Old vs new: Jaguar XJ40 vs Jaguar I-Pace
The I-Pace favours glossy cabin materials to the XJ’s traditional wood, and instruments and switchgear show how things have moved on
If you wanted a luxury Jaguar back in 1988, your choice was the XJ40. While the XJ still exists in 2018, there’s an alternative that clearly shows how timesare changing, because your options now also include the all-electric I-Pace SUV.
This is possibly the starkest contrast of the cars we’ve lined up here and shows how in only three decades the motor industry has entered a significant new era.
Back in the eighties the XJ40 was an all-new advanced design that moved the game on in the luxury car segment. It might have taken its 221bhp 3.6-litre straight-six petrol engine from the XJ-S, but the saloon’s independent rear suspension and the advanced electronic instruments were forward-thinking and meant it was every bit as appealing as its German rivals.
The car in our pictures is a Daimler XJ40. That badge represented Jag’s highest trim level, in effect, and climbing inside, you can see just why it wore that accolade so well. Your smartphone might have more computing capability than the XJ’s digital instrument cluster, but it was a hi-tech treat that set the luxury cabin off in the eighties.
The Daimler’s interior is covered in leather, with soft but supportive seats that, along with the smooth but comically forgiving suspension by modern standards, cushion you from blows delivered by the road.
Car group tests
- Abarth Punto vs Corsa SRi
- Jaguar XE 300 Sport vs Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio vs Jaguar F-Pace
- Alpina XD3 Biturbo vs Porsche Macan S Diesel
- BMW M2 CS vs Porsche 718 Cayman GTS vs Alpine A110 S
- Audi TTS vs Alpine A110 vs Porsche 718 Cayman
- Ariel Nomad
- Audi Q5 vs Volvo XC60 vs Hyundai Santa Fe: 2021 group test review
- BMW 5 Series vs Audi A6 vs Volvo S90
- Aston Martin DBX vs Bentley Bentayga
- BMW 5 Series vs Audi A6 vs Volvo S90
- Abarth 124 Spider review
- Abarth Punto (2008-2015)
- Alfa Romeo Giulia review
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio review
- Alfa Romeo 4C (2014-2019) review
- Citroen Ami: long-term test review
- Cupra Leon TSI 300: long-term test review
- Cupra Formentor V1: long-term test review
- Ford Puma ST-Line: long-term test review
- Honda e: long-term test review
- Land Rover Discovery Sport D180: long-term test review
- Porsche 718 Cayman GTS 4.0: long-term test review
- Renault Clio Iconic: long-term test review
- SEAT Leon e-Hybrid: long-term test review
- SEAT Mii electric: long-term test review
- New AC Cobra 378 Superblower 2021 review
- New AC Cobra 378 review
- New Alfa Romeo Giulia GTAm 2021 review
- New Alpine A110 Legende GT 2021 review
- New Callum Vanquish review
- Aston Martin Rapide S review
- New Audi Q5 Sportback 2021 review
- New Audi e-tron S 2021 review
- New Bentley Bentayga Hybrid 2021 review
- New Bentley Continental GT Speed 2021 review
Used car tests
- Used Alfa Romeo Giulia (Mk1, 2016-date) review
- Used Bentley Bentayga review
- Used Bentley Continental GT review
- Used DS 5 review
- Ferrari 348: Buying guide and review (1989-1994)
- Ferrari F40: Buying guide and review (1987-1992)
- Ferrari Mondial: Buying guide and review (1980-1993)
- Used Fiat 500 review
- Used Fiat 124 Spider review
- Used Honda CR-V (Mk4, 2012-2017) review
Thanks to the chassis set-up, it isn’t all that agile, and with slow steering, you have to twirl the narrow-rimmed wheel to guide the XJ round tighter bends. But then, the brief for a luxury car has changed over the years, so this isn’t a surprise – and there are actually many benefits compared with contemporary luxury limousines.
It can still hustle, though. The four-speed automatic takes a while to compute your throttle input before realising it needs to change down, but once it does that turbine-smooth straight-six shunts you forward on a creamy wave of torque.
It’s also incredibly refined. You get the purr of the motor and a silky six-cylinder sound, but none of the rattles or intrusive percussion of some older cars. It’s just right.
