Long-term test: Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Third report: We compare our high-performance SUV to a couple of super-fast estates
Verdict
Our Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio still is charming, but two fast estates exposed some of its dynamic compromises – even if they couldn’t match its versatility and usability. So, is SUV or estate the better family-friendly sports car? It comes down to personal preference, but all will make you smile.
- Mileage: 12,584 miles
- Efficiency: 22.6mpg
It’s been a month of heavy use for our Stelvio, and I am happy its efficiency is creeping up thanks to some longer drives. The number is still quite frightening at 22.6mpg, but meagre progress is still progress, I guess.
However, some long-distance trips also confirmed that our Alfa isn’t a great cruiser. While it feels agile and responsive in corners, it never quite settles down enough to avoid feeling edgy or nervous on the motorway.
Thankfully, the steering weight does increase with speed, especially in Dynamic mode, which helps to calm this feeling. Do that, though, and you’ll have to knock the transmission into manual and lock it into the highest gear, because in ‘auto’ the gearbox will drop down a ratio or two far too eagerly. The dampers will also need to be put back into their softer mode via a button on top of the drive mode selector. But you know what? All this fiddling doesn’t faze me one little bit.
Used - available now
2023 Hyundai
Tucson
20,894 milesAutomaticPetrol1.6L
Cash £19,000
2024 Peugeot
408
10,024 milesAutomaticPetrol1.2L
Cash £18,449
2026 BMW
3 Series
32,025 milesAutomaticPetrol2.0L
Cash £22,049
2023 Ford
Puma
22,509 milesAutomaticPetrol1.0L
Cash £15,599Like a high-end Italian coffee machine that needs fettling to produce its best results, it gives me great pleasure to twist the rotary drive-mode selector, flick the aluminium paddles and press a few buttons to make the Alfa work just that bit better. However, while doing all this does make motorways more bearable, you still can tell the Alfa would much prefer to be driven hard than cruise.
Among my long trips this month was to one of our bases in Bedfordshire, where we were conducting a twin test between two of Germany’s best high-performance estates: the BMW M3 Touring and Audi’s new RS 5 Avant. It was impossible not to draw a comparisons with our Alfa; after all, they all cost largely the same amount, have similar levels of performance and appeal to the same sort of customer.
So – and this is a question all motoring journalists love to ask – do you really need an SUV if you want the ultimate fast family car?
Well, while the Alfa is brilliant to drive, you can sometimes feel the suspension getting a little flustered over particularly complex surfaces. The BMW, on the other hand, has even more composure, more control and more performance; it’s a stunning example of the capability the M division has engineered into its current M3. The Audi, meanwhile, pairs an exceptional chassis with a more flexible powertrain. It’s also more cost-effective, both in terms of fuel efficiency and tax.
There are still places where the Alfa shines a little brighter. It’s more versatile, with parents in particular likely to appreciate the higher seats that make it easier to get kids in the back. A bigger boot is welcome, too. Then there’s the question of image; strangely, it’s actually the lurid green Italian SUV that has a more understated appearance beside the brutal, almost caricature-like Germans.
So, if this is purely a comparison of driving dynamics, our Alfa falls just short. But it’s not so clear-cut if you need the extra space an SUV such as this grants you. The nail in that particular coffin for the German pair is that none of BMW, Audi, Porsche or Mercedes-AMG currently sells a direct ultra-high-performance petrol SUV rival to the Stelvio.
But, what about when you consider high-performance electric SUVs? How does our Alfa fare when compared with them? This is something we’ll look into in my next report. With petrol at nearly £1.80 a litre, they’re becoming an increasingly tempting option.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio: second fleetwatch report
The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has plenty going for it, but its slow infotainment system undermines its appeal
There’s lots to like about our Alfa Romeo Stelvio, but one aspect that will never not be annoying is the truly awful infotainment system. I can just about put up with the small screen and its poor resolution, but it is so painfully slow to react – whether I’m prodding the screen itself or using the click-wheel – that every interaction drives me completely mad.
Flick down from the top of the screen and a customisable bar of shortcuts will eventually reveal itself. This is where you can disable the speed-limit alert system, meaning at least one essential daily task is relatively easy to complete. But for anything else it’s a truly horrible experience, and totally undermines the premium nature of the Stelvio and its punchy near-£100k price tag.
