Skip advert
Advertisement

New Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo 2017 review

Porsche’s sleek Panamera Sport Turismo estate gets boosted plug-in performance, with 671bhp and 850Nm

Find your Porsche Panamera
Compare deals from trusted partners on this car and previous models.
Or are you looking to sell your car?
Value my car
Fast, no-nonsense car selling
Value my car

As a technical exercise it’s impossible not to be impressed by Porsche’s hybrid integration with its new range-topping Sport Turismo. There’s ridiculous pace and huge agility, while its low emissions will please the tax man, too. However, the V6-powered Panamera 4 S E-Hybrid does the latter without the Turbo S E-Hybrid’s massive price, while the petrol-only Turbo is the better outright sporting choice.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The Turbo S badge is one reserved for the fastest, maddest models in Porsche’s line-up, and it’s just been tacked onto the hatchback door of the new Panamera Sport Turismo.

By doing so, Porsche has upped the power from the 4.0-litre twin turbo V8 that powers the standard Turbo, adding a parallel hybrid powertrain. This has not only created the most powerful Panamera ever, with a faintly ludicrous 671bhp, but the one with the longest name.

Best sports cars 2017

Officially, the car you see here is called the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo, but it’d be an impressive feat to place that on shapely backside of the Sport Turismo estate. It’s just the Panamera Turbo S there, the acid green outline highlighting to those in the know that Porsche’s highest performance Panamera is also electrically-charged.

The company isn’t afraid to admit that this car’s hybrid module is all about performance. Yes, there are some efficiency benefits of popping a 136bhp, 400Nm electric motor between the 4.0-litre V8 and the eight-speed PDK automatic transmission, but really, it’s all about the combined output. The lofty numbers are enough for Porsche to lay claim to the title of the world’s most powerful estate car – the fact it’ll drive up to 30 miles on battery power alone is merely a conscience-salving bonus.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement - Article continues below

Used - available now

DS 7 CROSSBACK E-TENSE

2021 DS

DS 7 CROSSBACK E-TENSE

37,660 milesAutomaticPetrol1.6L

Cash £15,999
View DS 7 CROSSBACK E-TENSE
C-HR

2022 Toyota

C-HR

17,515 milesAutomaticPetrol1.8L

Cash £17,547
View C-HR
Corsa

2019 Vauxhall

Corsa

14,330 milesManualPetrol1.4L

Cash £9,963
View Corsa
Model 3

2023 Tesla

Model 3

22,496 milesAutomaticElectric

Cash £21,400
View Model 3

There’s a trade-off with all the hybrid technology, however. The Turbo S E-Hybrid loses 95 litres of bootspace over a conventional Sport Turismo, while also adding a 215kg weight penalty.

In spite of its ample bulk, the numbers associated with it are certainly deserving of that Turbo S status. With four-wheel drive, all that additional power and torque and wider rear tyres, it’ll reach 62mph in 3.4 seconds – two tenths of a second quicker than a Sport Chrono-equipped Turbo. Keep the accelerator pushed hard to the floor and it’ll double that in 11.9 seconds – on to a slightly higher 192mph top speed, too.

The weight does little to blunt the Turbo S’s agility, thanks in no small part to Porsche’s specification of almost every available chassis system as standard. There is adaptive, three-chamber air suspension with Porsche Active Suspension Management, Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control Sport and Porsche Torque Vectoring Plus, as well as Porsche Ceramic Composite Brakes.

All that wizardry is managed by Porsche’s 4D Chassis Control. Indeed, the only option you can add to the already lengthy list of agility-enhancing acronyms is rear axle steering. It’s inconceivable that any buyers at this price point won’t do so, as it does wonders in shrinking the Panamera’s size, markedly improving the turn-in response. The steering itself offers fine weight, if not masses of feel, and the suspension rides with a suppleness that’s limo-like in its Comfort setting and taut and controlled in its more sporting choices. Only the odd ridge upsets the air suspension’s composure.

Advertisement - Article continues below
Skip advert
Advertisement
Skip advert
Advertisement - Article continues below

The standard ceramic PCCB brakes do a great job of hauling back all that mass, even if the pedal feel isn’t quite as incisive as its non-hybrid relations.

Best estate cars 2017

There’s active aerodynamics to help should you chance upon a high speed run on the autobahn. Here, the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid Sport Turismo accelerates with seemingly endless urge. That’s facilitated by the huge 850Nm of torque – produced in a flat line from 1,400rpm to 5,600rpm. It is that which defines the performance.

The elasticity of response from that hugely powerful hybrid powertrain brings always-available pace, in fact. With that comes some unusual, and not necessarily entirely welcome traits, however, at least when applied to the Turbo S badge here.

There’s plentiful force but little actual drama. The ordinary Panamera Turbo does acceleration that’s vivid, brutal and backed with a rousing, often unruly soundtrack. The sound made by a Mercedes-AMG E 63 estate or Audi RS6 will leave you tingling in comparison, too. They’re more practical, as well.  

Yes, the Turbo S E-Hybrid has the ability to readjust your internals in Sport or Sport+ modes with its acceleration and cornering ability, but it loses the visceral edge of its conventionally-powered relation and rocketship rivals. The force it generates is more linear, yet less unhinged despite the numbers associated with it.

It’ll bend time, but it does so in an almost apologetic, muted fashion, with the hybrid system civilising its performance, crazy as that might sound.

The actual advantages it brings then are arguably negated. A similarly-equipped Turbo will be just as quick in the real world, needs less management of its powertrain and, thanks to the reduced bulk, make more from the chassis. With the Turbo S the huge specification feels like it’s there to compensate rather than to enhance, which is somewhat at odds with the expectation of the badge it wears.

For those interested in running costs, and bizarrely, many will be – the Turbo S E-Hybrid emits just 69g/km of CO2, while allegedly returning almost 100mpg. You’ll need a relatively short commute and regular access to a charge point to realise those numbers, but company bosses looking to minimise their tax bills will be pleased to see it sits in the same (13 per cent) bracket as a Toyota Prius.

Skip advert
Advertisement

New & used car deals

Toyota Yaris Cross

Toyota Yaris Cross

RRP £27,145Avg. savings £2,383 off RRP*Used from £15,483
Hyundai Tucson

Hyundai Tucson

RRP £29,820Avg. savings £5,344 off RRP*Used from £10,195
MG MG4

MG MG4

RRP £27,005Avg. savings £10,288 off RRP*Used from £10,200
Skoda Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

RRP £39,025Avg. savings £3,224 off RRP*Used from £13,495
* Average savings are calculated daily based on the best dealer prices on Auto Express vs manufacturer RRP
Skip advert
Advertisement

Most Popular

What do car journalists drive? The cars our experts spent their own cash on
Auto Express team members standing with their own cars

What do car journalists drive? The cars our experts spent their own cash on

The Auto Express content team is fortunate enough to drive many cars on a regular basis. But that knowledge sometimes translates into unusual private …
Features
29 Dec 2025
New Skoda Fabia 130 2026 review: a likeable warm hatch, but it’s no vRS
Skoda Fabia 130 - front tracking

New Skoda Fabia 130 2026 review: a likeable warm hatch, but it’s no vRS

The new 130 is the hottest Fabia we’ve seen in a while, but it’s also one of the most expensive
Road tests
29 Dec 2025
Jaguar will prove the naysayers wrong by building a monolith of design and taste
Jaguar design - opinion, header image

Jaguar will prove the naysayers wrong by building a monolith of design and taste

Jordan Katsianis thinks the criticism of Jaguar’s bold new approach is misplaced. If anything, it isn’t bold enough.
Opinion
29 Dec 2025