MG EV Concept first drive review
New EV Concept could provide a much-needed boost for MG, if it gets the right price tag
MG's EV Concept suggests a radical new approach could be on the cards from the SAIC-owned manufacturer, and the early signs are promising. Some might be put off by the underwhelming range if it went on sale today, but there’s a lot to like about the styling and how it feels on the road, providing the price is right.
Not that the reborn British brand is going to rush things: this EV concept doesn’t yet preview a production car. MG is first keen to gauge feedback from its customer base before making a decision, and where better to do it than the marque’s 90th birthday celebration weekend at Silverstone?
Auto Express was given the chance to climb aboard prior to the MG EV's public debut, for a few laps round Silverstone's smaller Stowe circuit. Approaching the four-seat electric city car, we we're greeted by a compact and surprisingly charming design. The interior takes a minimalistic approach that looks futuristic on a budget, aside from the steering wheel, which is borrowed from the MG3. It’s a comfortable place to sit, and four average-sized adults won’t struggle for head or legroom, the only clear trade-off being a miniscule boot.
Car group tests
- Abarth Punto vs Corsa SRi
- Alpina XD3 Biturbo vs Porsche Macan S Diesel
- BMW M2 CS vs Porsche 718 Cayman GTS vs Alpine A110 S
- Audi TTS vs Alpine A110 vs Porsche 718 Cayman
- Ariel Nomad
- Aston Martin DB11 AMR vs Bentley Continental GT
- Audi A8 vs Mercedes S-Class: 2022 twin test review
- Range Rover vs Bentley Bentayga: 2022 twin test review
- Caterham 170R vs Mazda MX-5: 2022 group test review
- Caterham Seven 270 - best sports cars
- Abarth 124 Spider review
- Abarth Punto (2008-2015)
- Alfa Romeo Giulia review
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio review
- Alfa Romeo 4C (2014-2019) review
- Citroen Ami: long-term test review
- Cupra Formentor V1: long-term test review
- Cupra Leon TSI 300: long-term test review
- Dacia Jogger: long-term test review
- DS 7 Crossback E-Tense: long term test review
- Fiat 500: long-term test review
- Ford Puma ST-Line: long-term test review
- Honda e: long-term test review
- Land Rover Defender p400e PHEV: long-term test review
- Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor: long-term test review
- New AC Cobra 378 Superblower 2021 review
- New AC Cobra 378 review
- New Alfa Romeo Tonale 2022 review
- New Alfa Romeo Giulia Estrema 2022 review
- New Alfa Romeo Giulia GTAm 2021 review
- New Alpine A110 S 2022 review
- New Alpine A110 Legende GT 2021 review
- New Aston Martin V12 Vantage 2022 review
- New Aston Martin Vantage F1 Edition 2021 review
- New Aston Martin Vantage Roadster 2020 review
Used car tests
- Used Alfa Romeo 4C (Mk1, 2014-2019) review
- Used Alfa Romeo Giulia (Mk1, 2016-date) review
- Used Aston Martin DB9 (2004-2016) review
- Used Bentley Continental GT (Mk3, 2018-date) review
- Used Bentley Continental GT (Mk2, 2010-2018) review
- Used BMW 1 Series (Mk3, 2019-date) review
- Used BMW X1 review
- Used DS 7 Crossback (Mk1, 2017-date) review
- Used DS 5 review
- Ferrari 348: Buying guide and review (1989-1994)
Press the accelerator and there’s a momentary pause before the electronic handbrake disengages to offer access to the 70bhp electric motor’s decent low-speed torque. This drive is fed through the front wheels via a CVT transmission. The car feels nippy through the corners, too, the low centre of gravity helping to minimise body roll; impressive considering the 1,080kg prototype’s set-up hasn’t yet been tweaked for the UK.
For this reason, it’s probably a bit early to say how the MG EV would deal with our bumpier roads, although round the smooth track it rode well – an unnaturally high floor was alone in signalling the under-seat 18KWh lithium iron phosphate battery back. The regenerative braking system was less impressive and could do with kicking in a bit more to limit the need to manually brake.
Although we weren’t able to check, in a straight line the MG EV should top out at 81mph, and a claimed 0-62mph time of 14.6 seconds felt about right. That sprint is 2.2 seconds slower than the VW e-up!.
The charge time is slightly more competitive: getting back to full power is said to take up to six-hours from a standard power source but an 80 per cent charge can be achieved in 30 minutes from a rapid charging point.
Where the MG EV really falls short of rivals at the moment is range, unfortunately also a key benchmark for all EVs. The official NEDC figure stands at 75 miles, a figure some way off the i3’s 118 miles or the Nissan Leaf’s 120 miles. MG, however, argues the range is more than sufficient for city use and the average daily commute (roughly ten miles per day), the idea being to possibly pitch its EV as a functional second car.
Getting the price right is therefore going to be key, but at the moment MG refuses to be drawn on where a production model might sit, emphasising the need to wait for more comprehensive charging infrastructure and standardisation. If it does sufficiently undercut the main competition, performance shortcomings will be easier to overlook, and the EV could point to a bright future for the brand.