There are some workarounds; Apple CarPlay means you don’t often have to actually use Alfa’s ancient user interface, and physical air-con controls mean there’s no need to use the screen for them either. But if a legacy brand such as Alfa wants to reinforce its technical superiority against newer rivals, it simply has to wake up and move on from an out-of-date infotainment system like this one.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio: second report
Sporty SUV is certainly no city slicker, but it’s an absolute driver’s delight once you’re on the open road
- Mileage: 11,780 miles
- Efficiency: 21.7mpg
I’m now a few months into Quadrifoglio life, and I have to admit the guilt meter is twitching. My central London base means I rarely use a car for errands or that sort of thing day-to-day, but the reality of driving a high-performance petrol-powered SUV in and out of the city still means there’s a lot of time spent in traffic idling away. Alfa has fitted a stop-start system, but it seems to be about as active as an Italian post office in mid-August.
It’s not just emissions guilt, either, but it has resulted in some fairly appalling fuel economy returns in the last few months, with the Stelvio falling to just 21.7mpg. The last time I drove a car with figures like that, it had a Lamborghini badge on it.
It’s not particularly happy at these speeds, either. The brakes have an odd propensity to hold a little after you press the throttle pedal, releasing the car with a jolt, which can’t possibly be helping economy. Frankly, for the sort of driving that I do most of the time, having such an engine just doesn’t make sense, because it consumes premium unleaded – which is particularly expensive right now, as I’m sure you have noticed – at an alarming rate.
But when you’re on the right road and in the right mood, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio is almost impossible not to fall for. And this is down to the quality of engineering that went into the model, and its Giulia cousin, some years back. It’s a story I love hearing, but these cars were in effect created in the night by a crack team of engineers and designers from deep inside Alfa Romeo, rather than as part of a group project with input from other brands. And indisputably, they’re all the better for it.
In being off-book, the team had more freedom to execute exactly the model it wanted, and by extension the dynamically capable car Alfa Romeo needed at the time. This unerring focus is obvious in almost every aspect of the driving experience, and while there are plenty of individual elements that could have been developed further, each was the result of passion, not endless compromise.
Drive the Quadrifoglio down a challenging, bumpy back road and there’s grip, power and superb body control. But the Stelvio isn’t about numbers; instead, it’s the feel that’s important. The SUV stance sits you a little higher than would be considered ideal, but the chassis is wonderfully balanced, so you turn into bends with supreme confidence and accelerate out as if this was a focused sports car.
This level of dynamic alacrity doesn’t come from a committee of accountants and product planners following endless rounds of meetings, but passionate engineers with real skin in the game. These are people who are driven by a love for cars and the badges they wear, which is certainly the case with the Stelvio Quadrifoglio. When we speak about legacy in the automotive world, it’s about the knowledge and history that underpin it – and this car is a representation of what is great about Alfa Romeo.
Could a Tesla Model Y Performance outperform the Stelvio by every on-paper performance metric? Without doubt. Is it more efficient, clever, connected, practical than the Quadrifoglio? Yep, afraid so. Do I yearn to own a Tesla? Not a chance.
This sentiment was put into specific context recently, because the past month has delivered some wonderful driving experiences in the Stelvio. Most recently, it acted as a photography car and support vehicle for a photoshoot that included the rare and rather ridiculous-looking Giulia Quadrifoglio Luna Rossa, proving once again that it can elevate mundane tasks into something special and that passion needn’t come at the expense of practicality.
Granted, this car makes absolutely no logical sense, and in many ways life with the Quadrifoglio is sometimes a bit of a pain. But I challenge anyone to try to take the Alfa Romeo away from me prematurely, because I simply won’t allow that to happen.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio: first fleetwatch report
A wedding gave the Stelvio the chance to show off its practical side, and it handled the task with ease
In an unusual twist of fate for long-term test cars in my possession, our resplendent green Stelvio was pressed into action as a versatile SUV this month. It’s hardly been suffering the trials of child-ferrying or camping holidays, though. Shifting a bootful of flowers, decorations and some outdoor chairs for a wedding (not mine) is about as hardcore as my practicality needs get.