Jag’s J-gate made its debut on the ’40, too, so you can take manual control, although it’s more fitting to settle into a sedate pace and let the XJ do what it does best: cruise serenely in comfort.
You don’t have a choice of which gear to select in the I-Pace, because there’s only one. Its two electric motors deliver 395bhp and will rocket this 2,133kg car from 0-60mph in 4.5 seconds without any changes. It’ll do this in near silence as well, so the I-Pace hasn’t lost any of the XJ40’s refinement.
What’s great is how you can feel this Jaguar bloodline running through even its most modern machine. The majority of electric cars have none of the feedback keen drivers love; they ‘feel’ digital and lack communication. But the I-Pace goes some way to bucking that trend. Its steering feels uncorrupted – weighted just right for the size of the car – and pointy, to capitalise on the technology helping underneath.
It might be high and heavy, but the electric motors vector the brawny 696Nm of torque to boost agility. Traction is great and throttle response is instant, thanks to the way EVs deliver their power.
The ride is composed, too. Despite its significant bulk, roll is controlled well and you can carry plenty of speed into corners.
It’s a driver’s electric car, but EVs are about so much more. Range is a critical factor, and the I-Pace’s 90kWh battery delivers up to 292 miles from a single charge.
Deplete that and it’ll take just 45 minutes for an 80-per-cent rapid charge, which is limited by infrastructure to 50kW, rather than the car, because the I-Pace has 100kW charging capability built in.
Regenerative braking means you can recoup energy that would otherwise be wasted when slowing down, too, topping up the battery for even greater cruising potential. It’s something for nothing when compared with a petrol or diesel car.
Brake pedal feel could still be better, but it’s one of the best-integrated systems out there – a facet that marks the Jaguar SUV out from its electric rivals.
As with the XJ40, there’s quality to match the engineering underneath. The I-Pace’s cabin isn’t bound by the usual constraints of a front-engined, rear-driven car like the XJ, so there’s no transmission tunnel, which means more space inside for passengers and their belongings.
It shows why the I-Pace is our current Car of the Year and how far Jaguar has come in three decades. This sector has changed a lot over that period, but it feels like we’re set for even bigger advances in the future.
|Model:||Jaguar XJ40 3.6 Daimler||Jaguar I-Pace EV400 90kWh AWD First Edition|
|Price when new:||£34,500||£81,495|
|Engine:||3.6-litre straight-six petrol||2x electric motor|
|0-60mph/top speed:||7.4 seconds/135mph||4.5 seconds/124mph|
Jaguar: The future
The I-Pace is a window to an electrified world of Jaguars. This is just the first model of many to come that will either be a pure EV or use an increasingly strong electrified element in its powertrain – and from sports cars to luxury models, the tech is applicable.
Jag has shown its established German rivals how to do it with the I-Pace, so expect the British brand to carry its learning and the momentum gained by it through to other products in the pipeline for the future.
An all-electric F-Type, with instant performance and suitably daring styling like the I-Pace, would rejuvenate the brand’s sports car offering, while a future luxury EV such as an XJ saloon would boost refinement and relaxation to the max.
Click on the links to the left or below to see our old vs new head-to-head tests...
In this review
- 1IntroductionTo celebrate our 30th anniversary we put the star cars we were testing in 1988 up against the class leaders of 2018
- 2MINI Jet Black vs MINI Cooper 5drIgnore the big difference in size, and there’s clear lineage between the Jet Black Mini and current MINI Cooper 5dr
- 3McLaren 12C Spider vs McLaren SennaJust six years separate the 12C Spider and Senna, but the latter shows just how far McLaren has come
- 4Jaguar XJ40 vs Jaguar I-Pace - currently readingThe I-Pace favours glossy cabin materials to the XJ’s traditional wood, and instruments and switchgear show how things have moved on
- 5Ford Fiesta XR2 vs Ford Fiesta STThe Fiesta XR2 was many an enthusiast’s fast Ford of choice back in 1988. 30 years on, the ST has picked up the mantle
- 6Nissan Bluebird vs Nissan QashqaiDespite their very different body styles, the Nissan Bluebird and Qashqai have proven big hits
- 7Best of British - Aston Martin to VauxhallFrom homegrown brands to foreign-owned marques, the UK still builds great cars