrefined – and the suspension, while a little lower and stiffer than on the regular model, has an ordinary MacPherson front and torsion-beam rear.
Yet the car is an absolute hoot to drive. Despite its age, I found the vRS genuinely eager on a B-road, with part of its appeal based on its pronounced body roll (that you can just about keep in check) along with accessible surges of old-school torque steer bringing a big, stupid grin to my face.
The example we’re driving is completely as it left the showroom, whereas most versions of the Mk1 Fabia vRS in the UK now pump out black smoke from their chromed exhausts thanks to some fairly extensive and easy-to-achieve remaps. We actually did this to our own Fabia vRS back in 2005 and upped its output to 160bhp and 383Nm of torque.
Might we see owners take their Fabia 130 to engine-tuning specialists to extract more power from that already fettled unit in the same way we did many years ago? Probably not, because unlike the vRS where the main USP is its engine, the joy of the 130’s drive lies more in its balance of comfort and handling. It’s perhaps no surprise to hear the Fabia 130 is a much more precise and composed offering than its hot predecessor.
Should you feel the need to test the limits of the Fabia 130’s grip in the bends, you’ll find the body movement is manageable thanks to the well weighted and quick steering. Although the Fabia 130 is auto-only, hot Skodas (and Volkswagens for that matter) have never had the slickest manual gearshift, so it’s not a huge shame one isn’t available here – but we’d still like to have the option. Less so than the old vRS, the 130 also has a tendency to bob around if you’re really gunning it into a bend – but again everything happens in a predictable manner.
Is the Fabia 130 perhaps too sedate? Volkswagen’s axing of the Polo GTI recently opened a space within the VW Group stable for a hot hatch to sit below the likes of the Golf GTI and Cupra Leon. Sadly the Fabia 130 isn’t that car, though it certainly shows potential. The best compliment I can pay the car is that I would have loved to see more Skodas gain a mildly sportier 130 variant last year.
Skoda Fabia 130: first fleetwatch report
The Skoda Fabia 130 is proving to be an understated and practical companion
This summer, a bunch of Skoda Superb Estates will be used as support vehicles for the Tour de France, and while I can’t endorse a supermini for the same job, our Fabia 130 has been able to accommodate mine and my partner’s bikes. I’ve also come to appreciate how understated the Fabia 130 is, because we can leave it in countryside car parks without it getting much unwanted attention.
Skoda Fabia 130: first report
Our man takes a seat to ponder the fastest Skoda Fabia to date
- Mileage: 1,300 miles
- Efficiency: 42.3mpg
You can tell a lot about a car from its driver’s seat. I’m not talking about cigarette burns or flakes from a pastry, but its design and the way it feels.
Sitting down in the new Skoda Fabia 130’s seat, which has a decent amount of bolstering and bespoke colouring, there’s a sense that it hugs you without feeling uncompromising. With more than 1,300 miles to cover this month over a mix of long journeys and the odd B-road blast, I knew that finding that balance between comfort and support was absolutely key from the outset.
The seats – the front ones at least – set the tone for the Fabia 130. Yet when I realised they were the same as in the lesser Monte Carlo models in not just the Fabia range, but the Scala and Kamiq, too, I felt a little disappointed. The 130 does have some unique cosmetic touches though: there’s fake carbon-fibre detailing on the dashboard and some red trim, but less than in the Monte Carlo, which also gets a Monte Carlo badge on the steering wheel; it’s blank on the Fabia 130.
The 130’s exterior tweaks are pretty subtle, including a small gloss-black splitter, a rear wing and new back bumper trim, along with black decals between the rear lights, twin exhaust tips and a couple of 130 decals. The grey 18-inch alloys that contrast with the red brake calipers certainly fill out the wheelarches nicely, but again, it’s a shame that the Monte Carlo can be had with these rims, too.
The 130 is currently the sportiest Fabia. Skoda didn’t bring back the vRS badge to its supermini, but that’s not to say there aren’t performance-related modifications. The 130’s stance is improved by its 15mm lower ‘sport’ suspension, which has been specifically tuned for a new steering calibration and the model’s standard-fit larger wheels.
The ride is still on the soft side, which I’ve appreciated on frequent long jaunts from my home in Lincolnshire to Heathrow and back. But the larger rims don’t result in a brittleness over rough roads, which is impressive. The flip side is noticeable body roll when you’re pushing on; the car telegraphs what it’s going to do with a decent amount of communication through the wheel, but those looking for vRS levels of poise might be a little disappointed.
When our spy photographers first caught the Fabia 130 testing on the Nürburgring in late summer 2025, our minds were whirring as to what could power this sporty new Skoda hatchback. The turbocharged 2.0-litre EA888 engine from Volkswagen Polo GTI (detuned from the version in the Golf GTI) seemed like a good bet, given that the Polo and Fabia sit on the same MQB A0 platform.
What we didn’t expect was Skoda tuning the EA211 1.5-litre unit from the standard Fabia. Among the bespoke parts are hardened rocker arm pins, new air pipes and a more heat-resistant intake manifold, plus heat-resistant plastics, a chunkier vibration damper and changes to the engine’s ECU to provide additional boost from the variable-turbine-geometry turbocharger.
It sounds pretty involved, but the result is a mere 174bhp rather than the standard engine’s 148bhp. The torque output is the same, at 250Nm, for a 0-62mph time of 7.4 seconds – 0.6 quicker than the next-fastest Fabia. On paper at least, the pay-off for what must have been some costly development work seems to be minimal.
The Fabia 130 has a seven-speed DSG auto gearbox, which is excellent in its own right and gets bespoke mapping for quicker shifts, but it’s a shame there’s no manual option.
We’ll delve more deeply into how the Fabia 130 drives in the coming months, but at first glance the Skoda appears to be a mildly sportier version of the marque’s humble supermini, rather than what I was hoping for: something more than the sum of its parts.
| Model: | Skoda Fabia 130 |
| On fleet since: | March 2026 |
| Price new: | £30,010 |
| Engine: | 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder |
| Power/torque: | 174bhp/250Nm |
| CO2/tax: | 126g/km/31% |
| Options: | Charging Package (£360), Winter Premium Package (£560) |
| Insurance*: | Group: 22 Quote: £1,102 |
| Mileage/mpg: | 1,300/42.3mpg |
| Any problems? | Flat tyre/flat battery |
*Insurance quote for a 42-year-old in Banbury, Oxon, with three points.
Buy a car with Auto Express. Our nationwide dealer network has some fantastic cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing car deals to choose from...