And the car did a brilliant job. The Stelvio is something of a middle-ranker in terms of size, so while it’s not quite as commodious as the BMW iX3 we’ve recently welcomed onto the fleet, it was plenty for my requirements. The rear seats fold nearly flat, although this is the first car I’ve come across to feature a lever for the folding mechanism mounted on the seat base by the rear footwell. In any case, I’ve been impressed with how easy it is to switch into van mode, without the Alfa feeling too big or cumbersome in the city.
Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio: first report
Hot SUV joins our fleet as we explore the importance of legacy in a fast-changing car world
- Mileage: 9,450 miles
- Efficiency: 24.5mpg
You could be forgiven for asking why we are running an ostensibly old Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio as a new fleet car. It’s been on sale for nearly eight years, and while there were some recent updates – such as more power, improved tech, and better headlights – there is a much broader reason for featuring this car: to find out how important legacy is in our new fast-food world of cars.
The last three long-term test cars I’ve run have been from ‘new-age’ manufacturers: Tesla, Polestar and most recently BYD. And the experience got me wondering about the part that history plays in choosing a new car.
To answer this we’ve turned to Alfa Romeo, a brand whose story stretches back 115 years (it turns 116 on 24 June). And for a bit of context, China was still ‘Imperial China’ when Alfa was incorporated in Turin.
While the form of this ‘legacy’ car – a high-performance SUV – is on the contemporary side, it’s also the purest Alfa Romeo product in the brand’s current line-up. The chassis, engine, interior, tech interfaces and more, were all designed and developed in-house by a small skunkworks team, even though Alfa is part of a much larger conglomerate.
The Stelvio might be a relatively old design, but its technical spec is still compelling. It has been developed on a lightweight saloon-car platform with the engine mounted mostly behind the front axle for improved weight distribution. That unit is a 513bhp 2.9-litre twin-turbo V6 petrol engine that’s connected to an eight-speed automatic transmission sending that power to all four wheels, although with an obvious rear-drive bias.
It’s also a very light car for its type, at 1,830kg. For comparison, a Mercedes-AMG GLC 53 is more than 300kg heavier, and if you consider electric rivals, the Porsche Macan Turbo weighs almost 600kg more.
The cabin is often where cars can feel their age, and that is certainly true here. While I love the steering wheel and the paddles behind it, the simplicity of the air-con controls and the drive-mode switch, the main digital interface – which felt a little behind the curve in 2018 – is pretty poor. Its resolution is low, it’s slow to react and the rear camera view looks like someone’s smeared Vaseline on the lens. At least the system includes Apple CarPlay, but it’s only able to be connected via a wire.
A nice contrast to this is the high-res screen behind the wheel that replaces the physical dials. It was introduced in 2024, and although it’s not particularly configurable, its vintage instrument set looks great. You can even set up three extra ‘performance dials’ to re-create the iconic five-dial layout that defined Alfa Romeo cabins for decades. Legacy, it seems, is already seeping its way into the experience.
This isn’t a cheap car, though. Its basic price is £96,090, and although our car only has three options, it still costs £102,040. But mid-size SUVs in their high-performance form cost that much these days. A Macan Turbo Electric costs from £97,565, for example. There’s another question to consider, too. I live in London and for almost five years, I’ve been almost exclusively driving EVs day-to-day. So is switching back to a petrol car a good idea?
Will I relish not needing to search out public charging points? Will sitting in traffic in a gas- guzzling high-performance SUV get the guilt-meter twitching? And what role does legacy really play? I’ve got six months to find out.
| Rating: | 4.0 stars |
| Model: | Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio |
| On fleet since: | April 2026 |
| Price new: | £96,090 |
| Powertrain: | 2.9-litre V6, twin-turbo petrol |
| Power/torque: | 513bhp/600Nm |
| CO2/tax: | 267g/km/£640 |
| Options: | Special Montreal Green paint (£2,000), Akrapovic exhaust (£3,000), Red calipers (£450) |
| Insurance*: | Group: 47 Quote: £2,083 |
| Mileage/mpg: | 12,584/22.6mpg |
| Any problems? | Squeaky brakes |
*Insurance quote from AA (0800 107 0680) for a 42-year-old in Banbury, Oxon, with three points.
Buy a car with Auto Express. Our nationwide dealer network has some fantastic cars on offer right now with new, used and leasing car deals to choose from...
