Jaguar C-X17 4x4 2014 review
We drive the Jaguar C-X17, a prototype of the Jaguar SUV due on sale in 2015
Seeing the Jaguar C-X17 moving under its own steam really brings to the fore just how striking its design is. The concept may be full of rough edges but the packaging and character of this car is clear to see from behind the wheel. If Jaguar’s design team can deliver on the styling and the engineering team can deliver on this new aluminium-mix architecture then the big three German brands will seriously have to start watching their backs.
We waited forever to see a Jaguar SUV, then finally the Jaguar C-X17 concept arrived at the Frankfurt Motor Show earlier this year. Now, the blue paintwork of that original show car has been ditched in favour of silver, and Jaguar has allowed Auto Express behind the wheel ahead of the production car’s debut late in 2015.
It’s worth remembering that this is a hand-built concept so we’re not expecting the most refined driving experience in the world, but it’s great for showing off how the C-X17 will look. Sitting in the blazing Dubai sunshine it looks every inch a Jaguar, from its large XJ-inspired grille to the muscular rear wheelarches and narrow taillights borrowed from the F-Type.
The design team behind this concept is keen to see it through to production almost unchanged as well; as Julian Thomson, Advanced Design Director revealed: “we’re not in the business of letting customers down, we can’t show this concept and then come out with something that looks nothing like it.”
More reviews
Car group tests
- Abarth Punto vs Corsa SRi
- Mercedes GLA vs Alfa Romeo Tonale 2024 twin test: premium plug-in hybrids go head-to-head
- Alpina XD3 Biturbo vs Porsche Macan S Diesel
- The best long-term car tests 2022
- Ariel Nomad
- Audi S3 vs BMW M135: which German brand builds the hottest hatchback?
- Volkswagen Touareg vs Audi Q8: an SUV sibling rivalry
- Range Rover vs Bentley Bentayga: 2022 twin test review
- BMW 128ti vs Volkswagen Golf GTI: understated hot hatches have plenty of used appeal
- Morgan Plus Four vs BMW Z4: retro-modern roadster battle
In-depth reviews
- Abarth 600e review
- Abarth 124 Spider review
- Abarth Punto (2008-2015)
- Alfa Romeo Tonale review
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio review
Long-term tests
- Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV long-term test: things are looking bright thanks to our stylish SUV
- Alpine A110 GT: long term test
- BYD Dolphin Design long-term test: compact EV is a near-perfect family runaround
- DS 4 E-Tense 225: long-term test review
- Fiat 500: long-term test review
- Genesis GV60 Premium long-term test: wireless Apple CarPlay is a surprising omission
- Genesis Electrified GV70 long-term test: great for a family road trip
- New Honda e:Ny1 Advance long-term test: poor efficiency dents EV’s appeal
- Jaguar F-Pace PHEV: long-term test review
- Jeep Avenger Summit long-term test: a good all-round electric SUV
Road tests
- New AC Cobra 378 Superblower 2021 review
- New AC Cobra 378 review
- New Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2023 review
- New Alfa Romeo Giulia 2023 review
- New Alpina B3 Touring 2023 review
- Alpine A110 R 2024 review: almost the perfect sports car
- New Alpine A110 S 2022 review
- New Alpine A110 Legende GT 2021 review
- New Aston Martin DBX707 2024 review: updated interior transforms Aston’s super-SUV
- New Aston Martin Vantage 2024 review: Britain's answer to the Porsche 911 Turbo
Used car tests
- Used Alpine A110 (2017-date) review
- Used Audi A6 (Mk5, 2018-date) buyer’s guide: classy exec is a great family car
- Used Bentley Continental GT (Mk3, 2018-date) review
- Used BMW Z4 (Mk3, 2019-date) buyer’s guide: a worthy Porsche Boxster rival
- Used Cupra Formentor (Mk1, 2020-date) buyer's guide: stylish and family-friendly
- Used Dacia Sandero (Mk3, 2020-date) review: all the essentials at a low price
- Used Ford Mustang Mach-E (Mk1, 2020-date) buyer's guide: a sporty EV with decent range
- Used Ford Puma (2020-date) review: an impressive SUV that’s great to drive
- Used Honda Jazz (MK4, 2020-date) review: a reliable supermini with plenty of space
- Used Honda e (Mk1, 2020-2024) review: limited range, but a desirable city EV
Step in to the cabin and you start to get a sense of what the C-X17 is about; it’s the four-seat layout and sporty F-Type steering wheel that reveal this isn’t so much an SUV but a dynamic crossover. You sit relatively low down so you feel a little more connected to the action than you do in a Range Rover.
Underneath the bonnet is the 3.0-litre supercharged V6 engine used to great effect in the F-Type but also available detuned in the XJ limo and XF. In the production car it would be bolted in to Jaguar’s new iQ[Al] aluminium architecture – set to underpin all future Jags except the sports cars – but here it’s a mixture of unique parts and XF leftovers.
Without any sound insulation the roar of the V6 is always with you and there’s no polish on the ride or steering but you really get the sense of being cocooned within the C-X17, much like you do in a sports car. That’s no accident, as design and engineering teams have worked together from day one to help create these proportions, including the long bonnet and a shallow glass area.
In terms of what a drive like this can actually teach us about how the C-X17 will drive, there’s actually very little to learn. But it is interesting to talk to the team behind the project and hear how they want the production version to be “the most dynamic, the most efficient and the best-looking” car in its class.
Those are ambitions that Jaguar holds for each one of its future line-up, and with a generous head of steam behind it, you wouldn’t bet against a seriously strong future for Jaguar, bolstered by models like the C-X17.